Chain Decisions in Digital Government: Between Validity, Integration, and Legal Consequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v14i6.1537Keywords:
Digital Government, Chain Decisions, Legal Validity, System Integration, Legal Certainty, SPBEAbstract
The development of digital government in Indonesia presents a new paradigm in administrative decision-making through integrated electronic systems. Decisions in digital government often have a cascading nature, where initial decisions form the basis for subsequent decisions. This study analyzes the validity of cascading decisions and the legal consequences of digital system integration, focusing on how flaws at one stage can affect the validity of subsequent decisions, and how system synchronization determines the legal consequences of data or procedural inconsistencies. The research methods used are literature review and normative analysis of national regulations, including Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic Systems and Transactions (SPBE) and Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. The results show that the validity of cascading decisions is highly dependent on compliance with legal procedures, data integrity, and the application of administrative law principles. Meanwhile, good digital system integration can ensure consistency, legal certainty, and accountability, while integration failures have the potential to create legal uncertainty and administrative disputes. This study emphasizes that digital government is not merely a technological transformation, but also a legal transformation that requires strict system and procedural management.
Downloads
References
Bernardo, B. M. V., São Mamede, H., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024). Data governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100598.
Bin Shaharuddin, M. H. (2023). Hukum Penetapan Mahar Oleh Sultan Selangor di Tinjau dari Hukum Islam. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 7693–7702.
Fan, J., Wang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2024). The impact of blockchain on the administrative efficiency of provincial governments based on the data envelopment analysis–Tobit model. Sustainability, 16(7), 2909.
Galluci, A. (2025). The Dynamics of State Administrative Law and the Role of Government in Upholding Social Justice: A Case Study of Public Policy Management in the Era of Digital Technology. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3).
Habibani, R. A., & Frinaldi, A. (2024). Roberia. Penerapan Prinsip Legalitas dalam Kebijakan Administrasi Publik. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(12).
Hairunnisa, H. (2025). Analisis Komparasi Sistem Hukum di Bidang Sertifikasi Elektronik Antara Indonesia dan Singapura. IAIN PAREPARE.
Hartanto, R., & Fauziati, S. (2022). Hambatan-Hambatan Dalam Implemetasi Layanan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (Spbe) Pada Pemerintah Daerah. JIKO (Jurnal Informatika Dan Komputer), 5(3), 215–223.
Hendra, H., & Fahlevi, A. H. (2024). Implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles in PDAM Tirta Ogan, Ogan Ilir District. In Iapa Proceedings Conference (pp. 187–195).
Istianto, B. (2015). Gaya Manajemen Bisnis vs Peran Negara Kuat Dalam Mengurus Negara. Language, 10(198p), 24cm.
Kassen, M. (2025). Blockchain and digital governance: Decentralization of decision making policy. Review of Policy Research, 42(1), 95–121.
Kencono, B. D., Putri, H. H., & Handoko, T. W. (2024). Transformasi Pemerintahan Digital: Tantangan dalam Perkembangan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) di Indonesia. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 1498–1506.
Kozio?-Nadolna, K., & Beyer, K. (2021). Determinants of the decision-making process in organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2375–2384.
Mustamu, J. (2011). Diskresi dan tanggungjawab administrasi pemerintahan. Sasi, 17(2), 1–9.
Natalie, S. D. R., Rafiqi, I. D., Fernanda, Z. D. S., & Janitra, A. K. (2025). KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI OBYEK GUGATAN TATA USAHA NEGARA: KEDUDUKAN DAN SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 4(1), 1–22.
Nurfadillah, A. (2025). Penerapan E-Government pada Sektor Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus Aplikasi OpenSID di Desa Tondowolio Kecamatan Tanggetada Kabupaten Kolaka). PENA Bisnis Dan Governansi Publik Adaptif, 1(1), 72–85.
Pasolong, H. (2023). Teori pengambilan keputusan. Penerbit Alfabeta.
Rachmad, Y. E., Ilham, R., Indrayani, N., Manurung, H. E., Judijanto, L., Laksono, R. D., & Sa’dianoor, S. (2024). Layanan Dan Tata Kelola E-Government: Teori, Konsep Dan Penerapan. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.
Salsabila, T. H., Indrawati, T. M., & Fitrie, R. A. (2024). Meningkatkan efisiensi pengambilan keputusan publik melalui kecerdasan buatan. Journal of Internet and Software Engineering, 1(2), 21.
Sudira, I. W. (2025). Keadilan Digital: Tantangan Hukum Dalam Era Disrupsi Teknologi. Kertha Widya, 12(2), 35–59.
Susilawati, F. E., Yanti, R., & Erni, E. (2023). Transformasi Digital Pemerintah (Studi Kasus: Implementasi e-Government dan Hambatannya). Journal Social Society, 3(2), 80–94.
Syafaat, F., Azhar, R., Aminah, S., & Zakiyabarsih, F. (2025). Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik pada Instansi Daerah: Studi Kasus Disdukcapil Kabupaten Donggala. Jurnal Manajemen Informatika, Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi Komputer (JUMISTIK), 4(1), 384–391.
Syafe’ie, A. D., Putri, A. S. J., Al Akbar, A., Abawaiki, A., Rohmah, A., & Revianto, D. M. (2025). PERAN LOGIKA DAN PENALARAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN OLEH HAKIM. Edukreatif: Jurnal Kreativitas Dalam Pendidikan, 6(1).
Thalia, A., Bintoro, B. J., Esfandiary, G. J., Bahtiar, M. R. A., Qomariyah, S. L., & Siswajanthy, F. (2025). Analisis Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah Akibat Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat di Wilayah Perkotaan: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Dan Implikasi Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Dan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
