Constitutional Court of Indonesia Decision Number 90 After the MKMK Decision and Its Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i4.1092Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision No. 90, MKMK Decision, Constitutional ComplianceAbstract
This research employs a normative juridical approach with a focus on legislative analysis. It evaluates how formal defects and ethical violations by judges impact legitimacy and public perception. The main findings indicate that these two decisions cast doubt on constitutional compliance and legal validity, highlighting the need for stronger review mechanisms and oversight to uphold the integrity of the Constitutional Court (MK). The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of formal defects and ethical violations by judges in Constitutional Court Decision No. 90 and Constitutional Court Honorary Council (MKMK) Decision No. 2/MKMK/L/11/2023 on constitutional legal principles in Indonesia. The conclusion shows that legal validity, constitutional compliance, finality, and the binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions, along with the integrity and reputation of the Constitutional Court, play significant roles in Indonesia’s constitutional law. It was found that Constitutional Court Decision No. 90 and MKMK Decision No. 2 of 2023, related to formal defects and ethical violations, have a significant impact on the legitimacy and public perception of the constitutional justice system. Although the finality and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions are fundamental to legal certainty, a review mechanism is needed in certain situations, especially when formal defects or ethical violations occur. Formal defects and ethical violations can erode public trust and pose serious challenges to the dignity of the constitutional judiciary.
Downloads
References
Amnan, D. (2023). Legalitas Pemecatan Hakim Aswanto Di Tengah Masa Jabatan Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat. Jatiswara, 38(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v38i1.461
Argawati, U. (2022, December). Fungsi MK sebagai Penjaga Gawang Konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Diakses 24 Agustus 2024.
Aziz, A. (2023). Robohnya Mahkamah Konstitusi Kami. IAIN Surakarta, November, 1–4.
BN, A. M. T., Arief, A., Sabir, M. S., & R, N. A. (2023). Menyoal Etika Profesi Hakim dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Syarat Usia Calon Presiden (Capres) dan Calon Wakil Presiden (Cawapres) Perspektif Risalatul Qada ‘Umar. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(11), 626–638.
Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339–1346.
Butt, S. (2021). What Makes a Good Judge Perspectives from Indonesia Asian Journal of Law and Society (P. Baxi, A. W. Bedner, L. Chua, D. Engel, T. Ginsburg, W. Ji, & Yuka Kaneko (eds.)). n behalf of Asian Journal of Law and Society.
Crime, U. N. O. on D. and. (2018). The Bangalore of Judicial Principles Conduct. Https://Www.Unodc.Org/, 112, 1–24.
de Albuquerque, P. P., & Wojtyczek, K. (2019). Judicial Power in a Globalized World: Liber Amicorum Vincent De Gaetano. In Judicial Power in a Globalized World: Liber Amicorum Vincent De Gaetano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20744-1
Feng, W. (2021). Discussion of the Relationship between Fairness and Efficiency ——Based on Rawls’ “A Theory of Justice.” Review of Educational Theory, 4(4), 114. https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i4.3868
Idris, M. F. (2021). Access to Justice for Disability in the Perspective of John Rawls Theory (Case of Demak Regecy Indonesia). Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46486
Kholish, M. A., & Fitra Ulumuddin, I. (2022). Supremasi Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial: Sebuah Tinjauan Hukum Barat Dan Hukum Islam. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i1.20
Lismanida, & Zainal Arifin. (2023). Understanding the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 90/Puu-Xxi/2023 in the Perspective of Civil Law and Common Law Perspectives. International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJAMESC), 1(6), 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.61990/ijamesc.v1i6.129
M. Nggilu, N. (2019). Menggagas Sanksi atas Tindakan Constitution Disobedience terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1613
Muhdar, M., & Susilowati, T. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Penetapan Pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Terhadap Penegakan dan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 1(4), 148–167.
Narwoko, Phahlevy, R. R., & Fatah, A. (2021). Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court’s Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law. Academia Open, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi normatif dan empiris dalam perspektif ilmu hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20.
Pujianti, S. (2023, November). MKMK Berhentikan Anwar Usman dari Jabatan Ketua Mahkamah Konstitusi. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Diakses 24 Agustus 2024.
Raga Nata, A., & Ramadhani Baskoro, M. R. (2023). Analisis Dampak Putusan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 2(02), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v2i02.288
Sakti Koeswanto, E., Riswandi, R., & Redi, A. (2023). Implications of Public Trust Due to Weak Law Enforcement Morality. Edunity?: Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i05.39
Satoto, E., & Hoesein, Z. A. (2024). Understanding The Ruling Of The Constitutional Court No: 90/PUU-XXI/2023 From A Civil Law And Common Law Perspective. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosial Politik, 2(1), 153–165.
Suparto. (2019). Review of the Final and Binding Constitutional Court Decisions of the Republic of Indonesia. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019), 358(Icglow), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.92
Suzeeta, N. S., & Lewoleba, K. K. (2023). Pelanggaran Kode Etik oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(11), 256.
Tobu, E., Mabilani, G. M., & Witarti Rabawati, D. (2024). Penegakan Kode Etika Profesi Hakim Konstitusi. HUMANITIS: Jurnal Humaniora, Sosial Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 78–87.
Wicaksono, D. A., & Rahman, F. (2022). Influencing or Intervention? Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on the Supreme Court in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev823
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
