Legal Protection For Online Transportation Drivers In The Case Of Fictional Order In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i3.336Keywords:
Online Transportation, Legal Protection, Fictitious OrderAbstract
The development of technology and information has penetrated all aspects of life, one of which is the problem of transportation. Transportation is an important aspect for humans in their activities. Changes in the mass transportation system infiltrated by technological sophistication make conventional methods gradually abandoned. There are several companies that provide online transportation services due to the changing times that humans use for time efficiency and effectiveness. Among them are Gojek, Grab, and Maxim who have contributed greatly to helping the community's economy by creating millions of jobs. Behind the benefits that the company presents to partners and consumers, there is a serious problem that occurs, namely the existence of fictitious orders from several unscrupulous consumers that harm drivers. This study aims to unravel the problem of fictitious orders that occur and how the legal protection for the driver is related to the case that happened to him. The conclusion is that the company's efforts to protect drivers are only limited to solving problems internally. There has been no firm action in eradicating rogue consumers because if this continues, it will disrupt the performance of driversitself. Online transportation service companies must immediately evaluate services and make SOPs that are not only preventive in nature but also repressive in resolving cases firmly and thoroughly as regulated in the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law.
Downloads
References
Aminah, GYPS (2016). Legal Protection of Personal Data of Online Transportation Service Users from Misuse of Service Providers Based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3).
Chudri, AF Al. (2019). Islamic Law Review on Fictitious Order Crimes on Grab Indonesia Drivers. UIN Sunan Ampel.
Diab, WNAL (2021). Legal Protection for Online Drives Due to Fictitious Orders Judging from Law No. 13 of 2003 (Case Study of PT. Maxim Kendari City). Fawaid: Sharia Economic Law Review, 3(2).
Hakim, AA (2011). State of Law and Democracy in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Khakim, A. (2003). Introduction to Indonesian Labor Law. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Marpaung, YA (2021). Responsibility of PT. Grab Indonesia against Drivers Who Received Fictitious Orders. Era of Law: Scientific Journal of Legal Studies, 19(2).
Marzuki, PM (2010). Legal Research (6th Cet.). Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Legal Theory. Yogyakarta: Masterpiece Library.
Miro, F. (2005). Transportation Planning For Students, Planners, and Practitioners. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Muhammad, A. (2000). Indonesian Civil Law. Bandung: Image of Aditya Bakti.
Purwasih, E. (2010). Business Law. Bogor: Ghalia.
Rokhim, FFSAWA (2021). Criminal Sanctions for Online Ojeks and Online Taxis Proven to Make Fictitious Orders in terms of the Criminal Code and the ITE Law. Dynamics2, 27(9).
Sari, R. (2020). The Effect of Online Transportation on Driver Welfare in Bandar Lampung City in an Islamic Economic Perspective. Raden Intan State Isam University, Lampung.
Setiawan, RAGDA (2021). Law Enforcement against the Crime of Extortion Performed by Online Transportation Service Drivers Through Fictitious Messages (Fictitious Orders) Judging from the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008. Proceedings of Legal Studies, 7(2).
Setiono. (2004). Rule of Law (Supreme of Law). Sebelas Maret University.
Suliantoro, IRA (2020). Fictitious Orders against Gojek Drivers and Their Protection Efforts. Scientific Journal of Legal Dynamics, 21(1).
Waruwu, V. (2019). Criminal Liability of Online Ojek Fictitious Order Perpetrators That Caused Losses to the Company PT. Grab Indonesia. HKBP Medan University.
Willy Tanjaya, D. (2019). Legal Protection Against Online Transportation Companies in Fraudulent Fraudulent Orders. Prima Law Journal, 2(1).