Analysis of Customary Forest Legal Arrangements Post Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i6.1141Keywords:
Customary Forest, Customary Law Communities (MHA), Constitutional Court's Decision No. 35 of 2012Abstract
The objective of this article is to examine the legal framework governing customary forests in the wake of the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 35 of 2012. Does the legislation contravene any established legal principles? What are the consequences of this decision? The research method employed is normative, with a conceptual and legislative approach. The findings of the study demonstrate that the legal regulations pertaining to customary forests subsequent to Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 of 2012 are not in accordance with the established legal hierarchy structure. This has an impact on the legal certainty of regulations on customary forests. One of the problems caused by the above is that the regulations on Customary Law Communities rights in the three ministerial regulations continue to change and have the potential to deviate from the spirit of Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 of 2012. As a result, the authority and rights of MHA over Customary Forests could be more explicit and are likely to always change when there is a change of minister. The results of this study make two (two) recommendations. First, legal regulations on Customary Forests must be addressed when preparing and discussing the Customary Law Community Bill. Second, there must be an explanation or proper interpretation of MHA rights over Customary Forests as intended in Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 of 2012
Downloads
References
Apricia, N. (2022). Hak Negara Dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Atas Hutan Adat. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(7), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i7.128
Asy, S., Hilipito, M. R., & Ali, M. M. (2013). Model dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang ( Studi Putusan Tahun 2003-2012 ). Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(4).
Gusman, D., & Raspati, L. (2024). Konfigurasi Politik UU Cipta Kerja, Dan Implementasi Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012: Masa Depan Kedaulatan Atas Penguasaan Hutan Adat. Nagari Law Review, 7(3), 592. https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.3.p.592-605.2024
Heru Saputra Lumban Gaol, & Rizky Novian Harton. (2021). Political Will Pemerintahan Terhadap Pengelolaan Hutan Adat Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 7(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i1.468
Jemarut, W., B, K. W., Ichsan, A. C., & Andriani, I. G. A. (2023). Juridical study on social forestry before and after job creation law. Tadulako Law Review, 8(2), 250–258. http://jurnal.fakum.untad.ac.id/index.php/TLR/article/view/947/25
Jemarut, W., Solikatun, S., & Rizal, P. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Widya Yuridika, 5(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i1.2494
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012.
Rahmat, A. (n.d.). Sejarah Pengaturan Hutan Adat di Indonesia.
Safiuddin, S. (2018). Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dan Hak Menguasai Negara Di Taman Nasional Rawa Aopa Watumohai. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16681
Sedubun, V. J. (2020). Urgensi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Penetapan Hutan Adat Di Maluku (Tinjauan Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/Puu-X/2013). Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v5i1.161
Simarmata, R. (2015). Kedudukan Hukum Dan Peluang Pengakuan Surat Keterangan Tanah Adat.
Soerjono Soekanto, S. M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. PT RajaGrafindo.
Sofyan Pulungan, M. (2023). Menelaah Masa Lalu, Menata Masa Depan: Sejarah Hukum Tanah Ulayat dan Model Penanganan Konflik Sosialnya. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 235–267. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.6.1.235-267
Sukirno, S. (2016). Tindak Lanjut Pengakuan Hutan Adat Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.35/Puu-X/2012. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 259. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.259-267
Sukrino. (2016). Tindak Lanjut Pengakuan Hutan Adat Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.35/PUU-X/2012. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.259-267
Suparto. (2021). Kedudukan dan Proses Penetapan Hutan Adat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 35/PUU-X/2012 serta Implementasinya di Provinsi Riau. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5(2).
Tobroni, F. (2016). Menguatkan Hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Hutan Adat (Studi Putusan MK Nomor 35/ PUU-X/2012). Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1035
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. (n.d.).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1967 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Kehutanan. (n.d.).
Widowati, D. A., Luthfi, A. N., & Guntur, I. G. N. (2014). Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Di Kawasan Hutan. Yogyakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasiona. Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasiona. STPN PRESS.
Wihelmus Jemarut, B, K. W., & Sari, D. P. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Tentang Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial. WIDYA KERTA: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, 6(2), 123–136. http://e-journal.iahn-gdepudja.ac.id/index.php/WK/article/view/1275
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LEGAL BRIEF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
