Changes in the Marriage Agreement in Mixed Marriages in a Positive Indonesian Legal Perspective
Keywords:
Agreement, Marriage, Indonesian LawAbstract
Many cases may occur in some areas, where changes to the marriage agreement are made after the marriage takes place and the deed of amendment to the marriage agreement has been made by a notary. In view of Article 147 of the Civil Code which states that the Marriage Agreement is threatened with cancellation if it is not made by a Notary. The marriage agreement between the two prospective husband and wife is made, either in writing or in deed, either under the hand or in an authentic form made by an authorized public official. However, to provide maximum and binding protection for the parties concerned, the marriage agreement should be made in the form of an authentic deed. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the notary's responsibility for changes to the marriage agreement after the marriage and the legal consequences of changing the marriage agreement in mixed marriages for the husband and wife concerned and for third parties. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical, with a normative juridical approach. This research was conducted by means of library research and field research with data collection techniques through documentation studies and interviews as well as data analysis methods used in this study using qualitative juridical analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn: First, if the notary commits an unlawful act in the amendment of the marriage agreement which causes harm to a third party, the notary must be held accountable for his actions by being subject to civil sanctions in the form of reimbursement of costs or compensation to the party who violated the law. harmed; Second, the legal consequences of changing the marriage agreement which have been ratified by the Marriage/Marriage Registrar and made in a Notary deed, will bind and apply as law for the parties and third parties with an interest in the amendment to the marriage agreement.
Downloads
References
Book
Mohd. Idris Ramulyo, 1999. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Suatu Analisis Dari Undang-Undang Nomor :. 1 Tahun 1974 dan Komplikasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, h. 31.
Sulaiman Rasjid, 1992. Fiqh Islam. Bandung: Sinar Baru, h. 348.
R. Soebekti, 1995. Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, h. 15.
R. Soebekti, 2004. Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Waris. Jakarta: Intermasa, h. 8-9.
Wahyono Darmabrata dan Surini Ahlan Sjarif, 2002. Hukum Perkawinan dan Keluarga di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rizkita, h. 48.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2002. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia Legal Center Publishing, h. 30.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1996. Mengenal Hukum : Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, Yogyakarta, h. 82.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, h. 9.
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, 2004. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, h. 24.
Maria S.W. Sumardjono, 1989. Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM, h. 24-25.
R. Soetojo Prawirohamidjojo dan Martalena Pohan, 2008. Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Surabaya: Pusat Penerbit dan Percetakan Universitas Airlangga, h. 85.
Martiman Projohamidjojo. 2002. Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia Legal Center Publishing, h. 29.
Isnaeni Moch, 2016. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media, h.169.
Mochammad Djais, 2003. Hukum Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, h. 9.
Sjaifurrachman dan Habib Adjie. 2011. Aspek Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, h. 192.
Happy Susanto. 2014. Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Saat Terjadinya Perceraian. Jakarta: Visimedia, h. 97.
Tan Thong Kie. 2000. Studi Notariat Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, h. 153.
C. Asser-J. de Boer. 2001. Personen-en Familierecht. Zestiende Druk : Kluwer-Deventer, h. 301
Wahyono Darmabrata dan Surini Ahlan Sjarif. 2004. Hukum Perkawinan dan Keluarga di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, h. 83.
Soetojo Prawirohamidjojo dan Marthalena Pohan. 2000. Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Perceraian Di Indonesia dan Belanda. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, h. 74.
Legislation
Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Instruksi Presiden (Inpres) Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam
Putusan Mahkamah Kontitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015
journal
Seftia Azrianti. 2014. “Analisa Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan dan Akibat Hukumnya Bagi Para Pihak Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan”, Jurnal Petita, Volume 1 No. 2, h. 225.
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164410-ID-akibat-hukum-perjanjian-perkawinan-yang.pdf. , diakses pada 29 Agustus 2019, pukul 19.15 WIB.
Eva Dwinopati. 2017. “Implikasi dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XII/2015 terhadap Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Kawin yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, No.1 Vol 2 , 31.
Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI no.69/PUUXIII/2015, Seminar diadakan oleh Pengurus Wilayah (Pengwil) INI 7 IPPAT DKI Jakarta, tanggal 23 November 2016, di Hotel Sahid Sudirman, Jakarta.
Sonny Dewi Judiasih. 2017. “Pertaruhan Esensi Itikad Baik dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015”. Jurnal Notariil, Vol. 1, No. 2 Mei 2017, h. 35.
