Technological Advancement In The Society 5.0 Era For Notary In Indonesia: Glory Or Obsolete?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i3.333Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Notary, Technological Advancement, Society 5.0Abstract
The development of the legal profession is changing at an extraordinary speed, such as in the field of technology. The legal needs in society will be met by new entities, including technology companies that provide document creation systems and artificial intelligence systems to support legal services. But in the era of society 5.0, with digital advances and the emergence of artificial intelligence machines and big data, this eventually led to a change in the perspective and way of individuals in terms of law, which turned into an "alarm" for disruption to the legal profession, especially advocate offices. notaries, including courts, which at first were often ignored because of the emergence of artificial intelligence. This study aims to answer how the legal profession, especially the notary position, is associated with technological developments in the era of society 5.0. The research method used is normative juridical, in which the researcher examines this research by applying secondary data. The study of secondary data means the collection/study of data through literature studies, in the form of written regulations, books and journals. The author explores previous studies that discuss artificial intelligence in notary positions. The author also sees the latest developments in "competition" between the human legal profession, especially in the notary position and artificial intelligence. More sophisticated technology will replace something technological in nature, so the legal profession whose legal method is mechanical will be replaced by artificial intelligence that is faster and more accurate
Downloads
References
Akbar, M., & Yazid, F. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Dalam Kemudahan Berusaha Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Terkait Dengan Profesi Notaris. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian, 1(2), hlm. 116-124.
Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Press, 68(1), hlm.106-124.
Aritonang, N. (2021). Digitalisasi di lembaga hukum dan tantangan profesi hukum di masa depan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kewarganegaraan, 3(22), hlm. 1-4.
Campbell, R. W. (2012). Rethinking Regulation and Innovation in the U.S. Legal Services Market. Journal of Law & Bussiness, 9(1), hlm. 3-14.
Dan Hunter. (2020). The death of the legal profession and the future of law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 43(4), hlm.1199-1225.
Edwar, Rani, F. A., & Ali, D. (2019). Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Ditinjau Dari Konsep Equality Before The Law. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), hlm.280-201.
Elnizar, N. E. (2018). Artificial Intelligence dalam Industri Hukum, Menyongsong Masa Depan Dunia Hukum Tanpa Hakim dan Lawyer? Hukumonline.Com.
Kaplan, J. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
Kuncoro, M. (2009). Metode Riset untuk Bisnis & Ekonomi, bagaimana meneliti dan menulis tesis (p. hlm. 148). Erlangga.
Lawgeex. (2018). AI vs. Lawyers: The Ultimate Showdown.
O, J., McGinnis, & Pearce, R. G. (2014). Pearce, The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services (p. hlm. 3041). Fordham University.
Putro, W. D. (2020). Disrupsi Dan Masa Depan Profesi Hukum. Mimbar Hukum, 32(1), hlm. 19-29.
Raymond H Brescia. (2016). Four Questions at the Intersection of the Legal Profession and Technology, for Both Evangelists and Skeptics. Heinonline, 26(25), hlm. 388-398.
Rhyne, C. S. (1967). The Computer Will Speed a Law-Full World. American Bar Association Journal, 53(5), hlm. 420-424.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat) (p. hlm. 13-14). Rajawali Pers.
Susskind, R. (2015). The Future of The Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Expert (p. hlm. 279). Oxford University Press.
Susskind, R. (2017). Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction Your Future (p. hlm. 123-124). Oxford University Press.
Tan, D. (2020). Cyber-Notaries From A Contemporary Legal Perspective: A Paradox in Indonesian Laws and The Marginal Compromises to Find Equilibrium. Indonesia Law Review, 10(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n2.635
Tan, D. (2021a). A Brave New Frontier in the Dichotomous Indonesian Labour Law: Gig Economy, Platform Paradox and Workers Without Employers. Mimbar Hukum, 33(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v33i1.1956
Tan, D. (2021b). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas dan Mengulas Metodologi dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i8.2021.2463-2478
Tan, D., & Sudirman, L. (2020). Final Income Tax: A Classic Contemporary Concept to Increase Voluntary Tax Compliance among Legal Professions in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 125–170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.37308
Turner, K. (2016). Meet “Ross” The Newly Hired Legal Robot. The Washington Post.
