Pardon's Judicial Urgency in Renewing Criminal Law in Indonesia

Authors

  • Satria Fajar Putra Dipayana Universitas Indonesia
  • Eva Achjani Zulfa Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i2.342

Keywords:

Urgency, Judicial Pardon, Criminal Law Reform

Abstract

This paper will examine the concept of judicial pardon (forgiving judges) as a solution to the existing legal problems, which are perceived as an attempt to avoid incarceration. The law gives the judge the authority to forgive or pardon the convict without imposing a crime or action if they are influenced by certain factors. This article aims to convey the importance of the RKUHP's concept of judicial pardon to the future renewal of the criminal justice system. This article's research employs a normative, statutory, and conceptual approach to the law. The findings of this study indicate that the concept of judicial pardon can be viewed as the final gatekeeper for a case that disrupts social justice, or as a guide for the forgiveness of judges that functions as a safety valve or emergency door. Then in accordance with the noble values that exist in Indonesian society, such as those of the people of Jambi province, the Batak Karo, the Balinese, and many others. In order for future generations of Indonesians to realize the welfare and protection of the community, as a form of legal certainty in sentence execution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, Y. (2013). Adang, Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Konsep, Komponen, dan Pelaksanaannya dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum.

Barlian, A. E. A., & Arief, B. N. (2017). Formulasi Ide Permaafan Hakim (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Law Reform, 13(1), 28–44.

Efendi, E. (2018). Hukum Pidana Adat Gagasan Pluralisme dalam Hukum Pidana dan Penerapan Hukum Menurut Keyakinan Hukum. PT Refika Aditama, Bandung, 20.

Efendi, J. (2018). Rekonstruksi dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim: Berbasis nilai-nilai hukum dan rasa keadilan yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Kencana.

Farikhah, M. (2018). Konsep Judicial Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) dalam Masyarakat Adat di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Media, 25(1).

Harahap, M. Y. (2012). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP penyidikan dan penuntutan Edisi kedua.

Harkrisnowo, H. (2013). Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2014). Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta.

Hutabarat, D. T. H., Salam, A., Zuwandana, A., al Azmi, C., Wijaya, C. R., Darnita, Tania, I., Lubis, L. K. A., Sitorus, M. A. P., Adawiyah, R., & Sinaga, R. (2022). Analysis Of The Implementation Of Law In Every Level Of Society In Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.80

Iswara, I. M. A. M. (2013). Mediasi penal penerapan nilai-nilai Restorative Justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana Adat Bali= The Penal mediation of Restorative Justice values application in adjustication of criminal offense of Balinese Custom.

Meliala, P. B. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Perhimpunan Penghuni Dan Pemilik Satuan Rumah Susun Terhadap Penghuni Rumah Susun (Studi Kasus Apartement Mediterania Palace Residence). Indonesian Notary, 2(1).

Pardon, R. (2020). Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim): Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(3).

Rahardjo, S., & Dimyati, K. (2014). Ilmu hukum: pencarian, pembebasan dan pencerahan. Muhammadiyah University Press.

Santoso, T. (2020). Hukum Pidana; Suatu Pengantar.

Saputro, A. A. (2016). Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 28(1), 61–76.

Soepomo, R. (1966). Bab-bab tentang hukum adat. Penerbitan Universitas.

Yusuf, A. (2017). Implementasi restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum oleh POLRI demi mewujudkan keadilan substantif. BUKU DOSEN-2016.

Zaidan, M. A. (2016). Dari Rehabilitasi Menuju Rekonsiliasi (Kasus Kelompok Rentan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum). Doctrinal, 1(2), 188–207.

Zulfa, T. S. D. E. A. (2015). Kriminologi, PT. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Dipayana, S. F. P., & Eva Achjani Zulfa. (2022). Pardon’s Judicial Urgency in Renewing Criminal Law in Indonesia. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(2), 1609–1616. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i2.342

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law