Legal Analysis of Decision No. 575/Pdt/2019/Pt.Bdg Regarding Sales and Purchase Agreements Containing Elements of Fraud through the Principle of Consensuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v14i4.1451Keywords:
Principle of consensualism, fraud, sale and purchase agreement, defective will, Decision 575/PDT/2019/PT.BdgAbstract
This study discusses the application of the principle of consensualism in contract law, particularly in the case of a sale and purchase agreement containing elements of fraud as reflected in the Bandung High Court Decision Number 575/PDT/2019/PT.Bdg. The main focus of the study is to examine the validity of the sale and purchase agreement if there is a defect in will arising from fraud (bedrog) and its legal implications for the parties. The research method used is normative juridical with a library approach, which emphasizes the analysis of articles of the Civil Code, legal literature, and related court decisions. The results of the study indicate that the principle of consensualism as a requirement for the validity of an agreement (Article 1320 of the Civil Code) is not sufficient to be interpreted only with formal agreement, but must be based on free will, honesty, and without fraud. In this case, the binding agreement for the sale and purchase of a house (SP3R) was declared legally invalid because the object of the agreement did not match what was promised, so that the agreement of the parties was not born purely. The panel of judges emphasized that agreements arising from fraud can be annulled and even declared null and void (Article 1321 of the Civil Code), and all legal consequences must be restored, including the return of payment to the buyer. Thus, this study confirms that the principle of consensualism in Indonesian contract law cannot be separated from the principles of honesty, propriety, and good faith. This decision also strengthens the doctrine that agreements containing elements of fraud lose their legal legitimacy and do not produce legal consequences binding on the parties
Downloads
References
Agustina, S. E., SH, M. H., & MPsi, Mp. (2025). Buku Ajar Hukum Lingkungan, Paradigma Baru Hukum Lingkungan: Pendekatan Keadilan Holistik. umsu press.
Almansyah, D., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Tanggungjawab notaris dalam pembuatan akta para pihak di bawah tekanan dan paksaan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(2), 754–766.
Aritama, R. (2022). Penipuan Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata. Sentri: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(3), 728–736.
Cahayani, D. (2023). Kesepakatan Dalam Perjanjian Sebagai Langkah Preventif Terhadap Pencegahan Wanprestasi. JISOS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 2(10), 2007–2016.
Chandraningtyas, A., & Sulastri. (2024). Akibat Hukum Cacat Kehendak dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Pinjaman Online Pada E-Commerce. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(1), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.5.1.8342.750-759
Elfa, R. M., Idayanti, S., & Taufik, M. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Pada Tingkat Pengadilan Tinggi. Penerbit NEM.
Frazila, H. (2023). Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Pelaku Usaha Rumah Makan Sebagai Mitra dengan PT. Goto Gojek TokoPedia Dalam Layanan Go-Food di Kota Padang. Universitas Andalas.
Gunanegara, S. H. (2022). Mafia Tanah & Primum Remedium. GOOGLE PLAY BOOK.
Hadiyanto, A., & Budiman, H. (2023). Tindak Pidana Penipuan Menurut KUHP Dan Syariat Islam. Damera Press.
Herlina Ratna, S. N. (2025). Asas-Asas Umum Hukum Perdata dalam Perspektif Modern. Takaza Innovatix Labs.
Islam, U., & Sumatera, N. (2024). Rewang Rencang?: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.5. No.10 (2024) Tema/Edisi?: Filsafat Hukum, Politik Hukum dan Etika Profesi (Bulan Kesepuluh) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/, 5(10), 1–12.
Istoati, D. A., & Hanim, D. L. (2021). Prosiding KONSTELASI ILMIAH MAHASISWA UNISSULA (KIMU) 5 Penerapan Asas Konsensualisme Dalam Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Rumah Application Of The Principle Of Consensualism In House Renting Agreements, 267–279.
Izzati, N. R. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Undue Influence) dalam Perjanjian Kerja: Karakteristik, Mekanisme Penyelesaian dan Pencegahan. PT Kanisius.
MUNTHE, J. T. B. B. D. (2024). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DENGAN CARA MEMALSUKAN BUKTI TRANSAKSI YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERLANJUT.
Pantow, C. S. (2020). Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Dagang Antar Perusahaan Menurut Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum, 8(2).
Pokhrel, S. (2024). KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI ATAS TANAH YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR CACAT KEHENDAK. ????, 15(1), 37–48.
PROPORSIONAL, Y. B. D. A. N., & JAMIL, N. K. (n.d.). MANIFESTASI ASAS AL-RIDHA SEBAGAI SYARAT SAH PERJANJIAN.
Raharjo, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Yang Mengalami Cacat Kehendak Dalam Proses Pembuatan Perjanjian Bisnis. International Journal Administration, Business & Organization, 2(1), 47–53.
Rondo, A. E., Soeikromo, D., & Kapugu, B. A. (2025). ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN NASABAH MELALUI MEDIASI. LEX PRIVATUM, 15(2).
Sinaga, N. A. (2019). Implementasi hak dan kewajiban para pihak dalam hukum perjanjian. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(1).
Sopiani, S., Senda, V. N., Muzzamil, M. F., & Anugrah, D. (2024). IMPLIKASI HUKUM KETIDAKTERPENUHAN SYARAT SUBJEKTIF DALAM PASAL 1320 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA TERHADAP KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN. Letterlijk, 1(2), 169–182.
Susdarwono, E. T., SH, M. S., Baschara, H. N., & SH, M. H. (2025). Ilmu Forensik dan Penegakan Hukum. Alvarendra Publisher.
WARANINGTYAS, H. D. R. (2022). Sistem Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law.
Wdyawati, E. (2017). Perbuatan Curang (Insurance Fraud) Terhadap Penanggung Asuransi Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Asuransi.
Widodo, G. (2024). Penerapan Asas Konsensualisme Dan Penyelesaian Masalah Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Online Application of the Principle of Consensualism and Problem Resolution in Online Buying and Selling Agreements, 2(1), 183–189.
Zamzam, H. F., & Aravik, H. (2020). Etika Bisnis Islam Seni Berbisnis Keberkahan. Deepublish.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
