Juridic Review Concerning The Position Of Joint Assets After Post Divorce Analysis Of Civil Decision Number 343/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Tte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i4.462Keywords:
Joint Assets, Post Divorce, Prenuptial Agreement, Religious CourtsAbstract
A marriage agreement is an agreement made before the marriage takes place and binds the two prospective brides who will be married, its contents regarding the issue of the distribution of assets between husband and wife which includes what belongs to the husband or wife and what is the responsibility of the husband and wife, or related to property. In the event of a divorce or death in one of the partners, usually a prenuptial agreement is made for legal purposes for each other's property, husband or wife. Making a prenuptial agreement is allowed as long as it does not conflict with law, religion and decency, moral values ??and customs. All legal actions related to joint property must have the consent of both parties, in this case husband and wife, if it is violated, the consequences of the act are one of the parties can file an objection. Based on the description above regarding the existence of joint property of husband and wife, there are many cases regarding this joint property, such as the case that was submitted to the Ternate Religious Court where between husband and wife who are going to divorce dispute their joint assets after the divorce decision has permanent legal force. Which aims to analyze how the mechanism for the distribution of joint property after divorce without a prenuptial agreement. and what are the legal consequences if one of the parties does not carry out the decision of the Religious Court judge regarding the distribution of joint property which already has permanent legal force. By using a normative juridical research method, which is a type of sociological legal research and can be referred to as field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what has occurred in people's lives. This study uses a statutory approach, a concept and case approach. Especially in this case regarding the analysis of the agreement in the Civil Code and the regulation of joint property and the strength of the judge's decision. From the results of the discussion, it was revealed that with respect to these objects, at trial the Defendant was also unable to show proof of ownership and year of acquisition, nor could the proposed witnesses explain the type, year of acquisition and status of the object, as well as during an on-site examination of the object. the intended object is not found, so that the object must be declared unproven and deserves to be declared unacceptable; Whereas based on the provisions of Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage jo. Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law, because the marriage has been broken up due to divorce, then for the assets that are designated as joint property of the Plaintiff and Defendant, each Plaintiff and Defendant are entitled to one-half of the joint property. So that in the Court's Decision, the Judge granted the Plaintiff's claim in part and determined that the Plaintiff and Defendant were each entitled to (half) of the joint property
Downloads
References
Ahmad Azhar Basyir, 2014, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, Yogyakarta, UII Press.
Amir Syarifuddin, 2009, Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia Antara Fiqh Munakahat Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Jakarta, Kencana.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus, 2010 Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan, Jakarta, Citra Aditya Bakti.
Boedi Abdullah Dan Beni Ahmad Saebani, 2013, Perkawinan & Perceraian Keluarga Muslim, Bandung, Pustaka Setia.
Hadikusuma Hilman, 2007, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia Menurut Perundangan, Hukum Adat, Hukum Agama, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Isnaeni, Moch, 2016, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia, Bandung, Refika Aditama.
Muhammad Syarifuddin Dkk, 2014, Hukum Perceraian, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Mr. A. Soehardi, Pengantar Hukum Adat, Bandung, Vornik On Hoeve.
Philipus M. Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia, Surabaya, PT Bina Ilmu.
Rosnidar Sembiring, 2016, Hukum Keluarga : Harta-harta Benda Dalam Perkawinan , Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
R. Soeroso, 1993, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, PT Sinar Grafika.
Salim H.S. 2003, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW), Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Soemiyati, 1999, Hukum Perkawinan Islam Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan (Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974, Tentang Perkawinan), Yogyakarta, Liberty.
Sony Dewi Judiasih, 2015, Harta Benda Perkawinan : Kajian Terhadap Kesetaraan Hak Dan Kedudukan Suami Dan Isteri Atas Kepemilikan Harta Dalam Perkawinan, Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Subekti, R, 2003, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta, Intermasa.
Tutik, Titik Triwulan, 2008, Hukum Perdata Dan Sistem Hukum Nasional, Jakarta, Prenada Media Group
LEGISLATION
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Kompilasi Hukum Islam
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.
DECISION
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Ternate Nomor : 343/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tte
OTHER SOURCES
Azmil Fauzi Fariska, Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Perkara Harta Bersama, Journal Hukum Islam Vol. 21 No. 1 Juni 2021.
Beri Risky, Konsep Pembagian Harta Bersama Menurut Hukum Islam dan UndangUndang Perkawinan, LENTERA Indoesia Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari – Juni 2020.
Budiono, Herlien, Het Venwichtsbeginsel Voor Het Indonesische Contractenrecht, Contractrechtten Of Indonesische Beginselen Geschoeid, Diterjemahkan Ke Dalam Bahasa Indonesia Dengan Judul Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia, Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2006.
Departemen Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Pertama, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 1988.
Evi Djuniarti, Hukum harta Bersama ditinjau dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan KUH Perdata, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, Vol. 17 No.4, Desember 2017.
http://misaelandpartners.com/pembagian-harta-bersama-pasca-perceraian/
Mike Rini, Perlukah Perjanjian Pra Nikah?, Danareksa Online, 2 Maret 2005, (Http://Www.Danareksa.Com/Home/Index-Uangkita.Cfm?Act=), Diakses Pada 11 Januari 2022, Dikutip Dalam Ahmad Dahlan Dan Firdaus Albar, Perjanjian Pranikah : Solusi Bagi Wanita, Jurnal (Pusat Studigender STAIN Puwpkerto, 2008).
Muhammad Tigas Pradoto, 2014, Aspek Yuridis Pembagian Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perdata), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Jurnal Jurisprudence; Print ISSN: 1829-5045 | Online ISSN (e-ISSN): 2549-5615
Ruhimat, Mamat. Teori Syirkah, 2017 Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Bagi Istri Yang Berkarir Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Serta Prakteknya Di Pengadilan Agama, ‘Adliya Vol. 11, No. 1.
Waha, Felicitas Marcelina, 2013, Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Harta Perkawinan Setelah Bercerai, Jurnal Lex et Societatis, Vol.I No.1,Jan-Mrt,2013.
Wahjono, Darmabrata dan Surini, Ahlan Sjarif, 2016, Hukum Perkawinan dan Keluarga di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Wathan, Hubbul. Indra, 2019, Keabsahan Pelaksanaan Harta Bersama Sebagai Implementasi Akad Syirkah, Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Yusuf Iskandar, 2019, Skripsi, Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Pra Nikah Dalam Hukum Perdata Di Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
