Legal Analysis of Criminal Acts of Corruption of Livestock Budget (Study of Decision No.3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021)

Authors

  • Stevi Idhel Wheis Damanik Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Arif prasetyo Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rodiatun Adawiyah Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Widodo Ramadhana Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Josua Pramana Adika Sembiring Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i4.1075

Keywords:

Livestock Budget, Corruption Crimes, Putusan No 3038/K/Pid.Sus/2021

Abstract

One of the crimes that is always in the spotlight in Indonesia is the problem of corruption. Corruption is no longer a foreign thing in this country. Indonesian corruption is even classified as an extraordinary crime because it has damaged not only state finances and the country's economic potential, but has also destroyed the pillars of socio-cultural, moral, political and legal security of Indonesia. As happened in the decision Number 3038 K / Pid.Sus / 2021, which stated that there had been a criminal act of corruption in the grant activity budget of the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service in 2016, which was carried out by the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, SE bin MUCHAMAD HABIB. The empirical normative method is the method applied in this research where this method is carried out through research activities on reading materials and directly reviewing the objects being studied. The application of Article 2 Paragraph 1 of the Corruption Eradication Law in Decision Number 3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021 to the Defendant IMAM HANAFI, Se is in accordance with the fact that the defendant is a person assigned by the East Java Provincial Animal Husbandry Service to coordinate 5 Groups that will receive grant funds to buy livestock. That the judge in deciding the case considered that the defendant's actions had fulfilled the elements of a crime in Article 2 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akrom, M. (n.d.). NUANSA WACANA INTELEKTUAL PMII: Sebuah Pergulatan Pemikiran. Guepedia.

Ariyanti, D. O., & Ariyani, N. (2020). Model Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 328–344.

Chaniago, N. S. F., Butar-Butar, M., Aritonang, Z. R., Sirait, A. R., & Ry, A. A. (2023). ANALISA HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN TERHADAP ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NO: 221/PID. SUS/2022/PN MEDAN). Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP), 6(1), 36–45.

Danil, E. (2021). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ferine, K. F. (2023). Leadership. Selat Media.

Fiter, D. J., Sahari, A., & Mansar, A. (2024). Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kejaksaan Negeri Deli Serdang). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2), 198–208.

Mardiana, D. A., & Mardijono, H. R. A. (n.d.). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana dalam Korupsi Dana Hibah di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 5(1), 458658.

Nainggolan, B. (2023). Perbankan syariah di Indonesia. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.

Oktoberi, R. (2021). Modus Korupsi Dana Desa Oleh Kepala Desa (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Parit Di Desa X Kecamatan Rokan Iv Koto Kabupaten Rokan Hulu). Universitas Islam Riau.

Pasmatuti, D. (2019). Perkembangan Pengertian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(1).

Pusparini, N. L. M. D., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2020). Urgensi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(1), 179–185.

Putri, D. (2021). Korupsi Dan Prilaku Koruptif. Tarbiyah Bil Qalam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Sains, 5(2).

Rosikah, C. D., & Listianingsih, D. M. (2022). Pendidikan antikorupsi: Kajian antikorupsi teori dan praktik. Sinar Grafika.

Ruslan Renggong, S. H., Ruslan, D. A. R., & SH, M. K. (2021). Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Prenada Media.

Saputra, E. F., & Firmansyah, H. (2023). Politik Hukum dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Extraordinary Crime dalam KUHP Nasional. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4493–4504.

Siswadi, G. A. (2023). Merayakan Kemerdekaan dalam Belajar. Nilacakra.

Suryanto, A. F. B. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Menyuap Dan Gratifikasi Di Indonesia. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(2), 4.

Syamsuddin, A. R. (2020). Pembuktian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jambura Law Review, 2(2), 161–181.

Umar, H., Purba, R. B., Safaria, S., Mudiar, W., & Sariyo, H. (2021). The new Strategy in Combating Corruption (Detecting Corruption: HU-Model). Merdeka Kreasi Group.

WARANINGTYAS, H. D. R. (2022). Sistem Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law.

WARDANI, A. A. (2023). Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Melalui Virtual Currency (Cryptocurrency) Dan Pengaturannya Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.

Zein, M. F. (2020). Dari Menara62 Untuk Indonesia. Menara62 Institute.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-23

How to Cite

Damanik, S. I. W., prasetyo, M. A., Adawiyah, R., Ramadhana, W., & Sembiring, J. P. A. (2024). Legal Analysis of Criminal Acts of Corruption of Livestock Budget (Study of Decision No.3038 K/Pid.Sus/2021). LEGAL BRIEF, 13(4), 953–959. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i4.1075

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law