An An Analysis of Export Restriction Policies for Indonesian Nickel: Strengthening Indonesia's Opportunities from the European Union's Lawsuit Regarding Export Restrictions for Nickel
Keywords:
Trade Disputes, Nickel, Quantitative RestrictionsAbstract
Indonesia's international trade disputes do not just happen once. It has been recorded that Indonesia has entered the WTO's green table several times in the trade dispute settlement. Then, what needs attention is that the Indonesian government was defeated in the trial at the WTO in most of the many disputes facing Indonesia. The main reason for the defeat of the dispute was the weak arguments presented by representatives of the Indonesian government. Indonesia has entered a new lawsuit from the European Union at the WTO regarding the Nickel Export Restriction with Dispute Settlement (DS) Complaint Number 592 on November 22, 2019, on the grounds of violating Article XI: I GATT agreement, related to the prohibition of quantitative restrictions. At the moment, the dispute must be won by Indonesia because it concerns the State's sovereignty regarding natural resources, which are very limited in number and cannot be renewed. This research objective was to provide input in ideas or statements in juridical theories and norms, which were strengthened by doctrines as a refutation of the allegations raised by the European Union in the WTO Session. Furthermore, this research used a normative juridical research method, with secondary data based on writings from some electronic mass media.
Downloads
References
Azis, V.A.A & Abrianti, S. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id. “Analisis terhadap larangan ekspor bijih nikel kadar rendah berdasarkan prinsip restriksi kuantitatif “ S. H., M. H., Vol. 3 No. 2, 2021
Agusman, D.D.“Hukum Perjanjian Internasional, Refika aditama: Bandung, 2010, p. 2
Winarti, Indien. Hukum Internasional, Setara Press: Malang, 2017, pp. 46-71
Izzaty & Suhartono, Kebijakan Percepatan Larangan Ekspor Ore Nikel dan Upaya Hilirisasi Nikel, Jurnal Lemlit Trisakti, Vol. XI, 2019, p. 20
Izzaty & Suhartono, Kajian Singkat terhadap Isu Aktual and Strategis”, Info Singkat, Expertise Board of Indonesian House of Representatives Vol. XI, No.23/I/Research Center, December, 2019
Jawahir Thontowi, SH., Phd. & Pranoto Iskandar, SH. “ Hukum Internasional Kontemporer, Refika Aditama: Bandung, 2016, p 115
J.G.Starke “Pengantar Hukum Internasional” Justitia Study Group: Bandung, 1986, p.136
Ibrahim, Jhonny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayu Media Publishing: Malang, 2006, p. 295.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. “Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia dan pelaksanaannya Dewasa ini”, Alumni: Bandung, 1983, 12th Edition, p. 7
Magnar, K., Junaenah, I., & Taufik, G.A. Tafsir MK Atas Pasal 33 UUD 1945: (Studi Atas Putusan MK Mengenai Judicial Review UU No./2004, UU No. 22/2001, aUU No.20/2002), Jurnal Konstitusi, 2010, pp. 131-133.
Mauna, Boer. Hukum Internasional, Pengertian, Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global, Alumni:Bandung, 2015, p. 25
Matsushita, et al., “Export Control of Natural Resources: Wto Panel Ruling On The Chinese Export Restrictions Of Natural Resources,” Trade, Law and Development, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, The Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Republic of Indonesia, 2011, p. 414
Mugerwa, Nkambo. Subject Of International Law, Edited by Max Sorensen, New York, 1986, p. 253
Noor, R. I. R. & Ibadi, M.R. Dampak Percepatan Larangan Ekspor Nikel Terhadap Penerimaan Pnbp Dan Perekonomian Nasional, Jurnal Anggaran dan Keuangan Negara Indonesia (AKURASI) Vol. 3 No.1, 2021, p. 103
Purwanto, H. Keberadaan asas rebus sicstantibus dalam Perjanjian Internasional, 2011, www.MimbarHukum.com.
Prof. Dr. Sri Setianingsih,, SH. MH & Ida Kurnia, Dr. SH. MH. “Hukum Perjanjian Internasional” Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, 2019, p. 111
Sulistiyono, A. S.H., M.Hum. “Menggapai Mutiara Keadilan: Membangun Pengadilan yang Independen dengan Paradigma Moral” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, September 2005, p. 162
