The Implementation of Ultra Petita Principle in Decisions on Corruption Cases in Indonesia (A Study of Legal Sociology)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.625Keywords:
Corruption Crime, Ultra Petita, Legal Purpose TheoryAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the ultra petita principle in criminal procedural law in Indonesia and to analyze the implementation of the ultra petita principle in decisions on corruption cases from the perspective of the theory of legal purposes. This research is a Sociology of Law research with Statue Approach, Conceptual Approach and Legal Sociology Approach. The material obtained is in the form of primary legal material and secondary legal material which is analyzed systematically and qualitatively in this case it will examine all data collected based on primary legal material and secondary legal material, which will then be connected with principles, legal theories, as well as the formulation of existing legislation so that a conclusion can be drawn in order to answer the problem studied. decision in corruption cases, especially related to the Juliari P. Batubara case, is justifiable because basically the judge decides according to the prosecutor's indictment, not the indictment. The judge has the authority to decide on a case based on the prosecutor's demands if it is in accordance with the legal facts at trial but must remain within the minimum maximum limit of the article suspected. In the decision on the criminal act of corruption, Juliari P. Batubara focused more on the aspect of legal certainty in the theory of legal purposes.
Downloads
References
Bastary, M. H. (2014, Maret Senin). Memahami Pasal 189 ayat (3) R Bg dan Pasal 178 ayat (3) HIR. Retrieved Februari Selasa, 2022, from https://www.pta-palembang.net: https://www.pta-palembang.net/v2/index.php/berita/berita-pengadilan/artikel/934-memahami-pasal-189-ayat-3-rbg-dan-pasal-178-ayat-3-hir
dkk, B. S. (2014). Kajian Penerapan Asas Ultra PetitaPada Petitum Ex Aequo Et Bono. Jurnal Yuridika, Vol. 29 No. 2, 104.
Hasanah, S. (2017, Maret Kamis). Arti Asas Ius Curia Novit. Retrieved November Sabtu, 2022, from https://www.hukumonline.com: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-asas-iius-curia-novit-i-lt58dca7c78ab7d
Irwan, M. A. (2020, Mei Kamis). Putusan Ultra Petita dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Retrieved November Rabu, 2022, from https://pji.kejaksaan.go.id: https://pji.kejaksaan.go.id/index.php/home/berita/833
Irwansyah, & Yunus, A. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.
Luis. (2021). Legalitas Ultra Petita dalam Hukum Acara Pidana pada Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol. 4 No. 2, 1638.
Martitah. (2014). Anotasi Putusan Ultra Petita Dalam Lingkup Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal MMH Jilid 3 No. 1, 119.
Putra, Y. S. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Ultra Petita Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Pandang Dari Aspek Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Ubelaj Vol. 1 No. 1, 25.
Sasmito, H. A. (2011). Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang (Suatu Perspektif Hukum Progresif). Jurnal Law Reform Vol. 6 No. 2, 67.
Sofyan, A., & Asis, A. (2014). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sofyan, A., & Azisa, N. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Makassar: Pustaka Pena Press.
Yasin, M. (2017, Mei Jumat). Batasan Ultra Petita dalam Perkara Pidana. Retrieved November Kamis, 2022, from https://www.hukumonline.com: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/batasan-iultra-petita-i-dalam-putusan-perkara-pidana-lt59127a57206a8
