Review on The Inclusion Of The Exoneration Clause In The Standard Clause Based On Law No 8 Of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection
Keywords:
Consumer Protection, Standard Agreement, Exonaration ClauseAbstract
This study aims to obtain information and analyze the law regarding consumer protection against standard agreements that include an exoneration clause and the responsibilities of business actors that include an exoneration clause. A standard agreement is an agreement where all the clauses are standardized by one party in the agreement without the participation of the other party which basically can eliminate the opportunity to request a change of the agreement. , or hidden defects. The standard agreement that includes the exoneration clause is prohibited because it is very contrary to the principles of good faith, the principle of balance, the principle of justice and especially the principle of freedom of contract which has been accommodated in Article 1338 of the Civil Code, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection in Articles 19 to Article 28 regulates the responsibilities of business actors in being accountable for all business activities carried out. Protection and supervision of consumers and business actors can be achieved by the existence of concern, involvement, and cooperation between the government, community, business actors, and (LPKSM) the existence of BPSK is expected to be achieved a sense of justice for all parties in conflict in consumer disputes, the government and law enforcement in this case (Polri Investigators, Civil Servants, Prosecutors, Judiciary and Advocates), must play an active role in monitoring and implementing the existence of this Consumer Protection Act, especially Article 18 aya t 1 About inclusion clause containing exoneration clause.
Downloads
References
Anjani, I., & Purwanto, IWN (2020). Responsibilities of Business Actors for Inclusion of Exoneration Clauses in Laundry Notes1. Journal of Kertha Semaya, 8(3), 438–451.
https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/download/57489/33634
Bawarodi, J. (2014). EXISTENCE AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE EXENORAS CLAUSE. Lex Privatum, Vol. II/No. 3/Aug-Oct/2014, II(3), 49–55.
Dauri, D., & Waliyyatunnisa, N. (2020). Legal Consequences on the Application of the Exoneration Clause in the Standard Agreement. Humani (Law and Civil Society), 10(1), 97–111.
Fidhayanti, D. (2014). STANDARD AGREEMENTS ACCORDING TO SHARIA PRINCIPLES (Juridical Review of Financing Practices in Islamic Banking). Journal de Jure, 6(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v6i2.3206
kadek ayu desi chandara dewi, AAKS (2016). BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE EXONERATION CLAUSE WHICH IS DAMAGE TO THE CONSUMER ON LAUNDRY NOTES. 4(1), 1–23.
Kamil, Muhammad Ikhsan & Kusuma, JD (2021). The inclusion of an exoneration clause in the agreement according to the Civil Code. 4(1).
M.Aware. (2012). CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW IN INDONESIA. ACADEMY.
MAYRA, G. (2016). Exoneration Clause in Consumer Protection Law in Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 35–41.
Muthiah, A. (2018). CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW Dimensions of Positive Law and Sharia Economics. New Press Library.
Nachrawi, G., & Dewi, C. (2021). LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF DISTRIBUTORS OF PHARMACEUTICAL APPLIANCES WITHOUT A DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (Case Study of Court Decision Number: 351/Pid.Sus/2018/PN SMn). 6(2). https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharmasi,
NJCLD. (2016). THE ROLE AND FUNCTION OF SUPERVISORY INSTITUTIONS IN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS ACTORS ACCORDING TO LAW NO. 8 OF 1999 CONCERNING CONSUMER PROTECTION. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(1), 2071–2079.
Panggabean, RM (2010). Validity of Agreement With Standard Clauses. Journal of the Law of Ius Quia Iustum, 17(4), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss4.art8
Rachman, T. (2018). EXONERATION CLAUSE IN CONSUMER PROTECTION PERSPECTIVE. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., IX, 10–27.
Rinaldi, N. (2019). The Role of the Payakumbuh City Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (Bpsk) Against Consumer Disputes. JCH (Journal of Scholar of Law), 4(2), 321. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v4i2.138
Rohaya, N. (2018). Prohibition of Use of Standard Clauses Containing Exoneration Clauses in Consumer Protection. Replik Legal Journal, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v6i1.1116
Rosmawati. (2018). PRINCIPLES OF CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW. PRENADA MEDIA GROUP.
Sari, IAP, & Artha, I. gede. (2019). Consumer legal protection against standard clause agreements in shopping centers. Kertha Semaya, 7(4), 1–15.
Setiono. (2004). The Supremacy of Law. scholar.
Sinaga, M., Busro, A., & Hendrawati, D. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Penggunaan Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Perjanjian Baku Perusahaan Jasa Pengiriman Barang Oleh PT. Citra Van Titipan Kilat (Tiki). Diponegoro Law Review, 5(2), 1–12.
Yunita. (2018). Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce) Lazada Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 833–836.
