Execution of Scriplee Shares Secured in Fiduciary Security Following the Enactment of The Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019
Keywords:
Fiduciary Security Over Shares, Scripless Share, Capital MarketAbstract
Shares, as one of the securities traded on the Share exchange, can be issued in scripless form and the transaction settlement shall be carried out using book-entry settlement. The ownership of the scripless Share shall be evidenced in an electronic form, i.e. the ownership account at The Indonesia Central Securities Depository (KSEI) as the Depository and Settlement Institution in the Indonesian Capital Market. As a movable object, shares can be used as debt collateral, one of which mechanism shall use fiduciary security. However, In a fiduciary security system, the control of such collateral remains with the fiduciary grantor. In terms of scripless Share collateral, KSEI will block the pledged shares in KSEI’s account, therefore, the shareholder shall have no longer control over such shares. The position of the fiduciary grantee is prioritized over other creditors due to the executorial power deemed having the same legal force as a legally bound court decision. However, following the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the judicial review of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, there is a provision that any fiduciary execution cannot be carried out without an agreement among the parties regarding the default by the borrower. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical using a normative juridical approach bu utilizing secondary data i.e. regulations in capital market, fiduciary security and Constitution Court Judicial Review Decree.
Downloads
References
Ferdiansyah. (2016). Globalisasi Ekonomi, Integrasi Ekonomi Global, Dinamika Pasar Modal & Kebutuhan Standar Akuntansi Internasional,. Jurnal Akutansi, 8, 130.
Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hariyani, I. (2010). Buku Pintar Hukum Bisnis Pasar Modal, Strategi Tepat Investasi Saham, Obligsi, Waran, Right, Opsi, Reksadana, & Produk Pasar Modal Syariah. Vismedia.
https://www.ksei.co.id/about, diakses 12 Januari 2021. (n.d.).
J. Satrio. (2002). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia (1st ed.). Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Tahun 2019.
Nasarudin, M. Irsan, Indra Surya, Arman Neffe, & Adiwarman. (2011). Aspek Hukum Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jakarta: kencana media group.
Rizki Achmad. (2009). Saham Tanpa Warkat Sebagai Objek Jaminan. Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Rokhmatussa’dyah, & Ana, S. (2018). Hukum Investasi dan Pasar Modal . Jakarta: sinar grafika.
Salim H.S. (2017). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian (TPA Dua). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
The Group Of Thirty. (2008). The structure of Financial Supervision Approaches and Challenges in a Global Marketplace, (Washington D.C: TP, 2008), hlm. 21. Washington: TP.
Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. , Pub. L. No. Pasal 60.
Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Nomor 42 Tahun 1999, LN Nomor 168 Tahun 1999,. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia Pasal 1 angka 14. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia Pasal 3. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Pasal 15 ayat 2. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Tentang Pasar Modal. , Pub. L. No. Pasal 5 dan Penjelasan Pasa 83. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang tentang Pasar Modal . , Pub. L. No. 51 ayat 1. Indonesia.
Undang-Undang tentang Pasar Modal, Nomor 8 Tahun 1995, LN Nomor 64 Tahun 1995,. Indonesia.
