Questioning the Protection of President’s Dignity in the New Criminal Code

Authors

  • Adi Gunawan Madura University, Indonesia
  • Suhaimi Suhaimi Madura University, Indonesia
  • Adriana Pakendek Madura University, Indonesia
  • Gatot Subroto Madura University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i2.987

Keywords:

Constitutional, Dignity, President

Abstract

Protecting the president’s dignity in law is not a new thing that has received much controversy from the public, even in the realm of the international state. Even in Indonesia, this article was annulled by the Constitutional Court. Nevertheless, the new Criminal Code has been reinforced, resulting in many pros and cons from the public. Therefore, this research discussed why the article on protecting the president’s dignity was reinserted in the New Criminal Code. This research was normative legal research, while the data source consisted of secondary data, with primary and secondary legal materials such as books, scientific journals, papers, and scientific articles. The data collection process was done through library research using qualitative data analysis. This research used a conceptual approach and studies related to statutory regulations. The research found that protecting the president’s dignity is essential for ordinary people in general. However, in the constitutional realm, a president is an interpretation of the State representing all citizens. Therefore, it is highly justified if this article is reactivated. Apart from that, if this article is not included in the new Criminal Code, it can potentially cause subsociality in public

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi G., Heryanti, F., Hukum, F., & Madura, U. (2024). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling. 4(7), 382–391.

Annas, A., Pancaningrum, R. K., Hukum, F., Mataram, U., Barat, N. T., Pidana, T., Presiden, T., Presiden, M., Pembangunan, R., Menengah, J., Pembangunan, R., Menengah, J., Pembangunan, R., & Menengah, J. (2021). Konstitusionalisme Delik Penghinaan Presiden Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 013-022 / Puu-Iv / 2006. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(1), 483.

Bangsawan, A. S. (2019). Kajian Kritis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 013-022/Puu-Iv/2006 Tentang Pembatalan Pasal Penghinaan Terhadap Presiden. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p97-114

Cabrejas-Artola, C. (2022). The Presidential Speeches and the US-Iran Nuclear Deal: Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy Percepts on Freedom, Dignity and Independence. Journal of Strategic Studies & International Affairs, 2(1), 76–105. https://doi.org/10.17576/sinergi.0201.2022.05

Cahyani, H., Firdaus, I. N., Sitanggang, J. E., & Irawan, F. (2022). Kebijakan Pasal-Pasal Kontroversial Dalam RUU KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Dinamika Sosial Kultur Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science, 2(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v2i2.175

Daud, B. S., & Awaluddin, A. (2021). Aspek Religius dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana melalui Politik Hukum Nasional. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4334

Eko Listiyani et.al. (2020). Filsafat Hukum Pancasila: (Kajian Hukum, Politik, Dan Hak Asasi Manusia). Megalitera.

Ellandra, A. Z., Faqih, M., & Azizi, K. (2022). Status Quo Pengaturan Pasal Penghinaan Presiden Sebagai Pembatas Hak Konstitusional Terkait Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia Beserta Potensi Pengaturannya Di Masa Depan: Studi Kasus Penghinaan Presiden Di Media Sosial (Kasus Ruslan Buton). Jurnal Studia Legalia, 3(01), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61084/jsl.v3i01.20

Fauzani, M. A., Rohman, F. N., & H., D. F. (2021). Pemberlakuan Peraturan Dasar Sebagai Wadah Haluan Negara (Gagasan Redesain Garis-Garis Besar Haluan Negara (GBHN) Prespektif Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia). Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v2i1.10408

Fernando, Z. J., Pujiyono, & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Telaah Pasal Penghinaan Terhadap Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding?: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(1), 135–151. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/826/292

Gunawan, A., Nadir, N., & Fatkhurohman, F. (2022). Building The Strengthening of Environmental Protection and Management In The Industrial Revolution-Era 4.0. Sasi, 28(4), 619. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i4.1145

Irmawanti, N. D., & Arief, B. N. (2021). Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227

Ismayawati, A. (2021). Pendekatan dan Politik Hukum dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. YUDISIA?: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i1.11011

Jurakulovich, S. J. (2023). A STEP TOWARDS HUMAN DIGNITY. GOLDEN BRAIN, 1(4), 60. 2181-4120

Kusnadi, Y. (2022). FORMULASI PASAL PENYERANGAN HARKAT DAN MARTABAT PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA. Wacava Paramarta, 21(3), 100.

Maghfiroh, S. A., & Pratiwi, P. H. (2020). Strategi Panti Sosial Marsudi Putra (PSMP) Antasena Magelang dalam Pelayan dan Rehabilitasi Anak Berhadapan Hukum (ABH). DIMENSIA: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, 8(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.21831/dimensia.v8i1.35569

Mustopadidjaja Ar, D. (2012). BAPPENAS: Dalam Sejarah Perencanaan Pembangunan Indonesia 1945 -2025,. LP3ES & Paguyuban Alumni Bappenas).

Nadia Marzouki. (2021). Whatever Happened to Dignity? The Politics of Citizenship in Post-Revolution Tunisia.

Novendawati. (2022). Mengenal Analisa Konten. Forum Ilmiah, 19(1), 78.

Nugroho, N. (2019). Urgensi Pembaruan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Dinamika Masyarakat Indonesia. Spektrum Hukum, 14(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v14i1.1102

Poscher, R. (2009). Human dignity as a right. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 4(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-009-0024-3

Prahassacitta, V. (2023). Human Dignity in the Criminal Process: A Lesson Learned from Torture Case in Germany. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 6(1), 1–14.

Prayogo, W. A. S. (2020). Tinjauan Kebijakan Pidana terhadap Martabat Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam RKUHP. Pandecta, 15(2), 212.

Rafiqi, I. D. (2021). Criticisms toward the Job Creation Bill and Ethical Reconstruction of Legislators Based on Prophetic Values. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 29(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i1.14991

Reza Hariyadi, A. (2021). Dinamika Kebijakan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Indonesia. JDKP Jurnal Desentralisasi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.30656/jdkp.v2i2.3887

Rohmah, E. I. (2023). Pasal Penghinaan Presiden dalam Bingkai Negara Demokrasi. Al-Jinayah, 9(1), 39.

Yusa, I. G., & Hermanto, B. (2017). Gagasan Rancangan Undang-undang Lembaga Kepresidenan: Cerminan Penegasan dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensiil Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i3.119

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Gunawan, A. ., Suhaimi, S., Pakendek, A. ., & Subroto, G. . (2024). Questioning the Protection of President’s Dignity in the New Criminal Code. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i2.987

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June: Law Science and Field

Section

Constitutional Law, Legislation, Government and Constitution

License

Copyright (c) 2024 LEGAL BRIEF

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.