Validity and Legal Consequences of Granting Building Use Rights to the Komanditer/Comanditaire Venootshap Guild (CV)
Keywords:
Building rights, Limited partnership, Circular letterAbstract
The granting of Building Use Rights (hereinafter referred to as HGB) cannot be given to limited partnerships. This is because the Limited Partnership is a business entity, while what can be granted HGB is a legal entity. HGB is the right to construct or own a building on land that is not one's own for a limited period of time. In Indonesia, this HGB is regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (hereinafter referred to as UUPA) and those who can own this HGB are Indonesian Citizens (WNI) and legal entities established and domiciled in Indonesia as described in Article 36 paragraph (1 ) UUPA. In practice, there is a policy that allows these Limited Partnerships to own HGB as contained in Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 issued by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning regarding the Granting of HGB to Limited Partnerships. This Circular Letter aims to increase investment and encourage economic growth in all regions of Indonesia by granting HGB to Limited Partnerships. This research focuses on discussing the suitability and legal consequences of granting HGB to limited partnerships based on Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and an analytical approach. This research will explain the granting of HGB based on the UUPA and government regulations, the status of limited partnerships in Indonesia, and the legal consequences of enforcing Circular Letter Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 on obtaining HGB for limited partnerships.
Downloads
References
C.S.T. Kansil. (1985). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.
Harsono Boedi. (1995). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djembatan.
Hasanah, S. (n.d.). Perbuatan Hukum dan Akibat Hukum. Retrieved from Hukum Online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5ceb4f8ac3137/arti-perbuatan-hukum--bukan-perbuatan-hukum-dan-akibat-hukum/
Kartini Mulyadi. (2004). Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak-hak Atas Tanah. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Maria S. W. Sumarjono. (2001). Kebijakan Pertanahan antara Regulasi dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Buku Kompas.
Naskah Akademik RUU Badan Usaha. (n.d.). Retrieved from Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia website: https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/badan_usaha.pdf
Paraningrum, D. H. (2014). Telaah Terhadap Esensi Subjek Hukum: Manusia Dan Badan Hukum. Refleksi Hukum, 8(1), 89.
Rachmadhani, R. (2013). Faktor Penyebab Persero Pasif Melakukan Tindakan Aktif dan Akibat Hukumnya. Malang.
Raharjo, H. (2009). Hukum Perusahaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Saptini, E. (2015). Kewenangan Para Sekutu Persekutuan Komanditer Dalam Memfidusiakan Peralatan Operasional Perusahaan. Jurnal Repertorium, 2(2).
Sembiring, S. (2012). Hukum Perusahaan. Bandung: CV Nuansa Aulia.
Sembiring, S. (2015). Hukum Dagang. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soerjono, S. (1989). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Sonia Carolline Batubara; et. al. (2019). Persekutuan Komanditer (Commanditaire Venootschap) Sebagai Pemegang Hak Guna Bangunan. Jurnal Notaire, 2(3).
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
