Accountability of Bankruptcy Bank Debts (Harapan Sentosa Bank Case Towards Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance)

Authors

  • Fikri Rafi Musyaffa Abidin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Chiquita Thefirstly Noerman Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Syalaisha Amani Puspitasari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i4.870

Keywords:

Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance, Bankrupt, Commercial Banks, Liquidation

Abstract

Commercial banks are legal subjects because they are one type of companies or corporations. One of the causes of the liquidation of a commercial bank is bankruptcy. One of the banks in liquidation was the case of Harapan Sentosa Bank. Harapan Sentosa Bank is a bank that has received Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance worth 3.87 trillion. Currently, Harapan Sentosa Bank has gone bankrupt but still has debts to Bank Indonesia. Therefore, this research will discuss the legal consequences if the debtor's debts are more than the assets after being declared bankrupt and the responsibility of the Harapan Sentosa Bank for Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance debts. This research uses a normative juridical research type using a literature study. The author uses a normative juridical type of research, and the research uses a case approach. The analysis technique used in forming the author's journal is a qualitative technique. The results of this research are that the best suggestion is to take this case to the penal code to force all parties involved in this case to be subject to the maximum punishment. Prosecution as a criminal act of corruption, in this case, is also related to technical problems in the process of investigation, prosecution, and verification, which are considered precise by using the Corruption Crime Law compared to the Banking Law for which there are currently no provisions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiyah, M. S. (2021). REFORMASI EKONOMI HABIBIE 1998-1999: SEBUAH KEBIJAKAN ATASI KRISIS EKONOMI ORDE BARU. Sejarah Dan Budaya?: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, Dan Pengajarannya, 15(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v15i22021p249-262

Bayu Kencana, M. R. (2021, Agustus). Sejarah Panjang BLBI yang Rugikan Negara hingga Ratusan Triliun Rupiah. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4642590/sejarah-panjang-blbi-yang-rugikan-negara-hingga-ratusan-triliun-rupiah?page=3

Budy, V. (n.d.). Daftar 18 Eks Bank Dalam Likuidasi yang Belum Lunasi Utang BLBI. Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved September 20, 2023, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/09/28/daftar-18-eks-bank-dalam-likuidasi-yang-belum-lunasi-utang-blb

Djajakustio, P. (2023). Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (SKMHT) Batal Demi Hukum: Urgensi dan alternatif membangun konsep baru perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i1.38539

Faisal, M. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi di Suatu Perseroan Terbatas Ketika Terjadi Kepailitan Pada Umumnya Dan Menurut Doktrin Hukum Perusahaan & Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, 17(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v17i2.350

Fauzan, F. (2022). The Application of the Insolvency Principle as a Condition for a Debt Rexturization for a Bankrupt Company. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(3), 123.

Fiazmi, A., & Sumandoyo, A. (2019). Jejak Maling Keluarga Tansil. Tirto.id. , https://tirto.id/jejak-maling-keluarga-tansil-efuf

Hanafi, A. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggung Jawaban Direksi dalam Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Atas Dasar Kelalaian dalam Pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Khazanah Hukum, 3(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i3.14788

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Hukum perseroan terbatas (Cet. 1). Sinar Grafika.

Hawari, A., & Daniel, D. (2020). Akibat Kepailitan pada Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan yang Berorientasi Pemulihan oleh Pemerintah dan/atau Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 7(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v7i1.225

Janisriwati, S. (2011). Kepailitan Bank; Aspek Hukum Kewenangan Bank Indonesia dalam Kepailitan Suatu Bank (LoGoz Publishing).

moeljatno, moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidan (Cet.8). Rineka Cipta.

Narwoko, D. (n.d.). Kisah Bank Harapan Sentosa Rampok Uang Rakyat. Merdeka.Com. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/kisah-bank-bhs-rampok-uang-rakyat.html

Nindyo & Associates, Attorney at Law and Capital Market Consultant, & Wardhana, G. (2019). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HARTA PRIBADI PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI INDONESIA. Arena Hukum, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01201.1

Novanolo Gulo, N., Elisabeth Kalalo, M., & H. Tampungangoy, G. (2023). KEDUDUKAN HUKUM BANK INDONESIA DAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN DALAM MENGAJUKAN PERMOHONAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT TERHADAP LEMBAGA PERBANKAN. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 8(5). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/50256/43601

Pangkerego, O. A., & Tampi, B. (n.d.). TANGGUNG JAWAB AHLI WARIS TERHADAP HARTA WARISAN PEWARIS MENURUT KITAB UNDANG – UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA1 Oleh: Yayu Palayukan2. 4.

Proyek Pengembangan Hukum Ekonomi dan Penyempurnaan Sistem Pengadaan (Indonesia) (Ed.). (1997). Kamus hukum ekonomi ELIPS (Ed. 1). ELIPS.

Silaban J, Syahrani D, Indriani S, & Hasyim. (2023). Analisis Penyebab Bank Runs (Studi Kasus Svb Silicon Valley Bank). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8160819

Soerjono Soekanto. (2006). Penelitian hukum normatif.

Supaijo. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Kejahatan Perbankan. Jurnal hukum ekonomi syariah, 2(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v2i1.1623

Taufani, G., & Suteki. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik). Rajawali Pers.

Triaulina, L., & Pratikto, M. I. S. (2023). Implementasi Tingkat Kesehatan Kinerja Keuangan Dan Potensi Financial Distress Melalui Pendekatan RGEC Dan ZMIJEWSKI Pada Bank Muamalat Indonesia Periode 2017-2021. Al-Muraqabah: Journal of Management and Sharia Business, 3(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.30762/almuraqabah.v3i1.322

Trisna Dewi, P. E. (2023). KARAKTERISTIK KHUSUS PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA KEPAILITAN. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 2(2), 324.

Yuhelson, Y. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Ideas Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Abidin, F. R. M. ., Noerman, C. T. ., Puspitasari, S. A., & Tarina, D. D. Y. . (2023). Accountability of Bankruptcy Bank Debts (Harapan Sentosa Bank Case Towards Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance). LEGAL BRIEF, 12(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v12i4.870

Issue

Section

Legal and related sciences