The Notary's Liability Who Participated Doing Unlawful Acts in Making The Deed of Guarantee Submission Agreement Based on The Case Study of Decision Number 61/PDT.G/2019/PN.GIN
Keywords:
Deed of Guarantee Delivery Agreement, Notary, Unlawful ActsAbstract
A notary is a public official who is authorized by the state to make an authentic deed. If one of the parties feels aggrieved by the deed made by the Notary, that party can sue the Notary for the unlawful act committed. Notaries as public officials who have an important role in people's lives. In carrying out his position, it is not enough for a Notary to only have legal expertise but must also be based on responsibility and appreciation of the nobility of dignity and ethics. Its role and authority are very important for legal traffic in society. Therefore, a notary must carry out his profession professionally, highly dedicated and uphold the dignity and worth of by upholding the code of ethics of a notary. By enforcing the notary's code of ethics, it is very important for the notary to better understand the extent to which the act can be regarded as a violation of the code of ethics, and provide education so that things do not happen that can harm the notary and the community he serves. This study aims to examine the accountability of the Notary to the deed of guarantee delivery agreement that he has made based on Decision Number 61/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Gin. This research uses In this study the legal research method used is normative juridical. The approach used is a statutory approach. The analytical method used is qualitative, and the results of the research used are analytical explanatory. The findings in this study are the responsibility of the notary in making the guarantee agreement deed, proven to have committed an unlawful act and violated the provisions of Article 1365 of the Civil Code. The legal consequences given are the cancellation of the deed and dishonorable dismissal. It is recommended that the notary be more careful in making the deed so that problems do not occur in the future.
Downloads
References
Agus Budianto dan Gwendolyn Ingrid Utama. (2010). Aspek Jasa Pelayana nKesehatan dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Pasien. Karya Putra Darwati.
Bandem Isadnya; et.al. (n.d.). Akibat Hukum Perbuatan Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Hutang Piutang. Raad Kerta, 3(1), 21.
Edwar; et. al. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau dari Konsep Equality Before The Law. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), 180–200.
Kie, T. T. (2007). Studi Notariat & Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris. PT. Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Malayu S. Hasibuan. (1994). Manajamen Perbankan Dasar Dan Kunci Keberhasilan Perekonomian. Mas Agung.
Muhammad, A. (1993). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Oktaviani, L. (2015). Pelaksanaan Pemberian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Pada Debitur PT. Bank DKI Jakarta pusat. Lex Jurnalica, 12(2), 3.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 61/PDT.G/2019/PN.Gin.
Setiawan. (1992). Aneka Masalah Hukum dan Hukum Acara Perdata. Alumni.
Supriadi. (2015). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Pasal 7 huruf c.
Valayvi, Y. K. (2016). Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Milik Pihak Ketiga Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Di Lembaga Keuangan Perbankan Berdasarkan Undang - Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Private Law, 4(2), 2.
