Patterns of Perception in Policy Formulation: Content and Trust in Compilation of the 2020 Revised APBD Draft in Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.560Keywords:
Perception patterns, Policy actors, Policy formulationAbstract
The pattern of perception is the result of the perception of individual actors which can develop through interactions between actors in the process of formulating public policies. The formulation of the ABPD change consists of actors who have the interests of both the government and the legislature to reach an agreement. The purpose of this research is to find out the pattern of perceptions between actors in the formulation of the 2020 Revised APBD in Makassar City. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative model that seeks to explain phenomena in depth through interviews, observations, and field documentation. The technique of analyzing data from research results is carried out through data triangulation so that the data obtained can be relevant to existing concepts. The results of the study show that the perception pattern in the formulation of the Makassar City APBD draft among the actors involved has various perceptions which causes no agreement between the actors. This can be seen from two main aspects, namely content and level of trust. the substance of the draft APBD The proposed changes are considered not fully oriented towards the public interest and are considered to have unclear aims and objectives. The lack of clarity on the objectives of the activities to be carried out in the proposed revised APBD has not been able to create a good level of trust for all actors, especially for the legislative group. So in conclusion it is necessary to discuss the budget which focuses on issues that are oriented to the public interest.
Downloads
References
Barthwal, C. P., & Sah, B. L. (2008). Roles of Governmental Agencies in Policy Implementations. Indian Political Science Association , 69(3), 457–472.
Bertscher, A., London, L., & Orgill, M. (2018). Unpacking policy formulation and industry influence: the case of the draft control of marketing of alcoholic beverages bill in South Africa. Health Policy and Planning, 33(7), 786–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czy049
Carlsson, L. (2000). Policy Networks as Collective Action. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02045.x
Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2017). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Routledge.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks.
Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). study public policy: Principles and Processes (Four). Oxford university press.
Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. CRC Press.
Jones, C. O. (1970). Introduction to the study of public policy. Cole Publishing Company.
Klijin, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). The shift toward network governance: Drivers, characteristics and manifestations. In Theory and practice of public sector reform. Routledge.
Klijn, E. H., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., & Jeffares, S. (2016). Public Managers, Media Influence, and Governance. Administration & Society, 48(9), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714527752
KLIJN, E.-H., STEIJN, B., & EDELENBOS, J. (2010). THE IMPACT OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT ON OUTCOMES IN GOVERNANCE NETWORKS. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x
Lane, C., & Bachmann, R. (1998). Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications. Oxford University press.
Lysons, B., & Mehta, J. (1997). Private sector business contracts: the text between the lines (S. F. Deakin, Ed.). Oxford University press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168.
Sanusi, A. (2011). Business research methodology. Salemba Empat.
Sugiyono. (2016). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta .
Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.
