Law and Technology: Legal Technology Model under the Authority of the Indonesian Notary Position in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0
Keywords:
law and technology, legal technology, notary positionAbstract
The era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 has changed the old paradigm and standard values quickly. Likewise, the legal aspect cannot be separated from the demand to transform every concept, value and paradigm. On the public law side, each country is required to reform its legal rules to be adaptive and compatible with the development of the 4.0 era, while on the private law side it has an impact on trade transaction practices that have created new platforms, namely e-commerce and e-contracts. The position of a notary as a part of the legal system cannot avoid the disruption of the development of the industrial revolution. The preservation of the old paradigm of the position of a notary that requires it to be done traditionally should be reconstructed immediately so that the practice of office can develop and meet the demands of the times. This study uses a normative juridical research method through a conceptual approach, a statutory approach and a legal history approach which is elaborated with the concept of disruption technology and the theory of the economic analysis of law. Conclusion This journal describes that the fundamental obstacle to notary practice based on the Legality Principle which relies on Procedure, Authority & Substance should have been able to be transformed electronically based on the legal technology paradigm. With references from various organizational benchmarks and conventions mentioned above, they can be the philosophical, sociological and normative foundations in formulating notarial laws that are compatible, adaptive and adequate to the realities of the industrial revolution era 4.0. Recommendations for the need for legal reform, namely changes to legislation concerning the position of a notary through the establishment of an e-notary PP that integrates in a rigid manner the procedure, substance and authority in applying the authority of a notary in certifying electronic transactions.
Downloads
References
Achmad, W. (2021). Citizen and Netizen Society: The Meaning of Social Change From a Technology Point of View. Jurnal Mantik, 5(3), 1564-1570.
Barton, C. S. (2011). U.S. Patent No. 7,933,813. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Chen, L., Cheng, W., Ciuriak, D., Kimura, F., Nakagawa, J., Pomfret, R., ... & Schwarzer, J. (2019). The digital economy for economic development: free flow of data and supporting policies. Policy Brief, 4.
Cutler, D. M., Jessup, A., Kenkel, D., & Starr, M. A. (2015). Valuing regulations affecting addictive or habitual goods. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6(2), 247-280.
de Fontenay, E. (2016). Agency costs in law-firm selection: are companies under-spending on counsel?. Capital Markets Law Journal, 11(4), 486-509.
Decker, C., & Yarrow, G. (2010). Understanding the economic rationale for legal services regulation. Regulatory Policy Institute Report for the UK Legal Services Board.
Dirking, B., & Kodali, R. R. (2008). Strategies for preparing for e-discovery. Information Management, 42(3), 56.
Drucker, P. F. (2010). Toward the next economics and other essays. Harvard Business Press.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society.
Forell, S., & McDonald, H. M. (2015). Beyond great expectations: modest, meaningful and measurable community legal education and information. Justice Issues, (21), 1-12.
Haris, M. (2014). Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah terhadap Notaris setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 14(1).
Hazard Jr, G. C., Pearce, R. G., & Stempel, J. W. (1983). Why Lawyers Should Be Allowed to Advertise: A Market Analysis of Legal Services. NYUL Rev., 58, 1084.
Hongdao, Q., Bibi, S., Khan, A., Ardito, L., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2019). Legal technologies in action: The future of the legal market in light of disruptive innovations. Sustainability, 11(4), 1015.
Hongdao, Q., Bibi, S., Khan, A., Ardito, L., & Khaskheli, M. B. (2019). Legal technologies in action: The future of the legal market in light of disruptive innovations. Sustainability, 11(4), 1015.
Kasali, R. (2017). Disruption, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services.
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.
Lin, Y. H., & Chen, L. H. (2021, April). Interface Design of Transport Mobile Commerce APP: A Case Study of Taiwan Railway. In Future of Information and Communication Conference (pp. 138-149). Springer, Cham.
Ling, Y. (2010). Upholding free speech and privacy online: A legal-based and market-based approach for Internet companies in China. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 27, 175.
Liyue, H. (2012). Legal Service Market in China: Implementation of China's GATS Commitments and Foreign Legal Services in China. Tsinghua China L. Rev., 5, 29.
Mitcham, C. (1985). What is the Philosophy of Technology?. International Philosophical Quarterly, 25(1), 73-88.
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018). The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain—the case of Hungary. Sustainability, 10(10), 3491.
Ohoitimur, J. (2018). Disrupsi: Tantangan bagi perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan peluang bagi lembaga pendidikan tinggi. Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial, 23(02), 143-166.
Prescott, J. J. (2010). The challenges of calculating the benefits of providing access to legal services. Fordham Urb. LJ, 37, 303.
Sako, M. (2010). Make-or-Buy Decisions in Legal Services: A Strategic Perspective. In Proceedings of the Law Firm Evolution: Brave New World or Business as Usual. Washington DC
Schultz, C. I. (2009). Legal offshoring: A cost-benefit analysis. J. Corp. L., 35, 639.
Wurst, J. (2016). Herbert Marcuse: One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Beacon Press: Boston 1964, 260 S.(dt. Der eindimensionale Mensch. Studien zur Ideologie der fortgeschrittenen Industriegesellschaft, Luchterhand: Neuwied/Berlin 1967, 282 S.). In Klassiker der Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 229-232). Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
