The Construction of Corporate Fault related to Corporate Criminal Liability in the New Criminal Code: Implications and Formulation

Authors

  • Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara University of Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i5.1151

Keywords:

Corporations, Companies, Criminal Offenses, Sanctions, Violations

Abstract

 On January 6, 2023, President Joko Widodo signed a new Penal Code (Law No. 1/2023) regulating corporate criminal liability in Indonesia, introducing significant changes in corporate criminal law. This regulation alters the definition, subjects, conditions of liability, justifications, and sanctions for corporations. The aim of this research is to identify the implications of the construction of corporate fault in the new Penal Code on corporate criminal liability in Indonesia and to formulate appropriate criminal sanctions based on this construction. The research employs a normative legal method with a legislative approach to analyze the construction of corporate fault in Law No. 1/2023, affecting corporate criminal liability in Indonesia. Data is gathered from legal texts, court decisions, legal literature, and analyzed with a focus on the implications and formulation of suitable sanctions for corporations. The implications of the construction of corporate fault in the new Penal Code (Law No. 1/2023) on corporate criminal liability in Indonesia are highly significant, expanding the accountability of corporations and individuals involved in corporate criminal activities. Despite varying opinions on these changes, the implementation of the new Penal Code reflects the government's commitment to improving corporate governance, promoting legal compliance, and ensuring the protection of public interests. The formulation of appropriate and proportionate criminal sanctions should encompass various aspects, ranging from fines to rigorous monitoring, restitution, and corporate education, to foster a more ethical and sustainable business environment while maintaining fairness and legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, S. (2023). Pengaturan Pendampingan Narapidana yang Menderita Gangguan Mental selama Menempuh Hukuman di Lapas. Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya, 3(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v3i1.5242

Anarki, A. S. (2023). KEBIJAKAN SANKSI PIDANA MATI DALAM PEMBAHARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA NASIONAL DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEADILAN DAN ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Asril, J. (2019). Etika Bisnis dan Konsep Good Corporate dalam Menciptakan Perusahaan Berbasis Nilai. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 3(2), 215–224.

Aston, P., & Magnis-Suseno, F. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). In Evolusi Pemikiran Dan Sejarah Perkembangan Hak Asasi Manusia. Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Dzikroh, N. A. L. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PADA KASUS KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI REMBANG. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Faisal, F., Rahayu, D. P., & Yokotani, Y. (2022). Criminal Sanctions’ Reformulation in the Reclamation of the Mining Community. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2222

Hadi, A. M., Fajrin, Y. A., & Ishwara, A. S. S. (2023). The Construction of Social Work Criminal Sanctions in Indonesian Criminal Law. Unram Law Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v7i2.299

Harjono, D. K. (2007). HUKUM PENANAMAN MODAL Tinjauan Terhadap Pemberlakuan Undang Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal.

Hikmawati, P. (2017). Kendala Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Negara Hukum, 8(1), 131–150.

Jatmiko, A. (2023). Terkait Vonis Hukuman Mati Sambo, Ini 13 Perbedaan KUHP Lama dan Baru Artikel ini telah tayang di Katadata.co.id dengan judul “Terkait Vonis Hukuman Mati Sambo, Ini 13 Perbedaan KUHP Lama dan Baru” , https://katadata.co.id/agungjatmiko/ekonopedia/63ecbb96. Katadata.Co.Id.

KlikLegal.com. (2023). KUHP Baru Kini Bisa Pidanakan Korporasi, Begini Ketentuannya!

Kusumo, B. A. (2008). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Wacana Hukum, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.33061/1.jwh.2008.7.2.333

Martha, I. D. A. G. M., & Suartha, I. D. M. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 5(4), 766. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2016.v05.i04.p10

Ningrum, H. W. (2018). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 1(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1633

Pratiwi, F. (2023). Pengamat: Presiden Berikutnya Harus Lanjutkan Capaian Pembangunan Jokowi. REPUBLIK.

Priambada, B. S., & Ishwara, A. S. S. (2023). National Criminal Law Transition: Existence and Implications of Criminal Law Before the Enactment of New Criminal Code. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 7(December), 294–309. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ/article/view/32127%0Ahttps://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ/article/download/32127/18971

Pujiyono, & Susanti, R. D. (2019). ALTERNATIF MODEL PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI MELALUI PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, 2(2).

Rizki, M. J. (2022). Kupas-Tuntas Ketentuan Pidana Korporasi dalam KUHP Baru. Hukumonline.Com.

Rohman, T., & Sugiharto. (2023). PEMIDANAAN MODEL DOUBLE TRACK SYSTEM BAGI KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.56943/dekrit.v13n1.155

Santoso, B. T., Munir, A., Hukum, F., Surabaya, U. B., Hukum, F., & Negara, K. (2023). Bagus-Munir-Upaya+Pencegahan+Penyalahgunaan. Widya Pranata Hukum?: Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 5(1), 1–14.

Satria, H. S. (2018). Pembuktian Kesalahan Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. INTEGRITAS, 4(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.255

Satria, H. S. (2020). Kebijakan Kriminal Pencegahan Korupsi Pelayanan Publik. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.660

Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2019). Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Setyoningsih, E. V. (2021). Implementasi Ratifikasi Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Right (Trips Agremeent) terhadap Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v2i2.11749

Sriwidodo, J. (2022). PERTANGGUNJAWABAN KEJAHATAN KORPORASI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA. Kepel Press.

Suryani, A. I. (2023). PENAFSIRAN FRASA FASILITAS LAINNYA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TERKAIT GRATIFIKASI SEKSUAL. UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq.

Tawalujan, J. (2012). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI TERHADAP KORBAN KEJAHATAN. Lex Crimen, I(3).

Wahyuni, F. (2017). DASAR-DASAR HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA. PT Nusantara Persada Utama.

Wilardjo, S. B. (2011). Ethics is the discipline that examines your moral standards or the moral standards of a society to evaluate their reasonableness and. Jurnal Unimus, 7(2), 1–19.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-15

How to Cite

Sanathana Ishwara, A. S. (2024). The Construction of Corporate Fault related to Corporate Criminal Liability in the New Criminal Code: Implications and Formulation. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(5), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i5.1151

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law