Criminal Law Reform Double Track System (Rehabilitation Versus Prison) On Against The Crime Of Narcotics Abuse In Indonesia

Authors

  • Nelvitia Purba Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Mukidi Mukidi Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara
  • Muhlizar Muhlizar Universitas Al Washliyah Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.520

Keywords:

Criminal Law Reform, Double Track System, Rehabilitation, Narcotics Abuse

Abstract

Efforts to prevent and eradicate drug abuse are urgent because they can have a systemic effect. Therefore, it is necessary to renew article 127 of Law no. 35 of 2009 (Double Track System) for handling narcotics abuse which so far has emphasized criminal sanctions rather than action sanctions. This research uses normative legal research or can be referred to as doctrinal legal research. The analysis of legal material used is descriptive analysis. The results of the study concluded  (1). The position of criminal  sanctions  and  actions    based  on  article  127  Law Number 35 of 2009   it is clear that there is a regulation, but its application to narcotics abuse has not been effective because it does not take into account the physical and psychological conditions of the perpetrator, which should focus more on rehabilitation than imprisonment (2). The reform of the Criminal Law article 127  Law Number 35 of 2009 (Rehabilitation versus Prison) against narcotics abusers must be carried out immediately because it concerns the future of the nation and also provides aspects of protection and aspects of the public interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics.” http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/JICA Mirror/english/4868_UU_35_2009_e.html (accessed Jan. 19, 2022).

B. N. N. R. Indonesia, Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Sejak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia, 2008.

K. Bahagiati, “FILSAFAT PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA BAGI DIRI SENDIRI DAlAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM,” no. 35, pp. 114–140, 2012.

“24.878 Orang Ditangkap Terkait Kasus Narkoba di Indonesia sejak Januari 2021.” https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/06/14/16303771/24878-orang-ditangkap-terkait-kasus-narkoba-di-indonesia-sejak-januari (accessed Jan. 21, 2022).

R. WP, Aspek pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika?: rehabilitasi versus penjara, Pertama. Yogyakarta: Legality, 2017.

G. H. Sukoco, “STRATEGI PENCEGAHAN, PEMBERANTASAN DAN REHABILITASI PENYALAHGUNA NARKOBA PADA KALANGAN PELAJAR DAN MAHASISWA DI KOTA SEMARANG OLEH BNNP JATENG | Sukoco | Journal of Politic and Government Studies.” https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/17693/16892 (accessed Jan. 20, 2022).

N. P. Y. D. Putri and S. P. M. . Purwani, “Urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana di indonesia,” J. Kertha Wicara, vol. 9, no. 8, 2020.

B. Waluyo, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek, Cetakan 2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996.

S. Soekanto and S. Mamudhi, Penelitian hukum normatif?: suatu tinjauan singkat, 17th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Amiruddin and Z. Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, IX. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

G. E. M. Anscombe, “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 124, pp. 1–9, 1958, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3749051.

E. . Kanter and S. . Sianturi, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya, XXI. Jakarta: Storia Grafika, 2002.

S. Sulistyawati, I. Setiawan, and B. Hermanto, “Implementation of Double Track System Model: Criminal Sanction and Action as A Criminal System for The Implementation of Criminal Actions of Narcotic Use in Narcotics in The National Class II A Agency Institute of Kabupaten Langkat,” J. Mercat., vol. 13, no. 1, 2020.

Y. A. Fajrin and A. F. Triwijaya, “Arah Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia di Tengah Pluralisme Hukum Indonesia,” Ekspose J. Penelit. Huk. dan Pendidik., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 734–740, 2019, doi: 10.30863/ekspose.v18i1.361.

B. N. Arief, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana: Dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan, 1st ed. Bandung: Anggota IKAPI, 2005.

R. Pradityo, “MENUJU PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA?: SUATU TINJAUAN SINGKAT ( TOWARDS CRIMINAL LAW REFORM OF INDONESIA?: AN OVERVIEW ),” pp. 137–144, 2017.

Failin, “Sistem pidana dan pemidanaan di dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana indonesia ?,” J. Cendekia Huk., pp. 14–31, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://e-jurnal.stih-pm.ac.id/index.php/cendekeahukum/article/view/6/14.

T. Prasetyo, Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, 1st ed. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.

M. Sholehuddin, Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana?: Ide Dasar Sistem Jalur Ganda dan Implementasinya, 1st ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

R. Belarminus, “BNN: Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Itu Konstitusional, Jangan Dikurangi,” Kompas.com, 2015. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2015/06/25/21025701/BNN.Hukuman.Mati.di.Indonesia.Itu.Konstitusional.Jangan.Dikurangi (accessed Jan. 21, 2022).

E. Napitupulu, “ICJR: RI Akan Segera Masuki Era Baru Sistem Peradilan Anak | ICJR,” 2014. https://icjr.or.id/icjr-ri-akan-segera-masuki-era-baru-sistem-peradilan-anak/ (accessed Jan. 20, 2022).

B. N. Arief, Bunga rampai?: Kebijakan Hukum Pidana?: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru, 7th ed. Jakarta: Kencana prenada media group, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-03

How to Cite

Purba, N., Mukidi, M., & Muhlizar, M. (2022). Criminal Law Reform Double Track System (Rehabilitation Versus Prison) On Against The Crime Of Narcotics Abuse In Indonesia. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(5), 2727–2733. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.520

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law