Corruption among Public Officials: What is the Oversight and View of Administrative Law?
Keywords:
Corruption, Public Officials, AdministrationAbstract
The spread of corruption among political elites has actually become a planned habit, even now that corruption has begun to decentralize to regional and local level officials, acts of corruption actually occur with awareness, intention, and willingness to commit fraud. The role of administrative law in supervision in the field of public services, especially in the matter of public welfare services, basically functions as a supervisor in order to reduce the number of corrupt practices in Indonesia, especially in the scope of the bureaucracy and public government institutions. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach and data triangulation analysis, the results of the study explain that, bureaucratic reform which is illustrated through fair and equitable public services, is the beginning of awareness of public service mechanisms as well as a milestone in the government's awareness to organize its government system so that it runs smoothly. fair and wise, the spirit of reform that characterizes the utilization of the state apparatus is directed at realizing state administration that is able to support the smooth and integrated implementation of the duties and functions of administering government in a fair and wise manner, the legal aspects of state administration are part of the legal domain that directly influences efforts to realize reform public bureaucracy. This global change is based on universal value standards that can increase the government's participation in providing the best service for the wider community.
Downloads
References
Achmad, W. RW (2021). Conflict Resolution of Remote Indigenous Communities (Overview of The Sociology Communication). LEGAL BRIEF, 10 (2), 280–286.
Arisandi, M. Z. (2021). MEKANISME PENGAWASAN TERHADAP PESERTA BPJS DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA. Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 1(2), 127-139.
Dadi, D. (2021). Oil Palm Plantation Expansion: An Overview of Social and Ecological Impacts in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 6550-6562.
Danil, E. (2021). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Febrianda, L. (2009). Rekonstruksi regulasi pelayanan kependudukan dan pencatatan sipil oleh birokrasi pemerintahan dalam perspektif hukum administrasi negara (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO).
Gultom, B. M., & SH, S. (2017). Pandangan Kritis Seorang Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia 3 (Vol. 3). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 143.
Hadi, K. (2016). Korupsi Birokrasi Pelayanan Publik di Era Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 7(1), 20.
Lewis, C., & Fleming, J. (2017). The everyday politics of value conflict: external independent oversight bodies in Australia. In Government Reformed (pp. 167-184). Routledge.
Makiva, M. (2021). Public Procurement Oversight and the Scourge of Corruption in the Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa and Kenya. Public Procurement, Corruption and the Crisis of Governance in Africa, 223-248.
Manao, D. F. (2018). Penyelesaian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Oleh Aparatur Pemerintah Dari Segi Hukum Administrasi Dihubungkan Dengan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 2(1), 1-23.
Martua, J. (2020). Peran Birokrasi Pemerintah sebagai Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik. Citra Justicia: Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 20(1), 21-30.
Nulhaqim, S. A., & Sulastri, S. (2019). Analisis Faktor Eksternal Dan Faktor Internal Organisasi Pelayanan Sosial Relawan Muda Riau. JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 9(1), 155-170.
Nurtjahjo, H. (2016). Perbedaan Teoritis Antara Lembaga Penyelesaian Kasus Maladministrasi (Ombudsman) Dengan Lembaga Peradilan Administrasi (PTUN). Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik), 2(2), 32-51.
Odilla, F. (2020). Oversee and punish: Understanding the fight against corruption involving government workers in Brazil. Politics and Governance, 8(2), 140-152.
Poluakan, M. V., Dikayuana, D., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2019). Potret Generasi Milenial pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 187-197.
PrawiraW, R., Maulida, H., & Achmad, W. (2021). Narrating the Implementation of Social Welfare Community Program. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), 228-235.
Purwanto, P. (2020). Restrukturisasi Pelayanan Perizinan untuk Menciptakan Pelayanan Publik yang Lebih Baik. JURNAL SPEKTRUM HUKUM, 17(1), 93-106.
Saputra, R. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara Terutama Terkait Dengan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU PTPK). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(2), 269-288.
Sidiq, R. S. S., Jalil, A., & Achmad, R. W. W. (2021). Virtual World Solidarity: How Social Solidarity is Built on the Crowdfunding Platform Kitabisa. com. Webology, 18(1), 192-202.
Sina, L. (2008). Dampak dan upaya pemberantasan serta pengawasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 26(1).
Solechan, S. (2018). Memahami Peran Ombudsman Sebagai Badan Pengawas Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(1), 67-89.
Su’udia, C., Supriyono, B., & Noor, I. (2015). Pengawasan Ombudsman dan Komisi Pelayanan Publik dalam Rangka Mengurangi Maladministrasi (Studi di Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Jawa Timur, Komisi Pelayanan Publik dan Badan Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu Kota Malang). Jurnal Pendidikan PROFESIONAL, 4(2).
Sudirman, L., Hasim, H., & Hafid, A. (2019). IMPLEMENTASI KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM PADA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MAKASSAR. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(2), 179-199.
Sudrajat, T. (2009). Perwujudan Good Governance Melalui Format Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(2), 145-154.
Sugiharto, H., & Abrianto, B. O. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Non Yudisial terhadap Perbuatan Hukum Publik oleh Pemerintah. Yuridika, 33(1), 41-72.
Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Progresivitas Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Progressivity Of Criminal Decision On Corporate Actors Corruption). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 16(2), 201-213.
Triwulan, T., & Sh, M. H. (2016). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Warokka, M. (2017). Peran Ombudsman Dalam Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik Yang Bebas Dari Korupsi, Kolusi Dan Nepotisme. Lex Privatum, 5(1).
Widanarto, A. (2017). Praktek Rent Seeking: Budaya Korupsi Baru Di Kalangan Politisi Dan Birokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Politikom Indonesia, 2(2), 1-13.
Widiatmoko, B. (2007). Analisis Bahasa Politik Pejabat Publik Indonesia Berdasarkan Tinjauan Filsafat Nilai. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, Agama dan Budaya, 8(1), 119-128.
