Analysis of the Partiality in Legal Counseling by Notaries During Extraor-dinary General Meetings of Shareholders Based on the Principle of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i4.1107Keywords:
Legal Counseling, Notary Independence, Principle of JusticeAbstract
One of the notary's authorities is to provide legal counseling, including in the context of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS). This counseling is very important to ensure the legality of the legal process, especially in the preparation of deeds related to the transfer of shares and other important decisions. However, in practice, there are cases where notaries do not perform their duties independently, which ultimately leads to legal problems. As a country of law, Indonesia guarantees legal certainty and protection for every citizen. However, irregularities by less independent notaries, such as in the case of Notary Hartono in Gianyar Regency, highlight significant risks for the parties involved, including potential losses due to falsification of documents. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of deeds produced by non-independent notaries. This study seeks to explore how non-compliance by notaries with this principle affects the validity of the deeds they produce. The method used in this study is a normative juridical approach that utilizes secondary data, with analysis carried out on relevant laws and regulations, documents, and literature related to the authority of notaries and the principle of justice. This research is descriptive-analytical, providing an overview of the consequences arising from the lack of independence in the duties of notaries, followed by analysis. The results of the study show that the lack of independence of notaries in providing legal counseling can cause legally defective deeds and potentially void them, resulting in losses for the affected parties. The case of Notary Hartono serves as a concrete example where violations of notary independence lead to forgery of deeds and significant legal repercussions. The principle of justice is not upheld if the notary does not act independently in carrying out his duties
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Perihal undang-undang (Cet.5). Rajawali Pers.
Benuf, K., Mahmudah, S., & Priyono, E. A. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(2), 20–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Chyntia Djabu, C., & Latumenten, P. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Atas Tindakan Penipuan dan Keberpihakan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Kertha Semaya?: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 761. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2022.v10.i04.p04
Erlita Chita, L., & Fajri Mekka Putra, M. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Untuk Memberikan Penyuluhan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Relaas. Gorontalo Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v6i1.2671
Fahrawi, A. M., Susyanti Nur, S., Mirzana, H. A., & Kunci, K. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Yang Berstatus Sebagai Tersangka Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik Artikel info Artikel history. PETITUM, 10(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v10i2.1275
HS., S., Djumardin, & Munandar, A. (2020). Analisis Terhadap Substansi Kode Etik Notaris: Studi Komparatif Antara Kode Etik Ikatan Notaris Indonesia dengan Georgia, Amerika Serikat dan Québec, Kanada. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 1(2).
Kristiyanto, E. N. (2018). Jangkauan Hukum Nasional Terhadap Prostitusi Daring. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 2.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan PN GIANYAR 149/Pid.B/2019/PN Gin.
Novita Supono, E., Yusuf, C., & Santosa, I. (2024). Peran Notaris Terhadap Pengesahan Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa Perseroan Terbatas yang Menyebabkan Pelaporan Terhadap Notaris. COMSERVA?: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(3), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v4i3.1381
Nugroho, F. A. (2020). Keberpihakan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Kuasa Menjual yang Kurang Pihak (Studi Kasus Putusan MPPN Tanggal 23 Juli 2019 Nomor 07/B/MPPN/VII/2019) [Tesis]. Universitas Indonesia.
Putra, F., & Anand, G. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Yang Dirugikan Atas Penyuluhan Hukum Oleh Notaris. Humani (Hukum Masyarakat Madani), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v8i2.1376
Putri Anjulika, A. (2023). Kewajiban Notaris dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum tanpa Honorarium Kepada Orang yang tidak Mampu. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 2(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i1.1920
Rahmatullah, I. (2020). Meneguhkan Kembali Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum Pancasila. ’ADALAH, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i2.16108
Rosdiana, A. C. (2021). Peran Notaris Dan Keabsahan Akta Rups Yang Dilaksanakan Secara Elektronik (Dilihat Dari Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 16/POJK.04/2020 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Indonesian Notary, 3(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary
Satya Wibowo, W., Najwan, J., & Abu Bakar, F. (2022). Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Recital Review, 4(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Cetakan Ketiga). UI Pres.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Cet.3). Universitas Indonesia.
Syafrudin, A. (2000). Menuju Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara yang Bersih dan Bertanggung Jawab. Jurnal Pro Justisia, IV, 24–27.
Thahira, A. (2020). PENEGAKAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DITINJAU DARI KONSEP NEGARA HUKUM *. https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v5i2.229
Ulum, M. (2022). Fikih Kenotariatan: Studi Tentang Etika Profesi Notaris. Al-Iman Jurnal Keislaman Dan Kemasyarakatan, 6(1).
Wahono, S. (2022). PROSEDUR PEMBUATAN RELAAS AKTA BERITA ACARA RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM (RUPS) PERSEROAN TERBATAS DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA TELEKONFERENSI. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1).
Yesi, F. (2023). Peran Notaris dalam Memberikan Penyuluhan Hukum untuk Memenuhi Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Akta Para Pihak Fitra Yesi. Officium Notarium, 3(1), 86–97.
Yustica, A., Ngadino, N., & Maharani Sukma, N. (2020). Peran Etika Profesi Notaris Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum. NOTARIUS, 13(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29162
Zulfikar, R., & Basri, H. (2024). Analisis Pemalsuan Akta Jual Beli Saham Oleh Notaris. Wacana Paramarta, 23(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v23i2.574
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
