Juridic Review On Civil Decisions Which Was Not Executed Because Of Resistance In The Tobelo State Court" (Judiction Analysis Number 11/Pdt.G/2011/Pn.Tbl
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i4.461Keywords:
Execution, Third Parties, resistanceAbstract
This study is to find out the legal actions taken in the execution of the Tobelo District Court and what are the causes of the non-execution of the object in case Number 11/Pdt.G/2011/PN.TBL which has permanent legal force (inkracht). This research is a normative legal research, namely research that focuses on examining the decision of the Tobelo District Court regarding claims for land ownership without rights and why the decisions of the Tobelo court judges who already have legal force are still hampered in the execution process. The source of data used in this study is secondary data, namely data obtained from library research and documents, which are the results of research and processing of others, which are already available in the form of books or documents that are usually provided in libraries, or privately owned. In legal research, secondary data includes primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that this decision cannot be executed due to resistance to the object by third parties and the defendants / defendants. There were also executions that were hampered because when the execution confiscation was about to be placed on the object of the case, it turned out that the object of the case had changed hands to a third party due to the National Land Agency (BPN) continuing to process the transfer of names or the issuance of a new certificate on the object of the dispute. Upon the request for execution, a third party who also feels that they have the right to the object of the dispute then submits another rebuttal or resistance to the execution.
Downloads
References
Arto, Mukti. 2004, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Bachar, Djazali. 1987, Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perdata Segi Hukum Dan Penfegakan Hukum, Jakarta, Akademika Pressindo.
Balitbang Diklat Kumdil MA RI. 2007. Buku Pedoman Teknis Administrasi dan Teknis Peradilan Perdata Umum.
Bratawijaya, Johanes. 2002, Eksekutabilitas Putusan Peradilan Perdata (Penelitian Asas, Norma, Dan Praktek Penerapannya), Jakarta, Puslitbang Hukum Dan Peradilan Badan Libang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI.
Fuady, Munir. 2007, Dinamika Teori Hukum, Bogor, Ghalia Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2010, Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2010. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata Edisi Kedua, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Mappong, H. Zainuddin. 2010, Eksekusi Putusan Serta Merta (Proses Gugatan Dan Cara Membuat Putusan Serta Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Perkara Perdata), Malang, Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.
Makarao, Taufik, Mohammad. 2004, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.
Mulyadi, Lilik. 1998, Hukum Acara Perdata Menurut Teori Dan Praktik Peradilan Indonesia, Jakarta, Djambatan.
Mulyadi, Lilik. 2007, Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Surabaya, Bina Ilmu.
Nasution, M. Syukri Albani. 2017, Hukum Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat, Jakarta, Kencana.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2020 Teori hukum strategi tertib manusia lintas ruang dan generasi buku baru pengarang. penerbit Gebta Publishing.
Rasaid, M. Nur. 2003, Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika Offset.
Samosir, Djamanat 2011, Hukum Acara Perdata : Tahap-Tahap Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata, Bandung, Nuansa Aulia.
Santoso, M. Agus. 2014, Hukum, Moral dan Keadilan Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Hukum, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta, Kencana.
Soeroso, R. 1993, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, PT Sinar Grafika.
Suyuthi, Wildan. 2004, Sita Eksekusi Praktek Kejurusitaan Pengadilan, Jakarta, PT. Tatanusa.
Swantoro, Herri. 2018, Dilema Eksekusi (Ketika Eksekusi Perdata Ada di Simpang Jalan Pembelajaran dari Pengadilan Negeri), Cetakan 1, Jakarta, Rayyana Komunikasindo
Yustianing, Melani, dkk. 2014. “Tinjauan Perlawanan untuk Menunda Eksekusi dalam Sengketa Perdata (Studi Kasus Perkara No:8/Pdt.Plw/2000/PN Probolinggo)”. Jurnal Verstek Vol.2 No.3
LEGISLATION
HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement)
RGB (Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten)
RV (Reglement of de Rechts Vordering)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
DECISION
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo Nomor: 11/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Tbl
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo Nomor: 16/Pdt.Plw/2017/PN.Tob
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Maluku Utara Nomor: 17/Pdt/2011/PT.Malut
Putusan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 2041 K/Pdt/2012
Putusan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 484 PK/Pdt/2015
OTHER SOURCES
Fara Divana, Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Pamekasan, Diakses Pada Laman : http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/PPKN/article/view/6210, Pada Tanggal 20 Januari 2022, Pukul 14.50 WIT.
Fence M. Wantu, Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 12 No. 3 September 2012.
Robitum Maftukh Zakariyah dan Ahmad Riyadh U.B., Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang tidak dapat Dilaksanakannya Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Perdata yang Telah Mempunyai Kekuatan Hukum Tetap, Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review Vol 11 (2020): July, 10.21070/ijppr.v11i0.1162 Regulatory Policy
Riswanda Harvianto, Heri Hartanto, Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Sebagian Obyek Eksekusi Yang Dikuasai Pihak Ketiga, Jurnal Hukum Acara Vol 7, No 1 (2019)
Tarsi, Eksekusi Antara Teori Dan Praktik Dalam Hukum Perdata, Diakses Pada Laman :http://pa-stabat.net/index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id=7852:eksekusi-eksekusi-antara-teori-dan-praktik-dalam-hukum-perdata-&catid=37:kumpulan-artikel&Itemid=685, Pada Tanggal 19 januari 2022, Pukul 12.51 WIT.
Wati Trisnawati, Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Yang Tidak Dapat Dilakukan Eksekusi (Non Executable), Vol. 1 No. 7 (2020): Jurnal Syntax Admiration, https://jurnalsyntaxadmiration.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/128
