Analysis Of Weakness In Enforcement Of Law Number 6 Of 2011 Concerning Immigration From Routine Activity Theory
Keywords:
Immigration, Routine activity theory, Law enforcementAbstract
Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration regulates immigration law enforcement, both immigration administratif acts and immigration crimes. The implementation of immigration law enforcement is carried out by immigration officials who carry out their duties based on the applicable laws and regulations. However, the implementation of the implementation of Law Number 6 of 2011 cannot be said to be effective and in accordance with the reality. Today, the gap between das sollen and das sein in the application and enforcement of Law Number 6 of 2011, is so obvious that it is considered a routine activity. So, the formulation of the problem that will be examined in this paper is related to why there can be an application of the theory of routine activities in Law number 6 of 2011 and what is the effect of the theory of routine activities in immigration law enforcement in Law number 6 of 2011. This writing uses a qualitative research method with a qualitative approach. qualitative descriptive and data collection techniques carried out in a combined manner, namely inductive/qualitative. From the results of the study, it is known that the theory of routine activities in law enforcement as stipulated in Law No. 6 of 2011 resulted in many foreigners not complying with immigration rules properly due to the lack of strict enforcement of the applicable law.
Downloads
References
Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. CV Jejak (Jejak Publisher).
Atmadja, I. D. G. (2018). Asas-asas hukum dalam sistem hukum. Kertha Wicaksana, 12(2), 145-155.
Friedman, L. M. (2019). Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Nusamedia.
Hartono, H. (2012). Penyidikan dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Miller, J. M. (2014). The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology. John Wiley & Sons.
Nainggolan, P. P. (2018). Aktor non-negara: kajian implikasi kejahatan transnasional di Asia Tenggara. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Nugraha, R. (2021). Perspektif Hukum Indonesia (Cyberlaw) Penanganan Kasus Cyber Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(2).
Priyono, A. P., & Intarti, A. (2019). Penegakkan Hukum Sanksi Pidana Perpajakan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpapajakan Dikaitkan dengan Asas Ultimum Remedium. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(1), 1-14.
Regar, S. P. (2021). Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi Terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 10(4).
Rompas, K., Liando, D. M., & Waworundeng, W. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Pengawasan Orang Asing Di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Pembangunan, 1(1), 1-9.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian
Widayati, L. S. (2015). Ultimum Remedium dalam Bidang Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 22(1), 1-24.
Zenno, M. P. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3), 257-276.
