Administrative Discretion and the Risk of Abuse of Authority in Indonesian Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v15i2.1648Keywords:
Administrative discretion, Abuse of authority, Indonesian public administrationAbstract
Administrative discretion is essential in public administration because government officials must often respond to concrete problems, regulatory gaps, urgent situations, and administrative stagnation that cannot be fully addressed through rigid legal rules. In Indonesia, discretionary authority is formally recognized under Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration as a lawful mechanism to maintain responsive governmental action. However, discretion also creates a risk of abuse of authority when it is exercised beyond its legal purpose, detached from public interest, or conducted without accountability and adherence to the General Principles of Good Governance. This study aims to analyze the legal position of administrative discretion in Indonesian public administration, examine its potential transformation into abuse of authority, and formulate a balanced legal and governance framework for controlling discretionary power. This research employs normative legal research supported by a conceptual public administration approach through statutory, conceptual, and analytical methods. The study finds that discretion is indispensable for adaptive governance, but its legitimacy depends on clear legal boundaries, transparent reasoning, proper documentation, effective oversight, and a precise distinction between lawful discretion and unlawful misuse of authority. This article concludes that strengthening these safeguards is necessary to support responsive, accountable, and rule-based governance in Indonesia
Downloads
References
Anggraeny, K. D., & Marbun, R. (2020). Abuse of Authority: A Meaning Deconstruction. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 11(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a17697
Bertelli, A. M., Falletti, V., & Cannas, S. (2025). Authorized Discretion: The Democratic Essentials of Governance in the European Union. Governance, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70029
Bertelli, A. M., Hassan, M., & Honig, D. (2020). An Agenda for the Study of Public Administration in Developing Countries. Governance, 33(4), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12520
Bertelli, A. M., & Schwartz, L. J. (2022). Public Administration and Democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009217613
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2021). The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198790631.001.0001
Considine, M., McGann, M., & Ball, S. (2022). Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work. Journal of Social Policy, 51(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000174
Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2020). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (4th ed.). Routledge.
Deslatte, A., Koebele, E. A., & Wiechman, A. (2024). Embracing the Ambiguity: Tracing Climate Response Diversity in Urban Water Management. Public Administration, 103(1), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13017
Fauzani, M. A. (2023). The Shifting in the Legal Politics of Regulating the General Principles of Good Governance in Indonesian Legislation. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v3i1.14970
Frederickson, H. G. (2021). Social Equity and Public Administration. Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (2021). Liberalism and Its Discontents. Profile Books.
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2022). Implementing Public Policy (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kim, H., & Park, N. (2022). Proactive Problem-Solving Process in Government and Collaborative Public Management. Korean Public Administration Journal, 31(2), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.22897/kipajn.2022.31.2.003
Marin, L., Gkliati, M., & Nicolosi, S. F. (2024). Guest Editorial: The External Borders of the European Union: Between a Rule of Law Crisis and Accountability Gaps. European Law Journal, 30(1–2), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12518
Migchelbrink, K., & de Walle, S. (2020). Increasing the Cost of Participation: Red Tape and Public Officials’ Attitudes Toward Public Participation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(3), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852320942311
O’Flynn, J. (2020). Collaborative Governance and Public Administration. Public Management Review.
Peters, B. G. (2021). Administrative Traditions: Understanding the Roots of Contemporary Administrative Behavior. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297253.001.0001
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, Politics and the State. Policy and Society, 39(1), 1–12.
Puhi, O., Akili, R. Hs., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). The Settlement of Abuse of Authority by Government Officials. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v2i1.37323
Ro’is, N., Yani, T., & Sari, P. M. (2021). Implementation of the Government’s Discretion in Indonesia, Authority, and Responsibility in the Management of Government. Jurnal Dinamika, 1(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.54895/dinamika.v1i2.1151
Selten, F., Robeer, M., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). “Just Like I Thought”: Street-Level Bureaucrats Trust AI Recommendations if They Confirm Their Professional Judgment. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13602
Siahaan, P. N. S. (2021). Elements Testings Distortion of the Abuse of Authority Based on the Government Administration Law and Corruption Crime. Corruptio, 2(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v2i1.2246
Sokolov, A. (2020). Administrative Discretion of Tax Authority as Deterrent to Introduction of Tax Mediation in Ukraine. KELM: Knowledge, Education, Law, Management, 2(4), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.51647/kelm.2020.4.2.31
Suparto, S., Adinda, F. A., & Esanov, A. E. (2024). Administrative Discretion in Indonesia and Netherland Administrative Court: Authorities and Regulations. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.189
Tandungan, E., & Parinussa, E. (2021). Implementation of Dynamic Governance Concept Through Discretion Policy in Facing the National Emergency of Covid-19 in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304623
Váczi, P. (2022). Fair and Effective Public Administration. Institutiones Administrationis, 2(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.45
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
