Rkuhp: Judicial Pardon Concept In Corruption Crime
Keywords:
Corruption Crime, Judicial Pardon, Legal Reform, RKUHPAbstract
In Judicial Pardon/Rechterlijk Pardon is a new concept of punishment in Indonesia which means that a criminal perpetrator is proven guilty, but not sentenced by a judge in a court of law. The draft of the criminal law draft in 2016 resulted in a renewal of the decision referred to as Rechterlijk Pardon (Judge Pardon) against criminal offenders who are legally proven guilty of committing offenses / criminal acts, for example in the case of corruption. This research seeks to reveal the concept of judicial pardon in criminal law reform in Indonesia and to find out that is it possible for judicial pardon to be used in instances of corruption?. This research is a normative legal research by applying two approaches, namely statute approach and conceptual approach. In conclusion, with the criminal law reform, the RKUHP will include and regulate Special Criminal Acts into a single unit. Especially the crime of corruption contained in a separate chapter that the author associates with the principle of judicial pardon. With the Supreme Court decision of the Republic of Indonesia number 42K/Kr / 1965 dated January 8, 1966, the punishment system in corruption crimes can be sentenced to criminal decisions with leniency and loose decisions. So that Judicial Pardon cannot be applied in corruption crimes.
Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2013). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana (Cetakan ke 3). Ketiga, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia yang Berkeadilan Gender dalam Ranah Kebijakan Formulasi, Aplikasi, dan Eksekusi. Halu Oleo Law Review, 3(2), 178–195.
Djaja, E. (2010). Meredesain pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi: implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 012-016-019/PPU-IV/2006.
Effendi, T. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana (Perkembangan dan Pembaharuannya di Indonesia). Setara Press.
Emong Sapardjaja, K. (2002). Sifat Ajaran Melawan Hukum-Materiil Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Studi Kasus. Alumni, Bandung.
Hamzah, A. (2018). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi kedua. Sinar Grafika.
Huda, C. (2013). Tiada pidana tanpa kesalahan menjadi kepada tiada pertanggungjawaban pidana tanpa kesalahan, kencana. Jakarta.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Salam, A., Zuwandana, A., Al Azmi, C., Wijaya, C. R., Darnita, Tania, I., Lubis, L. K. A., Sitorus, M. A. P., Adawiyah, R., & Sinaga, R. (2022). Analysis of The Implementation of Law in every level of Society in Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i2.80
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Okpirianti, R. (2021). Korupsi Sebagai Tindak Pidana Khusus Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang KUHP. Varia Hukum, 31(40), 94–112.
Priambudi. (2016). Pembaharuan Undang - Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kejaksaan Negeri Jakarta Barat. https://www.kejari-jakbar.go.id/index.php/component/k2/item/239-pembaharuan-undang-undang-pemberantasan-tindak-pidana-korupsi
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2019). Hukum Pidana Untaian Pemikiran. Airlangga University Press.
Saputro, A. A. (2016). Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 28(1), 61–76.
Syahputra, A. (2016). Tinjauan Atas Non-Imposing of a Penalty/Rechterlijk Pardon/dispensa de pena dalam R KUHP serta Harmonisasinya dengan R KUHAP. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, Jakarta.
