Notary Liability for The Deed of General Meeting of Shareholders of Limited Liability Companies Against The Law (Analysis of Decision Number 123 / PDT. G-Interven/2019/PN. MKS)
Keywords:
Notary, Acts against the Law, Legal SanctionsAbstract
Abstract
Notary is a public official who has the authority to make an authentic deed. An authentic deed as regulated in Article 1868 of the Civil Code is a deed made in the form determined by law by or before a public official authorized to do so at the place where the deed was made. Based on the Law on Notary Positions, a Notary is a public official who is authorized to make an authentic deed and has other authorities as referred to in this Law or based on other laws. This study discusses the Notary's Responsibility for Unlawful Acts in making the deed of the general meeting of shareholders of a limited liability company. The research method used is juridical-normative research which refers to the use of written legal norms contained in statutory regulations. The data used in conducting research and collecting data is secondary data, namely as data obtained directly through tracing Court Decisions, library materials, document studies and interviews. The typology of this research is descriptive so that the results of this study are analytical. This study found that the authentic deed made by a notary that contained elements of forgery and fraud was void. The notary may be subject to administrative sanctions based on UUJN ranging from verbal reprimand, writing, temporary dismissal and disrespectful dismissal. In addition, the Notary can also be held accountable based on unlawful acts in a civil manner in accordance with Article 1365 of the Civil Code and forgery of letters based on the Criminal Code.
Downloads
References
Books
Agustina, Rosa. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Cet. 1. Jakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Alwesius. Dasar-Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris, Cet. 1. Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakulas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2019.
Amir Ilyas; Andi Maulana Mustamin. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan. Yogyakarta: Mahakarya Rangkang Offset, 2012.
Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata Di Bidang Hukum Kenotariatan Buku Kedua, Cet. 3. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2018.
E. Utrecht. Rangkaian Sari Kuliah, Hukum Pidana I Suatu Pengantar Hukum Pidana Untuk Tingkat Pelajaran Sarjana Muda Hukum Suatu Pembhasan Pelajaran Umum. Surabaya: Pustaka Tinta Mas, 2000.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2010.
Moelyatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Etika Profesi Hukum, Cet. 3. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Wawan Setiawan. “Sikap Profesionalisme Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Media Notariat (2004): 25.
Article Journal
Aprilia Putri Suhardini; Sukarmi. “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (2020): 269.
Dedy Pramono. “Kekuatan Pembuatan Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 3 (2015): 249.
Indah Sari. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11, no. 1 (2020): 53.
Ineke Bombing. “Pengawasan Terhadap Pejabat Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik.” Lex Privatum 2, no. 2015 (3AD): 109.
Rahmatdi, Aris. “Gugatan Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perselisihan Partai Golongan Karya.” Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 1 (2021): 84.
Rini Dameria; et.al. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindakan Medis Dan Penyelesaiannya Di Mahkamah Agung (Studi Kasus Perkara Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 352/PK/PDT/2010).” Dipenogoro Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2017): 5–6.
Utami, Sri. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Repertorium 3 (2015): 89.
Court Judgment
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Makassar Nomor 123/Pdt.G-Interven/2019/PN.MKS, n.d.
Thesis
Rizal, Nurman. “Implementasi UUJN Kaitannya Dengan Pengawasan.” Universitas Andalas, 2021.
Internet
Abi Jam’an Kurnia. “Jerat Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Memalsukan Akta Autentik.” Hukum Online. Last modified 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5c5a568ab332f/jerat-hukum-bagi-Notaris-yang-memalsukan-akta-autentik/.
Ginho, Leovin. “Analisis Atas Adanya Praktek Notaris Yang Ditetapkan Sebagai Pelanggaran Hukum Di Polresta Medan.” Jurnal Media Neliti. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164995-ID-analisis-atas-adanya-praktek-Notaris-yan.pdf.
Rosa Agustina; et.al. “Hukum Perikatan (Law of Obligations).” Pustaka Larasan, 2012. Last modified 2012. http://herlindahpetir.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2013/04/hukum-perikatan-contract-tort-law.pdf.
