Design of the Death Penalty as a Legal Instrument for Combating Corruption Crimes
Keywords:
Death Penalty, Countermeasures, CorruptionAbstract
There are two opinions, especially the death penalty, causing controversy over the regulation of the death penalty as a legal instrument to combat corruption. There are those who agree with the imposition of the death penalty and some people in fact question the basis for the justification of the sentence which does not provide opportunities for criminals to improve to become good human beings. In fact, the death penalty for cases of corruption has never been imposed, so the threat of capital punishment cannot be used as an ultimum remedium against perpetrators of corruption. The form of crime and the punishment system in corruption crimes deviates from the general criminal system, namely regarding the form and system of imposing the punishment, regarding the severity of the main crime to be imposed, the maximum limit for each crime has been determined, while the specific minimum limit is not determined, but the general minimum limit. , for example imprisonment and imprisonment for a minimum of one day. In the criminal law of corruption, two main types of criminal sanctions are imposed simultaneously, which are imperative, between imprisonment and fines. - additional types of crime. Imperative-facultative system. It is suggested the need for amendments to the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption by formulating capital punishment for all acts of corruption without any special criteria such as a disaster situation because of its large impact on society, nation and state, so that it becomes the ultimum remedium. The need for judges to impose severe criminal sanctions, so that it can create a deterrent effect for corruptors and other people who have the opportunity to commit corruption are reluctant or afraid to commit acts that violate the law because the criminal sanctions are heavy.
Downloads
References
Adami Chazawi Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Teori-teori Pemidanaan, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2019
Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia Dari Retribusi ke Reformasi, PT, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2015
Barda Nawawi Arief. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Kencana, Jakarta. 2018
Djoko Prakoso dan Nurwachid, Studi Tentang Pendapat-pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dewasa Ini, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2020
J.E. Sahetapy, SuatuStudi Kasus Mengenai Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana, CV.Raja Wali, Jakarta, 2012
Marwan Effendy. Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana), Referensi, Jakarta, 2018.
P.A.F. Lamintang, D. Simins, Kitab Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, CV. Pionir Jaya, Bandung, 2019
Sudarto, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Penerbit Alumni, Bandung, 1986
Rahmad Yuliadi Nasir, Penantian Hukuman Mati Untuk Koruptor, www.google.com, 7 April 2020
Servas Pandur, Testimoni Antasari Azhar Untuk Hukum dan keadilan, Laras indra Semesta, Jakarta, 2018
Soerjono Soekanto, Efektivitas Hukum Dan Penerapan Sanksi, Penerbit Remadja Karya, Bandung, 2019
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).
Undang-undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Pasal 2 ayat 2 UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5843984/pakar-hukum-ugm-minta-hati-hati-maknai-pasal-hukuman-mati-ke-koruptor, 6 Pebruari 2022