The Role of Granting Expert Information By The Indonesian Financial Examiner's Loss on the Judge's Decision In Proof of Criminal Offense
Keywords:
Judge's Decision, Financial Examiner's Loss, Granting Expert InformationAbstract
The study aims to analyze the role of expertory by the Indonesian finance ministry on assessing the state's losses to the judges decision on alleged criminal corruption and the obstacles it faced by the finance ministry's giving expert testimony in judicial proceedings. The type of research used by the writer is the type of empirical law study. The study is conducted at the finance ministry of the Indonesian Republic of Sulawesi representative and the makassar district court. The legal material used is the primary law ingredient, the data obtained directly from interviews and secondary law materials, data through literature, books, journals, and legislation studies. The material of the law is qualitatively analyzed and presented in descriptive terms. The results of the research, concluded that, (1) The role of giving expert information by BPK is important but evidence is not binding on the judge to render a ruling. So that the judge has the right and freedom to make an appraisal of his perfection and truthfulness, and the judge can either accept, regard and make into consideration the giving of expert information by the body of the financial examiner or not. (2) In general, there are 2 (two) obstacles to proving a link to the criminal corruption, which is a drawback to the country's limited human resources, time for checkups and budgets. And also obstacles during the process of giving expert explanations that include, psychological obstacles, communication barriers, inappropriate congregation schedules, impaired professional health, and lack of material mastery by the expert.
Downloads
References
Andi Hamzah, Corruption in Indonesia Problems and Solutions, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1991
Andi Hamzah, KUHP & KUHAP 17th Edition. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta, 2011, p.30
Beni Kurnia Divine, Muhammad Ikhsan Alia, Accountability for State Finance and Management through BPK and KPK Cooperation. West Sumatra, 2018
Evi Hartanti, Corruption Crime. Semarang : Sinar Graphic, 2005
Fence M. Wantu, Judges Constraints in Creating Legal Certainty, Justice, and Benefits in Civil Courts, Yogyakarta. 2016
The results of the author's interview with Mr. Daniel Sembiring Brahmin, SH Examining Auditor, dated August 2, 2021.
Irwansyah, Legal Research, Choice of Methods & Article Writing Practice, Yogyakarta,2020
Connectivity of the State of Law and Democracy, accessed onhttps://www.kai.or.id/berita/14373/koneksitas-negara-law-dan-democracy.html. At 2:02 p.m.
See Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia.
M. Ied Al Munir. Overview of Empiricism and Rationalism Methods, accessed athttps://media.neliti.com/media/publications/228431-review-against-method-empirism-dan-r-9612b688.pdf, at 15.00 WITA.
R.Soeparmono, Expert Statements and Visum et Repertum in Legal Aspects of Criminal Procedure, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2002
Rahman Amin, Law of Evidence in Criminal and Civil Cases, Yugyakarta : CV Budi Utama. 2020
Siti Rahma Nurdianti. (2014) Analysis of Communication Barriers Factors in Disseminating Family Planning Programs in the Kebong Agung Samarenda community. Visual Post : e Journal of Communication Science,2014,2 (2): 145-159
Suhendar, Concept of State Financial Loss. East Java: Instrans Publishing Group. 2015 .
Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 15 of 2006 concerning the Supreme Audit Agency, Article 6 paragraphs (1-6)