Indonesia’s Constitutional Foundation Applies the Death Penalty Against the Intermediary for the Sale and Purchase of Narcotics Bandar
Keywords:
Death Penalty, Human Rights, SovereigntyAbstract
The danger of narcotics use is quite large in its influence on the state, if there is a large-scale use of narcotics in society, then the Indonesian nation will become a sick nation, if this happens the country will be fragile from within because national resilience has declined. This research plays an important role in obtaining accurate and reliable data. Therefore, the research method used as a tool or method for guiding in conducting research is normative juridical, namely analyzing the relationship between applicable laws and regulations with legal theory and practice of implementing positive law in the field regarding the issues discussed. In conclusion, the definition of the right to life as regulated in Article 28 J paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution is a right where no one's life may be taken arbitrarily. What is not allowed is "arbitrarily deprivide of his life". Meanwhile, regarding the difference in decisions between the Serang District Court Decision Number 837/Pid.Sus/2020/PN. Srg who decided the death penalty, which was annulled by the decision of the Banten High Court Number 36/PID.SUS/2021/PT BTN), is not a substantive matter, all judges agree on the death penalty, but rather on a matter of belief and a matter of trial technicality such as the number that is still doubtful by the Serang judges, and the elderly age of the defendant.
Downloads
References
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2001).
Anwar, Yesmil, Adang, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Grasindo, 2008).
Anang Iskandar, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Grasindo, 2008).
Bambang Hariyono, “Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkoba di Indonesia”, Tesis (Semarang, Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.)
Bayu Puji Hariyanto. 2018. Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Peredaran Narkoba Di Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum. Vol. 1 (1) 2018:201-210.
Djoko Prakoso, Surat Dakwaan, Tuntutan Pidana dan Eksaminasi Perkara di Dalam Proses Pidana, (Yogyakarta, Liberty, 2007).
Dirdjosisworo, Soedjono, Hukum Narkotika Indonesia, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,, 2000).
Gatot Supramono, Hukum Narkoba Indonesia, (Jakarta, Djambatan, 2004).
Hartawi. A.M, dalam Andi Hamzah dan A. Sumangelipu, Pidana Mati di Indonesia, (Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 2003).
Harun Alrasid, Naskah UUD 1945 Sesudah Empat Kali Diubah oleh MPR, (Jakarta, Penrbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-PRESS), 2004). ICCPR, Pasal 6 ayat (1) Konvensi Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik.
Muladi, “Hak Asasi Manusia, Politik dan danSistim Peradilan “, (Semarang, Undip, 2007).
Putusan PN No 36/PID./SUS/2021 PT Banten
Putusan PN No 837/ID./Susu/2020/PN Serang.
Ronny Hanitijo, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia, 2000).
Soerjono, Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta, UI Press, 2010).
Taufik Makaro, Suhasril, dan H.Moh. Zakky A.S. Tindak Pidana Narkotika, (Jakarta: Ghalian Indonesia, 2003).
UUD RI 1945
UU No 1 Tahun 1946 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
UU No 22 Tahun 1997 Tentang Narkotika.
UU No 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.
UU No.39 Tahun 1999 Tentang HAM
Zainal Abidin Farid, Hukum Pidana I, (Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2007).
Wirasila, Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Indonesia.
Wijayanti Puspita Dewi. 2019. Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Atas Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Hakim Di Bawah Ketentuan Minimum Ditinjau Dari UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.
Yohanes Wahyu Prasetiyo, Hukum Menurut H.L.A. Hart dan Relevansinya untuk Mewujudkan Hukum yang Adil di Indonesia, https://jpicofmindonesia.org/2020/07/hukum-menurut, Hart, diunduh April, 2022.)
