Main Article Content

Laras Adysti Nariswari
Febby Mutiara Nelson

Abstract

Banking crime is a special external criminal law or administrative penal law which in law enforcement should adhere to the principle of ultimum remedium. However, there is an article in the Banking Law which reflects that criminal sanctions can still be imposed even though OJK has given administrative sanctions to perpetrators of banking crimes. Thus it can be interpreted that the article is not in line with the formulation of the Banking Law as an administrative penal law, which in law enforcement should prioritize the principle of ultimum remedium. Implementation of this article results in the emergence of disparities and can potentially cause problems in the law enforcement system. This article discuss how to apply the ultimum remedium principle in the process of handling banking crimes with the existence of the article that is not in line, by looking at the principles of banking crime as an economic crime, using normative research methodology. To avoid potential differences in interpretation regarding the implementation of Article 52, paragraph (1) of the Banking Law, the wording of those article can be amended to explicitly state that the Banking Law adheres to the principle of ultimum remedium in accordance with its specific nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nariswari, L. A., & Nelson, F. M. (2023). Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in the Formulation of Legislation and Law Enforcement related to Banking Crimes. LEGAL BRIEF, 12(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i2.811
References
Abiyoga, D., A, I. T., & Arjun, D. (2021, May). Studi Pemetaan Hukum Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Di Indonesia. Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(1), 1-12.
Anugrah, I. K., Widyantara, I. M., & Arini, D. G. (2022, May). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Nasabah Bank atas Tindak Pidana Pencatatan Palsu dalam Dokumen Perbankan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(2), 294-299.
Djokdja, G. R., Adam, S., & Sopacua, M. G. (2022, April). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pembobolan Kartu Kredit Dalam Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perbankan. Tatohi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 178-192.
Enschede, C. J. (2002). Beginselen Van Strafrecht. Deventer: Kluwer.
Faridah. (2018). Jenis-Jenis Tindak Pidana Perbankan dan Perbandingan Undang-Undang Perbankan. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 3(2), 106-125.
Hamzah, A. (1983). Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hiariej, E. O. (2018, June 12). Lex Specialis Dalam Hukum Pidana. Kompas, p. 7.
Hiariej, E. O. (2021, March). Asas Lex Specialis Systematis dan Hukum Pidana Pajak. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(1), 1-11.
Hiariej, E. O. (2022, October 18). Penanganan Dugaan Tindak Pidana Perbankan Melalui Langkah Tindakan Pengawasan, Pengenaan Sanksi Administratif, dan Sanksi Pidana. Focus Group Discussion Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jakarta.
Januarsyah, M. P. (2017, December). Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3), 257-276.
Kristian, & Gunawan, Y. (2018). Tindak Pidana Perbankan dalam Proses Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Grup.
Mangala, D., & Soni, L. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on Frauds in Banking Sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 285-301.
Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Penemuan Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Pahami & Hindari: Buku Memahami dan Menghindari Tindak Pidana Perbankan (Sesuai Undang-Undang Perbankan). Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Ikhtisar Perbankan. Retrieved from Otoritas Jasa Keuangan: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/ikhtisar-perbankan/Pages/Lembaga-Perbankan.aspx
Pangaribuan, L. M. (2019). Tindak Pidana Ekonomi dan Anti Korupsi: Pengantar, Ketentuan, dan Pertanyaan-Pertanyaan. Jakarta: Papas Sinar Sinanti.
Prasetyo. (2018). Hukum Pidana (Revisi). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahmanda, B., & Benuf, K. (2020, October). Hambatan dan Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perbankan Di Indonesia. Law, Development and Justice Review, 3(2), 169-178.
Ramiyanto. (2016, December). Conditional Imprisonment Sentencing in Banking Criminal Case. Jurnal Yudisial, 9(3), 317-338.
Ribut Baidi, D. S. (2023, January). Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Perbankan Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Undang-Undang Perbankan. Journal Justiciabellen, 3(1), 1-13.
Santoso. (2020). Hukum Pidana: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sari, I. (2019, September). Unsur-Unsur Delik Materiel dan Delik Formil dalam Hukum Pidana Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(1), 64-80.
Simatupang, H. B. (2019, December). Peranan Perbankan dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma (JRAM), 6(2), 136-146.
Sofian, A. (2020, December). Rubric of Faculty Members. Retrieved from Business Law Bina Nusantara: https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2020/12/23/ultimum-remedium-dalam-tindak-pidana-ketenagakerjaan/
Sudarto. (2006). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Sulistiawati, S., Toule, E. R., & Sopacua, M. G. (2022, July). Pertanggungjawaban Perbankan Sebagai Korporasi Atas Penggelapan Dana Nasabah yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Bank. Tatohi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(5), 509-522.
Supartoyo, Y. H. (2018). Pengaruh Sektor Keuangan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat terhadap Perekonomian Regional Wilayah Sulawesi. Kajian Ekonomi & Keuangan, 2(1), 16-38.
Tommy. (2021). Asas Ultimum Remedium Tidak Mengurangi Penerimaan Pajak. Retrieved from Pajakku: https://www.pajakku.com/read/6188fb634c0e791c3760bdcf/Asas-Ultimum-Remedium-Tidak-Mengurangi-Penerimaan-Pajak