Unconstitutional Legal Problems of the Job Creation Law against Local Working Patents in the Elimination of Article 20 of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents
Keywords:
Unconstutional, Patent, Local Working, Job CreationAbstract
Patent is a tool or tool aimed at disseminating technology and means in transferring technology so that patents can have a high social impact both through learning and economic progress of society in a country through technological developments. Patents are not only about granting the right to monopolize. However, it is also an award for technology to develop which will eventually have a good impact in the world of education and teaching as well as from the development of technology itself which aims also to increase the economic growth of the community. This method of research is normative juridical. The problem in this study is How is the problem of the application of local working after the abolition of article 20 in the UUPATEN? and then after the validity of Article 110 of the Job Creation Law for almost 1 year How is the polemic of the position of Article 20 of the UUPATEN and the achievement of TRIPs after the unconstitutional occurrence of the Job Creation Law based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91 / PUU-XIX / 2021? The conclusion of this study is that Article 20 of the Patent states that Bauwa requires patent holders to make products in Indonesia. So that Article 20 makes a conflict with Article 27 paragraph 1 trips agreement. the ratification of the JOB CREATION Law was then declared conditionally unconstitutional by the constitutional court and resulted in the regulations it had previously invited to patents.
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006a). Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006b). Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
BPHN. (2019). Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Kamil Idris. (2000). Kekayaan Intelektual Sebuah Kekuatan Untuk Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Kholis Roisah. (2015). Konsep Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Sejarah, Pengertian, dan Filosofi HKI dari Masa ke Masa). Malang: Setara Press.
Masnun; et.al. (2019). Persoalan Pengaturan Kewajiban Pemegang Paten untuk Membuat Produk atau Meggunakan Proses di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2), 329.
Michael; Halewood. (1997). Regulating Patent Holders: Local Working Requirements and Compulsory Licenses at International Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 35(2), 245.
Nurbaningsih, E. (2015). Naskah Akademik RUU tentang Paten. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Putusan Mahkamah konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XIX/2021.
Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi; David Hardiago. (2021). TRIP Agreement dan Standarisasi Hukum Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Industri di Indonesia. UIR Law Review, 5, 8.
Sardjono, A. (n.d.). Local Working Patent, Indonesia For Global Justice dikutip dari. Retrieved from https://igj.or.id/local-working-patent/
Syahroni, I. D. (2021). Legal Working Paten di Indonesia Berdasarkan TRIPs: Perbandingan India dan Sri Lanka. Journal of Private and Economic Law, 1(1), 3.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Paten.
UU Cipta Kerja Dinyatakan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat, Pemerintah segera Tindak Lanjuti Putusan MK. (n.d.). Retrieved from Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat website: https://lpjk.pu.go.id/uu-cipta-kerja-dinyatakan-inkonstitusional-bersyarat-pemerintah-segera-tindak-lanjuti-putusan-mk/
UU Cipta Kerja Dinyatakan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat, Uji Materiil Aturan Integrasi ke BRIN Tidak Dapat Diterima. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17863&menu=2
