Youtube Content as an Object Of Fiduciary Guarantee in a Debt Receivable Agreement
Keywords:
Youtube Contents, Digital Assets, Fiduciary GuaranteesAbstract
Government Regulation Number 24/2022 (PP 24/2022) has just regulated the provision of guarantees for intellectual property created by creative economy actors. YouTube content as one of the copyrighted works is included in the intellectual property in question. Even though it has been regulated, the government is still making preparations for its implementation. Where it is still not clear the scheme and its implementation. Based on this, the problems are formulated, how to measure YouTube content as a digital asset and how YouTube content can be used as an object of fiduciary security in a debt agreements. The result is that YouTube content can be regarded as a digital asset based on the economic value or income generated from the adsense feature. This income, later could become a value in fiduciary guarantees. The advice that can be given in this study is the need for good supervision in creating schemes and best implementation of making YouTube content an object of fiduciary guarantees in debt agreements.
Downloads
References
Anak Agung Gede Mahardhika Geriya. (2021). Pelanggaran dan Kebijakan Perlindungan Hak Cipta di YouTube”, . Jurnal Living Law, 13(2), 100–110.
David Nelmark. (2004). “Virtual Property: The Challenges of Regulating Intangible, Exclusionary Property Interests such as Domain Names. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 3(1), 1–19.
Gatot Supramono. (2010). Hak Cipta dan Aspek-aspek Hukumnya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Gatot Supramono. (2013). Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Jakarta: Kencana.
Haris Munandar, & Sally Sitanggang. (2008). Mengenal HAKI Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Hak Cipta, Paten, Merek Dan Seluk Beluknya. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Indonesia. Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Cipta, UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, LN Nomor 266, Tahun 2014, TLN Nomor 5599, Ps. 12.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Cipta, UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, LN Nomor 266, Tahun 2014, TLN Nomor 5599. , Pub. L. No. 16 ayat (2) huruf a (2014).
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Cipta, UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, LN Nomor 266, Tahun 2014, TLN Nomor 5599, Ps. 1 angka 1.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Hak Cipta, UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2014, LN Nomor 266, Tahun 2014, TLN Nomor 5599, Ps. 31.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Jaminan Fidusia, UU No. 42 Tahun 1999, LN Nomor 168, Tahun 1999, TLN Nomor 3889, Ps. 1 angka 1.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Tentang Jaminan Fidusia, UU No. 42 Tahun 1999, LN Nomor 168, Tahun 1999, TLN Nomor 3889, Ps. 1 angka 2.
Kementrian Hukum dan HAM RI. (2022, September 6). Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
Kompasiana. (2016, December 9). Media Sosial YouTube.
KUHPerdata, Ps. 499.
Ok.Saidin. (2013). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (intelellectual Property Right), . Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Ekonomi Kreatif, PP No. 24 Tahun 2022, LN Nomor 151, Tahun 2022, TLN Nomor 6802, Ps. 1 angka 6. (n.d.).
Rachmadi Usman. (2008a). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rachmadi Usman. (2008b). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Garafika.
Shopar Maru Hutagalung. (1994). Hak Cipta Kedudukan dan Peranannya di Dalam Pembangunan. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Soerjono Soekanto, & Sri Mahmudji. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
