The Reconstitution of Death Criminal Imposition against Persons of Criminal Actions on Narcotics Post-Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007

Authors

  • Muhamad Romdoni Universitas Primagraha

Keywords:

narcotics; death penalty; Constitutional Court.

Abstract

Many people consider the death sentence to be a violation of their human rights. For these and other reasons, petitioners Edith Yunita Sianturi, Rani Andriani (Melisa Aprilia), Myuran Sukumaran, Andrew Chan, and Scott Friedrich request that Anthony Rush file a judicial review petition against Articles 28A and 28I, paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution until the Constitutional Court Decision No. 2-3-PUU-IV/2007 is issued. This study employed normative juridical research, which is described as research that focuses on studying the rules or norms in the ius constitutum. The goal of this research is to rebuild the imposition of the death penalty following the Constitutional Court's judgment. For this inquiry, it was decided to take a state-level strategy. The fact that the state is willing to take stronger action, such as the imposition of capital punishment, against drug producers, dealers, and sellers because it has the potential to have a very negative impact on humanity demonstrates that the death penalty does not conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the country's human rights principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, AZ 1983. Anthology of Criminal Law. Jakarta: Pradnya, Paramita.

Arianto, Satya. 2001 Political Law 3. (Jakarta: Postgraduate Program at the University of Indonesia.

Chazawi, Adam. 2002. Criminal Law Lesson I, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Djamali, R. Abdoel. 2005. Introduction to Indonesian Law (Revised Edition), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Hamzah, Andi & A. Sumangelipu. 1985. Death Penalty in Indonesia in the Past, Present and Future, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hidayat, Syamsul. 2010. Death Penalty in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Press.

Abraham, Johnny. 2008. Theory and Methodology of Normative Legal Research. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing

Lam, Ing Oei Tjo. 1964. “About the Matter of the Death Penalty', Varia Judiciary No. 10, 11, 12 May, June, July 1964,

Marpaung, Leden. 2005. Principles-Theories-Practice of Criminal Law, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika

Sahetapy. 1979. Death Penalty for Premeditated Murder. Bandung: Alumni.

Soesilo, R. 1979. Principles of Criminal Law General Regulations and Special Offenses, Bogor: Politea.

Rehnquist, William H. 1989. The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, William Marrow, New York

Indrani, Ria. 2009. Legal standing of foreign nationals in judicial review cases at the constitutional court (case study number 2-3/puu-v/2007 on narcotics law testing). Jakarta: Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia.

Faisal.M. Jokowi's Era of Death Executions and the Irony of Human Rights. <https://tirto.id/execution-mati-zaman-jokowi-dan-ironi-hak-asasi-human-cDhX>.(accessed January 7, 2022)

Ministry of Law and Human Rights.<http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/ files/litigation/Laporanputa Narkotika.pdf>. (accessed January 24, 2022).

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Law No. 39/1999 on Human Rights

Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Court

Law number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-21

How to Cite

Romdoni, M. (2022). The Reconstitution of Death Criminal Imposition against Persons of Criminal Actions on Narcotics Post-Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(2), 508–519. Retrieved from https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/154

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law