Legal Protection For The Community Of Medan City Against The Installation Of Electricity Poles (Case Study At The State Electricity Company)

Authors

  • Rindu Lenggit Dalimunthe State Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Ramadani Ramadani State Islamic University of North Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v15i1.1613

Keywords:

Case study of PT PLN, installation of electricity poles, Legal protection, the Electricity Law, the people of Medan City

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection perceived by the people of Medan City regarding the installation of electricity poles, with a focus on the company responsible for installing them, namely the State Electricity Company (PLN). The background of this research is based on the limited public knowledge of legal provisions governing both corporate and state authority, as well as the inconsistency between electricity infrastructure development and citizens’ land rights and safety guarantees. These conditions often lead to problems such as land disputes or disturbances caused by electricity poles located on privately owned property. The purpose of this study is to analyze the forms of legal protection regulated under Law Number 30 of 2009 on Electricity and to identify the obstacles and solutions in its implementation in Medan City. This research uses an empirical juridical approach with a case study method, involving the analysis of legal documents, interviews with residents to examine the reality of legal protection, interviews with company representatives to understand the actual mechanisms for pole installation and the protection measures applied, and direct field observations at pole installation sites. The results of the study indicate that the reality of legal protection for residents remains relatively weak, particularly in the processes of permit management and the fulfillment of compensation. This is reflected in cases involving PLN that have generated public complaints regarding a lack of transparency and limited public participation. The study concludes that there is a need to educate the community to participate more actively and to improve their understanding of legal protection as consumers, as well as to recognize the gap between regulatory frameworks and their practical implementation in providing legal protection

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief Fahmi Lubis, M. R. (2015). Hukum dan Kebijakan Energi Terbarukan di Indonesia: Analisis Strategi dan Implementasi. Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 5(2), 516-526.

Arifin, Y. R. (2021). Dilematika Kebijakan Ketenagalistrikan Dalam Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6(1), 1-31.

Azhar, K. B. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan Vol. 7 No. 1, 24-25.

Efendi, D. O. (2022). Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, edisi terbaru.

Hadjon, M. (1993). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1, 5.

Ibrahim, J. (2021). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Indonesaia, P. R. (n.d.). pasal 8 UU No. 30 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketenagalistrikan.

Kelsen, H. (2011). Teori umum tentang hukum dan negara. Bandung, Nusa Media, 3.

Leader, W. d. (n.d.). Pemeliharaan (TL HAR)PT PLN (Persero) UP3 Medan Utara 18 November 2025.

Luh Nyoman Diah Sri Prabandari, I. W. (2021). Pemberian Ganti Rugi Terhadap Pengadaan Tanah Oleh Pemerintah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 3(1), 1-5.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

Murjiyanto, R. (2019). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Najicha, A. R. (2021). Hak Akses public Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak atas Tanah . Jurnal hak akses public Universitas sebalas maret, 12 (2), 7.

Nurbani, S. H. (2023). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, cet. terbaru.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dan masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana.

Raharjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 48.

Ressa, Y. R. (2021). Hak Konsumen Memperoleh Ganti Rugi Apabila Terjadi Kesalahan Atau Kelalaian Pengoperasian Oleh Pemegang Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik. Lex Privatum, IX, 12, 16-26.

RI, P. M. (n.d.). No. 123/PDT/2018 tentng Tanah dengan PLN.

Shella Fransiska Landasan, D. R. (2022). Ganti Rugi Hak atas Tanah oleh Pemegang Izin Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2009 tentang Ketenagalistrikan. Lex Privatum, 10(2).

Soekanto, S. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 5.

Soeroso, I. (2021). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: edisi revisi.

Sofyan Ferdiansyah, A. F. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Pt. Pln) Dalam Penanaman Tiang Listrik Di Tanah Bersertifikat Hak Milik. Prosiding SNAPP: Sosial Humaniora, Pertanian, Kesehatan dan Teknologi, 2(1), 203-210.

Subekti, R. (2016). Kebijakan pemberian ganti kerugian dalam pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Yustisia, 5(2), 376-394.

wawancara. (n.d.). dengan ibu nurlailahsyah masyarakat kota medan pada tanggal 16 November 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Dalimunthe, R. L., & Ramadani, R. (2026). Legal Protection For The Community Of Medan City Against The Installation Of Electricity Poles (Case Study At The State Electricity Company). LEGAL BRIEF, 15(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v15i1.1613

Issue

Section

National and International Civil Law, State Administration and Commercial Law