Mediation Empowerment in Resolution of Civil Claims in State Court

Authors

  • Hariadi Hariadi Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i1.750

Keywords:

District Court, Empowerment, Mediation

Abstract

Mediation is a way of resolving disputes through a negotiation process to obtain an agreement between the parties assisted by a mediator as a facilitator, the provisions of which are regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in District Courts. Mediation in court is the institutionalization and empowerment of peace (court-connected mediation) with the philosophical basis of Pancasila which is the basis of the Indonesian State, especially the fourth precept "Populist led by Wisdom of Wisdom in Deliberation/Representation". The fourth precept of the Pancasila, among other things, requires that efforts to resolve disputes, conflicts or cases be carried out through deliberations to reach a consensus that is filled with a spirit of kinship. Mediation in court is the result of the development and empowerment of peace institutions as stipulated in the provisions of Article 130 Herziene Inlandsch Reglemen (HIR) / 154 Rechtsreglemen voor de Buitengewesten (RBg) which requires a judge who hears a case to earnestly seek peace between the litigants. Efforts to resolve through Mediation apart from benefiting the parties are also beneficial for the Court because Mediation is expected to overcome the problem of accumulation of cases. however, the results of research at the Sengkang District Court Class IB and the Maros District Court Class IB show that the implementation of mediation is in accordance with Perma No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures at the District Court. However, there are several obstacles encountered in resolving civil lawsuit disputes in the District Court, namely egotism, external factors, educational factors, absence of the parties, passing the time limit, aspects of advocates and aspects of mediator judges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hariadi Hariadi, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

 

 

References

Abbas, S. (2009). Mediation in the Perspective of Sharia Law, Customary Law, National Law. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group.

ABNP. (2023, Januari 2). Harapan Optimalisasi Hasil Mediation Pasca Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016. Diambil kembali dari https:/www.abnp.co.id: https:/www.abnp.co.id/news/harapan-optimalisasi-hasil-mediation-pasca-perma-nomor-1-tahun-2016, accessed on January 2, 2023

Amriani, N. (2011). Alternative Mediation for Settlement of Civil Disputes in Court. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Fuady, M. (2000). National Arbitration, Alternative Business Dispute Resolution. Bandung: Image Aditya Bakti.

Gifis, S. H. (2017). Quoted by Abdurrahman Konoras: Legal Aspects of Mediation Dispute Resolution in Court. Depok: Rajawali Press.

Hanifah, M. (2016). “Mediation as an Alternative to Civil Dispute Resolution in Court. MJournal of Law, Vol. 2 No. 1.., 2.

Harahap, M. Y. (2010). Civil Procedure Law: Concerning Lawsuits, Trials, Confiscations, Evidence and Court Decisions, Cet. 10. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic.

Heryani, A. A. (2012). Exploring Empirical Studies of Law. Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group.

Irwansyah. (2021). Legal Research: Choices of Article Writing Methods and Practices. Yogyakarta: Mitra Buana Media.

Law Number 30 of 1999 Concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Mertokusumo, S. (1979). Indonesian Civil Procedure Code. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Perma No. 1 of 2016 Concerning Mediation Procedures in Court

Puspitaningrum, S. (2018). Mediation as an effort to resolve civil disputes in court. Journal of the Legal Spectrum Vol 15/No.2., 2.

Ropaun, R. (2006). Complete Civil Procedure Code. Jakarta: Sinar Graphic.

Rustandi, A. (2017, 10 03). Penelitian Hukum Empiris dan Normatif. Diambil kembali dari https://andirustandi.com: https://andirustandi.com/baca/386/Metode-Penelitian-Hukum-Empiris-dan-Normatif.html

Sarwono. (2012). Civil Procedure Law: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.

Sitepu, R. (2006). Empowerment of Mediation as an Alternative to Indonesian Dispute Resolution, delivered in the inauguration speech of the permanent professor in the field of customary law at the Faculty of Law. Sumatera Utara: University of North Sumatra.

Sitourus, W. (1998). Legal Aspects of International Business Dispute Resolution through Mediation as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: Thesis at Postgraduate Program, University of Indonesia,.

Soesilo, R. (1985). RIB/HIR with explanation,. Bogor: Politeia.

Subekti, & Tjitrosudibio. (1985). Code of Civil law. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Suharto. (2005). Briefing in the Framework of Mediator Training in Welcoming the Application of Perma Court Annexed Mediation in Courts in Indonesia. Jakarta: Papers in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Mediation and Peace, Pusdiklat MA RI.

Tesis, I. (2005, Maret 10). Hukum Empirical dan Normative. Diambil kembali dari https://idtesis.com: https://idtesis.com/methode-penelitian- Hukum-empirical-dan normative/

Usman, R. (2012). Mediation in court in theory and practice. Jakarta: Graphics Light.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

Hariadi, H. (2023). Mediation Empowerment in Resolution of Civil Claims in State Court. LEGAL BRIEF, 12(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i1.750

Issue

Section

National and International Criminal Law