The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption

Authors

  • Muhammad Fuad Azwar R Universitas Hasanuddin
  • M. Said Karim Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Haeranah Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.515

Keywords:

Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture;, Perampasan Aset;, Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal regulations against mechanism of assets confiscation that exist in Indonesian positive law as well as to analyze the concept of non-conviction based asset forfeiture as a legal policy in assets ccriminal action of corruption. The type of research that used is normative (legal research) or doctrinal. The results of this research shows that asset confiscation regulations in indonesia’s current positive law carried out by handling criminal forfeiture and civil forfeiture but the regulations still based on criminal evidence first (follow the suspect) and criminal law still places the seizure of assets as an additional crime. Indonesia has ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC 2003) through law no. 7 of 2006 which then as a follow-up to the government in the renewal step publishes the draft law on the confiscation of assets for criminal actions which is expected to be the beginning of the asset seizure regime by focusing on efforts to return the assets (follow the money) where UNCAC as an international instrument proposes ratifying countries to apply the concept of asset forfeiture without relying depends on the sentencing of the perpetrator (non-conviction based asset forfeiture) as an effort to eradicate criminal action of corruption. The NCB concept is an effective solution to maximize the return of state losses through foreclosure and taking over of an asset in rem or lawsuit against assets as a form of criminal law policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brun, J. P. (2011). Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide of Practioners. Washington D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

Husein, Y. (2012). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana di Indonesia (Asset Forfeiture of Crime in Indonesia). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 7(4), 41.

Irwansyah, & Yunus, A. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Ishaq. (2007). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Pohan, A. (2008). Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Anti Korupsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada dan Kemitraan.

Ramelan. (2015). Laporan Hasil Penyelarasan Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1) doi: 10.32267/integritas.v3i1.158., 115-130, .

Sofyan, A. M. (2020). Hukum Acara Pidana Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Kencana.

Supomo. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: PT. Pradoyo Paramita.

Watch, I. C. (2022, Maret 23). Kompas. Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/03/22/17391501/icw-sebut-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-di-tahun-2020-meningkat-4-kali.

Wiarti, J. (2017). Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Langkah Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara: Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Hukum. UIR Press, doi: 10.25299/ulr.2017.1.01.154.

Yunus, I. &. (2020). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-03

How to Cite

R, M. F. A., M. Said Karim, & Haeranah. (2022). The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(5), 2613–2622. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.515

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law