The Government's Role In Building Notary Professionalism
Keywords:
Notary Code of Ethics, Notary Public, The Role of Government, ProfessionalismAbstract
A notary is one of the legal professions that requires public trust, so a notary must be able to act professionally. Professionalism can be formed if the Notary in carrying out his duties remains guided by the Notary code of ethics and the Notary Position Act and utilizes information technology. However, the fact is that recently there have been many cases of violations committed by Notaries which ultimately violate the code of ethics and the Law on Notary Positions. For this reason, the role of the Government in minimizing violations in order to foster a professional attitude is very much needed. Based on these reviews, this study aims to examine the Government's efforts in building Notary professionalism. This study uses a normative juridical approach with data collection techniques through literature study. This study concludes that in building Notary professionalism, the Government, namely the President of the Republic of Indonesia together with the House of Representatives,stipulation of laws and regulations concerning Notary Positions, regulations concerning the establishment of the Notary Supervisory Council and Notary Honorary Council, regulations concerning the use of AHU Online, conducting guidance and supervision, as well as routine inspections. Meanwhile, if the Notary has violated the code of ethics, these agencies seek to impose sanctions as a follow-up to the violation.
Downloads
References
Adjie, Habib, I Komang Cri Khrisna. “Notaris The Run Bussines as the Land Broker” 08 (2022): 18–33.
Adjie Habib; Khistina I Komang Cri. “Notaries That The Run Bussines as The Land Broker,” n.d.
Adjie, Habib, and I Komang Cri Khrisna. “Notaries That The Run Bussines as The Land Broker,” n.d.
Annisa, Yanis Rinaldi, and Teuku Abdurahman. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Tidak Mendaftarkan Dan Melaporkan Akta Wasiat Ke Daftar Pusat Wasiat” 3, no. April (2019): 1–17.
Fitri, Irma Mulia, Ilyas Ismail, and Suhaimi. “Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Di Kabupaten Aceh Timur” 3, no. April (2019): 53–62.
Fonni, Winner Sitorus, and Hasbir Paserangi. “Persekutuan Perdata Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris” 2, no. 1 (2018): 73–82.
Immanuela, Chrisya Nadine, and Siti Hajati Hoesin. “AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS / PPAT TERKAIT PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH PEGAWAI NOTARIS / PPAT ( Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Blitar Nomor 10 / Pdt . G / 2020 / PN Blt ) Chrisya Nadine Immanuela *, Siti Hajati Hoesin **.” 08, no. 37 (2022): 1–17.
Mahendra, Made Ciria Angga. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Kesalahan Ketik Pada Akta Yang Dibuat Notaris.” Acta Comitas 4, no. 2 (2019): 227.
Michael L. Closen and Trever J. Orsingers. “Family Ties That Bind, And Disqualify: Toward Elimination Of Family-Based Conflict Of Interest In The Provision Of Notarial Services,” n.d.
Oktalina Safitri, Titin. “Pemalsuan Alat Bukti Atas Penitipan Uang Pajak Oleh Notaris/PPAT Dalam Menjalankan Tugas Jabatan.” Acta Comitas 4, no. 1 (2019): 109.
Putri, Nabila Mazaya, Program Studi, Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Indonesia, Henny Marlyna, Program Studi, Magister Kenotariatan, and Universitas Indonesia. “Pelanggaran Jabatan Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris Dalam Menjalankan Kewenangannya” 5 (2021): 63–77.
Sari, Sefriani amelia. “Reviewing A Notary Ethics Based On Ethical Code As A Notary Profession.” ??? ??????? 549, no. 3 (2017): 40–42.
Thaliasya, Aimee, Liza Priandhini, Mahasiswa Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Akta Hibah, and Pejabat Umum. “Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Hibah Dengan Menggunakan Keterangan Palsu” 07 (2021): 268–281.
Wahyudin, Wahyudin, and Jarot Widya Muliawan. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Notaris.” Borneo Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 36–48.
