Implementation of the Use of Co-Branding of Yogyakarta Specialty Products and Dispute Resolution of Trademark Infringement Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i2.998Keywords:
Co-Branding Jogja, Intellectual Property Rights, Trademark RightsAbstract
Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are one way the government can achieve maximum economic growth. The number of established MSMEs has resulted in the emergence of many new brands, increasing the opportunity for violations. Therefore, public awareness and the role of local government in protecting MSMEs in the region are needed . In addition to adhering to the Trademark Law, the Special Region of Yogyakarta initiated an innovative regulation governing Co-Branding Jogja to protect the essence of intellectual property rights owned by MSMEs, especially trademark rights. This research uses a normative-empirical type of legal research with qualitative data analysis. The results of this study show that there are still obstacles to implementing the use of the Jogja co-branding brand. However, the government seeks to continue evaluating regulations to solve these problems. Regarding alternative dispute resolution, the government cooperates with the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Yogyakarta by facilitating complaints if the Trademark Rights holders find their trademarks used by others without permission
Downloads
References
Adiputra, I. G. M. J., Widiati, I. A. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(2), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.2.2343.67-71
Andriani, M., & Apriani, R. (2022). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humanior, 9(5). https://doi.org/www. dx.doi.org 10.31604/justitia.v9i5. 2401-2407
Anggraeni, S. (2024a, Mei). Implementasi Co-Branding Jogja [Personal communication].
Anggraeni, S. (2024b, Mei). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Merek [Personal communication].
Anggraeni, S. (2024c, Mei). Tahapan Proses Mediasi [Personal communication].
Arifin, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK YANG TERDAFTAR. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2117
Asep, H., Lemanah, S., & Latifah, Z. (2022). Peran UMKM (Usaha, Mikro, Kecil, Menengah) Dalam Pembangunan. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v3i7.2217
Asri, D. P. B. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Industri Kreatif UMKM Melalui Co-Branding. Kepel Press.
BAPPEDA DIY. (2023). Aplikasi Dataku. Bappeda DIY.
Fajri, R. N. (2022). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi melalui Pengembangan Sistem Keuangan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) Makanan dan Minuman di Yogyakarta. Owner, 6(2), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.723
Hidayah, K. (2020). Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Sinar Press.
Jogja KI. (n.d.). Data Co-Branding. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://jogjaki.jogjaprov.go.id/mod.php?module=byname_co&tahun=2020&jenis_co=3&jenis_usaha=&kabupaten=&kecamatan=&desa=
JogjaKi. (n.d.). Data Co-Branding. Balai KI Jogja. Retrieved June 5, 2024, from https://jogjaki.jogjaprov.go.id/byname_cobranding.asp
Lasut, P. W. (n.d.). Penyelesaian Sengketa Gugatan Atas Pelanggaran Merek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Et Societatis, 7(1), 2019.
Linanjung, M. A. P. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Co-Branding Jogjamarak, 100% Jogja, dan Jogja Tradition Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Pengembangan UMKM. Jurnal of Politic and Goverment Studies,. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/28837
Lukman, M., & Happy, Y. A. (2023). Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosia, 10(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i6.2023.2971-2981
Mahmud, M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Muhammad, S. (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Kajian Penelitian Normatif, Empiris, Penulisan Proposal, Laporan Skripsi dan Tesis. Dotplus Publisher.
Murjiyanto, R., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Penggunaan Co Branding Produk Daerah. http://www.e-journal.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/PSN/article/view/1549/1024
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Kencana.
Praja, C. B. E., Riswandi, B. A., & Dimyati, K. (2021). Urgensi Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta. Kertha Patrika, 43(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2021.v43.i03.p04
Pramesti, T. J. A. (n.d.). Perbedaan Peradilan dan Pengadilan. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-peradilan-dengan-pengadilan-lt548d38322cdf2/
Sari, I. (2014). Keunggulan Arbitrase sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.354
Suhargon, R. (2019). ANALISA HUKUM TERHADAP PENTINGNYA PENDAFTARAN HAK MEREK DAGANG BAGI UMKM DALAM RANGKA MENINGKATKAN PEREKONOMIAN RAKYAT (Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2016 tentang Hak Merek dan Indikasi Geografis). JURNAL MUQODDIMAH?: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hummaniora, 3(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v3i2.2019.67-73
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
