Pancasila Democracy: Non-Systemic Legal Studies Charles Sampford
Keywords:
Pancasila Democracy, Non-Systemic Law, Charles SampfordAbstract
The ethical orientation of the ideals of Pancasila democratic law as desired by the founding fathers is contained in the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia paragraph IV, a structure of the Republic of Indonesia is formed which is sovereignty of the people based on the state philosophy, namely the values of "divinity , humanity, unity, deliberation and justice ”, have not been fully implemented. The purpose of this research is to analyze Pancasila democracy concept when viewed from non-systemic law Charles Sampford.This study uses a philosophical normative approach combined with a qualitative descriptive analysis. The results show that the concept of non-systemic legal science provides an alternative to different reading models of Pancasila as a complete and holistic system, both in terms of meaning and relations. The characteristic of deliberation in Pancasila Democracy is that differences are basically aimed at finding equality, descriptively, that deliberation is allowed to remain in differences, because in essence there are differences.
Downloads
References
Absori (et.,al), Hukum Profetik : Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Hukum Non- Sistemik, Yogyakarta : GENTA Publishing, 2015
Ajat Sudrajat, Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Sejarah, MOZAIK: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora . Vol. 8 No. 1 Tahun 2016. journal.uny.ac.id
Aidul Fitriciada Azhari, Tafsir Konstitusi : Pergulatan Mewujudkan Demokrasi Di Indonesia,Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing, 2017.
___________________, Negara Hukum Indonesia: Dekolonisasi dan Rekonstruksi Tradisi, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM NO. 4 VOL. 19 OKTOBER 2012: 489 - 505
Ali Harb, Kritik Kebenaran, LKis, Yogyakarta : 1995
Anthon F. Susanto, Ilmu Hukum Non Sistemik : Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing, 2010
Bagir Manan (ed), Kedaulatan Rakyat, Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Negara Hukum, Jakarta : Gaya Media Pratama, 1996
Dede Sri Kartini, Retrospeksi Konsepsi Demokrasi Pancasila Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Globalisasi,http://download.garuda.ristekdikti.go.id/article, diakses 7 Februari 2021
F. Budi Hardiman, “ Demokrasi Deliberatif : Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas, “ Yogyakarta : Kanisius, 2009
Inna Junaenah, Kontribusi Tatanan Islam Terhadap Demokrasi Permusyawaratan Di Indonesia , Ahkam: Vol. XVI, No. 2, Juli 2016
Kelik Wardiono, Chaos Theory: Sebuah Ancangan Dalam Memahami Hukum, JURNAL ILMU HUKUM, Vol. 15, No. 2, September 2012
Khudzaifah Dimyati, Kelik Wardiono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Surakarta: UMS Press, Geogle Scholar, diunduh 18 Juli 2018
________________, ( et .al) , Hukum Dan Moral Basis Epistemologii Paradigma Rasional H.L.A Hart, Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing, Cetakan pertama, 2017
Materi Sosialisasi Empat Pilar Mpr Ri, Jakarta : Sekretariat Jendral DPR RI, 2018
Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Negara Hukum, Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya Dilihat Dari Segi Hukum Islam, Implementasiny6a Pada Periode Negara Madinah Dan Masa Kini, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992
Muhammad Hanafi , Kedudukan Masyawarah dan Demokrasi di Indonesia, Jurnal Cita Hukum. Vol. I No. 2 Desember 2013. ISSN: 2356-1440
Suyuthi Pulungan, Prinsip-Prinsip Pemerintahan Dalam Piagam Madinah, Yogyakarta : Ombak, 2014,
Taufiq Muhammad Asy – Syawi, Fiqhusy – Syura Wal Istisyarat, Penerjemah Djamaludin, (Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1997
Yudi Latif, Negara Paripurna: Historisitas, Rasionalitas Dan Aktualitas Pancasila, Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2012
_________Revolusi Pancasila, Bandung : Mizan, 2015
