Analysis of Default on Illegal Online Loans in The Review of Civil Law and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i3.1055Keywords:
Default, Online Loan, Civil Law, Islamic LawAbstract
The development of information and communication technology has given birth to innovations in various fields, including the financial sector. One of the rapidly developing innovations is the emergence of online loans (pinjol). However, this pinjol has the potential for problems, one of which is the rise of illegal pinjol. This study aims to determine the process of agreements between online loan platforms and consumers, regulations and rights and obligations in agreements between online loan platforms and consumers according to civil law and Islamic law, and legal liability if one party defaults or violates the law. This research is a descriptive study with a normative research approach. The data sources for this study are secondary data and primary data. Data collection was carried out using literature studies and field studies (interviews). Furthermore, the data was analyzed using a qualitative approach. The results of this study show that the agreement process between illegal online loan platforms and consumers in Indonesia often does not meet the requirements for a valid contract regulated in the Civil Code, and violates the principles of consumer protection regulated in Law No. 8 of 1999. Agreements in online loan platforms, both according to civil law and Islamic law, must meet the requirements for a valid agreement which include agreement, capacity, clear objects, and lawful causes. In Islam, lending and borrowing must be done based on the principle of qardh which upholds mutual assistance and compliance with sharia. In the event of a default or violation of the law, especially in the context of illegal online loans, the agreement is invalid and null and void because it does not meet the requirements set out in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and does not comply with the principles of sharia law
Downloads
References
Alfarisi, M., Ternando, A., Irawan, A., Rahman, R., & Syazali, E. A. (2023). Penerapan Kontrak Perjanjian Kerja di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHper). Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 15(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v15i1.440
Aliyudin, R. S. (2020). Peran Financial Technology dalam Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia. J-Aksi?: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.31949/j-aksi.v1i1.175
Andriyana, D. (2020). Konsep Utang Dalam Syariat Islam. Jurnal Al-fatih Global Mulia. https://doi.org/10.59729/alfatih.v2i2.22
Arifin, M. (2020). Membangun Konsep Ideal Penerapan Asas Iktikad Baik dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2119
Asmawati. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Penyalahgunaan Kartu Kredit Terhadap Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Jual beli. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Budiarto, A., & Pujiyono. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Pengguna Mobile Banking. Privat Law, 9(2), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v9i2.60038
Djazuli, A. (2007). Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih. Prenada Media Group.
Fitriani, H., Hafidz, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pinjaman Online Ilegal Perspektif Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Islam. Journal of Lex Generalis, 3(3), 501–516.
Gumilang, T. S. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dan Akibat Hukum Pengesahan Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum. Lex Renaissance, 4(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol4.iss1.art8
Hidayati, N., & Sarono, A. (2019). Pelaksanaan Akad Qardh Sebagai Akad Tabbaru. Notarius, 12(2), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i2.29137
Ikafitria, R., Wahid, S. H., Islami, L. I., & Putri, R. Z. (2022). Akad Qardh Perspektif Fatwa DSN-MUI tentang Qardh: Studi Kasus pada Gabungan Kelompok Tani Ngudi Makmur Magetan. Jurnal Antologi Hukum, 2(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.21154/antologihukum.v2i2.1333
Indrawati, S., & Khakim, N. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Akibat Wanprestasi dalam Kasus Pinjaman Online (Studi Putusan Nomor 263/Pdt.G/2021/PN JKT.SEL). Eksaminasi: Jurnal Hukum.
Lova, E. F. (2021). Financial Technology Peer To Peer Lending Syariah: Sebuah Perbandingan Dan Analisis. Journal of Economic and Business Law Review, 1(2), 29–42.
Malgieri, G., & Niklas, J. (2020). Vulnerable Data Subjects. Computer Law & Security Review, 37(105415), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105415
Maramis, S. N., Kalalo, M. E., & Mamengko, R. S. (2023). Kajian Hukum Tentang Keabsahan Jual Beli Online Pada Aplikasi Facebook. Lex Privatum, 11(4), 1–8.
Najwan, G. A., & Sudarwanto, A. S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Data Pribadi Peminjam yang Disalahgunakan oleh Layanan Pinjaman Online Ilegal. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 17115–17132. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i2.14778
Nasution, R., Yuannisa, R. A., & Nurlaila, N. (2023). Peran Financial Technology terhadap Perkembangan Akuntansi Syariah. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 8(2), 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v8i2.19405
Noviyanti, D. P., & Purwanti, N. P. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Pengguna Pinjaman Online Dari Bocornya Data Pribadi Akibat Penagihan Hutang Pinjaman Online Ilegal. Kertha Semaya?: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(8), 897–1907. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2022.v10.i08.p15
Nuzula, A. F., Junaidi, A., Hakim, L., & Ihsan, M. M. (2022). Praktik Hutang Piutang Online pada Aplikasi Pinjaman Now Tinjauan Fatwa DSN MUI dan KHES. Jurnal Antologi Hukum, 2(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.21154/antologihukum.v2i2.1328
Pebriansyah, Y., Rahayu, F. A., Febrianty, Y., & Mahifal, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Fintech Pinjaman Online. Syntax Literate?; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i9.14240
Savila, L. N., Kurniawati, F., & Gunawan, A. (2024). Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Transaksi Bayar Nanti (Paylater) Pada Aplikasi Shopee: Pendahuluan, metode penelitian, hasil dan pembahasan, kesimpulan, daftar pustaka. Sahmiyya: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 3(1), 58–66.
Setiawan, M. H. (2020). Keistimewaan Fiqh Muamalah/ Sistem Ekonomi Islam Dengan Sistem Ekonomi Lainya. Al-Mizan?: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 78–98.
Tampubolon, M. H. P., Pawennei, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). Efektivitas Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Secara Online. Journal of Lex Generalis, 2(4), 1585–1600.
Wardani, Y. K., Rohaini, R., Rusmawati, D. E., Nurhasanah, S., & Akbar, M. K. (2023). Sosialisasi Legalitas Dan Bahaya Pinjaman Online Pada Masyarakat Pekon Sukabumi, Kecamatan Batu Brak, Lampung Barat. Buguh: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(3), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.23960/buguh.v3n3.857
Wardhani, H. P., & Ningsih, A. S. (2024). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Hukum Perikatan: Unsur-unsur Perbuatan dan Implikasi Kewajiban Ganti Rugi. The Prosecutor Law Review, 2(1), 30–47.
Wati, D., & Syahfitri, T. (2022). Dampak Pinjaman Online Bagi Masyarakat. Community Development Journal?: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(3), 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v2i3.2950
Widoyanto, H., & Ratna, D. (2023). Tindak Pidana Pengancaman Dalam Penanganan Kasus Pinjaman Online. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(1), 926–946. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.2577
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
