Juridical Analysis of Alleged Provision of False Information in Pretrial Corruption Cases of e-KTP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i2.346Keywords:
Pretrial, Corruption Eradication Commission, False StatementAbstract
On April 5 2017, the KPK named Miryam S Haryani as a suspect in the alleged corruption case of e-KTP with Investigation Order No. Sprint Dik-28/01/04/2017. For her actions, Miryam is suspected of violating Article 22 in conjunction with Article 35 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. On April 20, 2017, Miryam's legal team submitted a pretrial application stating that the KPK's determination of a suspect against his client was contrary to the law and the provisions of the applicable procedural law, because: a. The KPK does not have the authority to carry out investigations and investigations related to Article 22 of the Anti-Corruption Law, because Article 22 is regulated in Chapter III which is about other criminal acts related to corruption, so this is not the task and authority of the KPK as regulated in Article 6 Chapter II. KPK Law; b. The investigation into the criminal act of giving false information before the court is carried out based on article 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code; c. the determination of the suspect in the name of Miryam S Haryani was issued without two valid pieces of evidence. This study aims to determine the legal basis for determining the suspect as a pretrial object associated with the alleged criminal act of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani and to find out the authority of the KPK in investigating the case of the crime of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani in the e-KTP corruption case that was submitted for pretrial. at the South Jakarta District Court. The research method used is normative juridical, which is an approach to literature review as secondary data. The results of the study are, the legal basis for determining the suspect as an object of pretrial is the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 21/PUU-XII/2014 dated 28 April 2015, which provides prerequisites for the determination as a suspect, namely that a minimum of two pieces of evidence must be met as contained in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. If it is related to the alleged criminal act of giving false information by Miryam S Haryani, the pretrial application for the case number 47/Pid/Pra/2017/PN. Jkt. Sel, the determination of the suspect against Miryam S Haryani has been based on more than 2 (two) pieces of evidence.
Downloads
References
Amanda, U. (2021). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENERBITAN SURAT PERINTAH PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN ATAS SANGKAAN PEMALSUAN AKTA OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin).
Ang, D. N. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perluasan Alat Bukti Penyadapan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 4(1).
Barkatullah, A. H. (2020). Praperadilan: Sarana Perlindungan Tersangka dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (sesudah diedit editor).
Fauzi, T. A. R. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewajiban Notaris Menjaga Kerahasiaan Informasi Berkaitan Dengan Akta Dalam Pemberian Saksi Pada Proses Peradilan Pidana. NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM, 2(2), 43-53.
HANANI, D., Yuningsih, H., & Nurillah, I. (2022). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU DELIK MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN PALSU DI ATAS SUMPAH (Putusan Nomor: 6/Pid. B/2019/PN. Ngb dan Putusan Nomor: 96/Pid. B/2018/PN. Cms) (Doctoral dissertation, Sriwijaya University).
Hermanto, N. (2017). Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Permohonan Praperadilan Yang Diajukan Oleh Tersangka Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 36/Pid. Prap/2015/Pn. Jkt. Sel) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika Fakultas Hukum).
Kadarudin, A. W., & Rifa’i, M. (2021). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Pemberian Keterangan Palsu Oleh Kepolisian.
Kristi, K. J. (2011). Tinjauan yuridis pengajuan kasasi terhadap putusan bebas dalam perkara sumpah palsu (studi kasus dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor. 1234 K/Pid/2009).
Kusumawati, E. (2013). Tinjauan yuridis konstruksi hukum pembuktian hakim dalam membebaskan terdakwa dari dakwaan primair dan subsidair perkara menempatkan keterangan palsu dalam akta otentik dan upaya hukumnya oleh penuntut umum (studi kasus dalam putusan pengadilan negeri i.
Laowo, Y. S. (2018). Jurnal Hukum Analisis Yuridis Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Education and Development, 4(1), 86-86.
Mansyah, M. S. (2019). Penafsiran Keterangan Palsu Dalam Persidangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dengan Kaitannya Kasus Obstruction of Justice. Justicia Islamica, 16(1), 61-78.
Multazam, I. (2017). Peran Penyidik Kepolisian dan KPK dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Alauddin Makassar).
Nawir, N. (2021). Analisis hukum acara pidana Islam terhadap fungsi Dewan Pengawas Kpk dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi: analisis pasal 21 Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kpk (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).
Pangaribuan, P., & Fitriadi, A. (2021). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DALAM TAHAP PENYELIDIKAN DUGAAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Journal de Facto, 7(2), 194-213.
Pradewi, A. M., & Wijaya, F. (2018). ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI YANG SAMA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA YANG BERBEDA (STUDI KASUS SETYA NOVANTO DALAM PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 97/PID. PRAP/2017/PN. JKT. SEL). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(1), 74-96.
Sari, T. P. (2010). Analisis konstruksi hukum upaya paksa penyadapan oleh komisi pemberantasan korupsi (KPK) dalam penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi (Telaah Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi).
Suwito, E. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Keberadaan Saksi Sebagai Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborators Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Sosial dan Keagamaan, 9(1), 81-103.
Thamrin, H., Linanda, A., & Rifa’i, M. (2021). Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Pemberian Keterangan Palsu Dalam Persidangan Oleh Pihak Kepolisian. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 4(1), 1-12.
Tornado, A. S., SH, M., & Kn, M. (2019). Praperadilan: Sarana Perlindungan Tersangka dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Nusamedia.
ZULFIANA, E. (2017). ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS AKTA OTENTIK YANG DIBUAT BERDASARKAN DATA DAN KETERANGAN PALSU (Doctoral dissertation, Untag Surabaya).
