Analysis The Deed of Sale and Purchase Shares Pretends and Its Consequences on The Strength of The Deed
Keywords:
Deed of Sale and Purchase of Fake Shares, Share Purchase, NotaryAbstract
In carrying out the sale and purchase of shares, Notary should ensure that the procedure for the transfer of shares is carried out in accordance with the law, because it can result the validity of the deed made by Notary. As happened in the case in Court Decision No. 1681 K/Pdt/2017, the Judges decided that the Deed of Sale and Purchase made by Notary was a fake deed. In this case, Notary also does not ask for proof of payment of the purchase of shares, so it is said that Notary does not apply the precautionary principle. What can make a Deed of Sale and Purchase as a fake Share Purchase Deed and what are the consequences fot the legal force of the deed are two problem formulations to be analyzed based on juridical research methods and qualitative analysis. From the results of the study, it was found that several factors caused a Deed of Sale and Purchase of Shares to be declared as a fake deed which then affected the legal force of the deed.
Downloads
References
Book
Abdul Ghofur Ansori. Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2009.
Kie, Tan Thong. Studi Notariat?: Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris. Jakarta: Ichtiar Van Hoeve, 2000.
M. Luthfan Hadi Darus. Hukum Notariat Dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2010.
Pieter E. Latumeten. Cacat Yuridis Akta Notaris Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Konkrit Dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Jakarta: Tuma Press, 2011.
Sembiring, Sentosa. Hukum Perusahaan Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Bandung: CV. Nuansa Aulia, 2013.
Septiani Eka Mawarni. “Jual Beli Saham Perseroan Terbatas.” Universitas Hasanuddin, 2012.
Sjaifurrachman; Habib Adjie. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1977.
Article Journal
Darusman, Yoyon Mulyana. “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Otentik Dan Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2016): 44.
Herianto Sinaga. “Tanggungjawab Werda Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Dibuatnya.” Premis Law Journal 6 (2015): 1.
I Wayan Paramata Jaya; dkk. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Berkenaan Dengan Kebenaran Subtansi Akta Otentik.” Rechtide 12, no. 2 (2017): 28.
Indira Putrisari Fathika; dkk. “Akibat Hukum Dari Dibatalkannya Akta Jual Beli ‘Pura-Pura’ Oleh Pengadilan Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 859 PK/PDT/2019.” Indonesian Notary 3, no. 3 (2021): 122.
Ling Fransiska; dkk. “Degradasi Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Pembatalan Akta Autentik (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 2377K/PDT/2017 341.” Indonesian Notary 3, no. 2 (2021): 341.
Pomantow, Vivien. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Cacat Formil Berdasarkan Pasal 1869 KUHPerdata.” Lex Privatum 6, no. 7 (2018): 93.
Steven Liem; Mohamad Fajri; Widodo Suryandono. “Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Saham Tanpa Bukti Pelunasan Dan Bukti Setor (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor: 259/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Jkt.Sel.” Indonesia Notaris 2, no. 1 (2020): 790.
Laws and Regulations
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas,
Thesis
Wardani, Citra Ayu. “Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Yang Terindikasi Dokumen Palsu Dan Bersifat Perjanjian Pura-Pura (Simulasi) (Studi Kasus: Akta Akad Notaris X Pada Bank MM (Bersifat Syariah) Berkedudukan Di Bogor).” Universitas Indonesia, 2014.
Wulandari, Sri. “Peranan Notaris Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengalihan Saham.” Universitas Airlangga, 2013.
