Application For Bankruptcy By Creditors Perspective Of Law Number 37 Of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy And Suspension Of Debt Payment Obligations(Study of Decision Number 3/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst)
Keywords:
Application for Bankruptcy, Creditors, Bankruptcy LawAbstract
Settlement of debtors' debts to creditors through the bankruptcy process must meet the elements and requirements in filing an application for bankruptcy. In this case, the law requires that there must be two or more creditors and the non- payment of debts due to at least one creditor. The mechanism for the settlement of debtor assets in the event of bankruptcy is carried out by the Curator through several stages, namely: bankruptcy, verification meeting, making a list of debts and receivables of Bankruptcy, reconciliation and the stage of settlement of bankrupt assets. The basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a bankruptcy decision is in Decision Number 3/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst, namely considering whether or not the conditions in the bankruptcy petition are fulfilled by the bankruptcy applicants. Apart from taking into account the circumstances in which the Bankrupt Respondent was proven to have completely failed to pay its due debt to at least one creditor.
Downloads
References
Bakhtiar, Nur Yusriyyah, La Ode Husen, and Muhammad Rinaldy Bima. “Pemenuhan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Di Muka Umum.” Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) 1, no. 1 (2020): 41–58.
Damlah, Juditia. “Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 2 (2017): 91–98.
Devi, Ria Sintha. “Tinjauan Yuridis Sita Jaminan Dan Pemberesan Harta Milik Debitur Dalam Hal Terjadinya Kepailitan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek 4, no. 4 (2019): 102–110.
Drs. Susanti Adi Nugroho, SH., MH. “Hukum KePailitan Di Indonesia,” n.d.
Kurniawan, Hary. “Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Pada Kepailitan Melalui Perdamaian” (1952).
Kusumaningrum, Marthasia. “Perkembangan Pengertian Utang Menurut Undang - Undang Kepailitan Di Indonesia.” ???? ????? 66, no. July (2011): 37–39.
Mantili;, Rai, and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi; “Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Terkait Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Dalam Kepailitan” 6, no. 1 (n.d.): 1–19.
Ratnasari, Desi, Muhammad Iqbal Fasa, and A. Kumedi Ja’far. “Pandangan Hukum Islam Terhadap Status Muflis (Debitur Pailit) Sebagai Gharimin (Mustahik Zakat).” Reslaj?: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal 4, no. 3 (2022): 528–544.
Rizki, Muhammad. “ANALISIS HUKUM MENGENAI EFEKTIVITAS KURATOR DALAM KEPENTINGAN DEBITUR YANG DINYATAKAN PAILIT DI PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN (Studi Putusan NO. 2/ PDT.SUS – PAILIT/ 2016/ PN.NIAGA MDN),” no. 2 (2019).
Ronald Saija. “Perlindungan Kreditur Atas Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali Di Pengadilan Niaga.” Sasi 24, no. 2 (2018): 114–123.
Shahnaz, Fillya Brenda Pondaag, Hendrik Pondaag, and Vecky Gosal. “KAJIAN BENDA JAMINAN DEBITUR YANG DINYATAKAN PAILIT OLEH KREDITUR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG” 7, no. 2 (2018): 44–68.
Sianturi;, Ronald Hasudungan, Tengku Putra Muhammad Iqbal;, and Zaendrico Immanuel Ferdolin Hutabarat; “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hutang Yang Jatuh Tempo Dan Dapat Di Tagih Dalam Permohonan PKPU Dan Pailit Yang Diajukan Oleh Debitur.” Concept and Communication null, no. 23 (2019): 301–316.
