The Structure of Public Policy Models Mediated by Public Services on the Performance of Makassar City Government Apparatus
Keywords:
Policy Model, Politics, Socio-Economic, Environment, Public service, Apparatus PerformanceAbstract
The model structure that is in the spotlight in administrative actualization is political policy, the social and economic environment, as agency progress and a fundamental step in the era of society 5.0. The research approach uses exploratory, ex post facto and causal studies. There are two types of data, namely quantitative data and qualitative data. Sources of data in this study consisted of primary and secondary data. Data collection techniques are observation, questionnaires, interviews and documentation. The population is 11,067 civil servants of Makassar City Government. The sample using the 0.10% Slovin formula was obtained as many as 99 apparatus respondents. Data analysis techniques are descriptive statistical analysis techniques and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis. The results show that political policies based on trust, conflict, power, strategy and paradigms have an effect on public services and apparatus performance. Social environmental policies in the form of facilities, competition, security, comfort and communication affect public services and apparatus performance. Economic policies seen from income, equity, unemployment, transactional and budgeting affect public services and apparatus performance. Public services in the form of simplicity, fairness, transparency and economy affect the performance of the apparatus in terms of quantity, quality, efficiency, effectiveness and loyalty of each apparatus. Likewise, political policies, the social environment and the economy indirectly have a significant effect on the performance of the apparatus through public services from the government apparatus, which means that the latent structure of public policies contributes to influencing the improvement of the performance of the apparatus through the services applied to the public.
Downloads
References
Ansar Amir, 2022. Competence Development through Administrative Management on the Performance of Makassar City Government. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume 5, No 2, May 2022, Page: 13993-14002 e-ISSN: 2615-3076, doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5263.
Behn, RD 2017. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures, Public Administration Review, 63, 5.
Bird, S., David, CS, Farewell, V., Harvey, G., Tim, H., Smith, PC 2015. Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 168, No. 1.
Bovaird, T., Loffler, E. 2019. Public Management and Governance, Second edition, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Boyne, G. A, 2018. Explaining Public Service Performance: Does Management Matter?, Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 19, No. 4.
Cable, JH 2017. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Cai. D and Lan Z. 2020. The Complexity Adjust System of the Development of Emerging Industry: Case Study of E-Learning Industry. Management Journal 21(6).
Carter, N., Klein, R. and Day, P. 2017. How Organizations Measure Success: The Use of Performance Indicators in Government. Londonand New York: Routledge.
Doni Mardiyanto, 2018. Analysis of Community Perception of Public Service Quality in Office Social Insurance Administration Organization Surakarta City. International Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Peer Reviewed – International Journal Vol-2, Issue-4, 2018 (IJEBAR) ISSN: 2614-1280.
Hafiez Sofyani, Hosam Aldem Riyad and Heru Fahlevi, 2020. Improving Service Quality, Accountability and Transparency of Local Government: The Intervening Role of Information Technology Governance. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690 . International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 18, Issue 5 (February) ISSN 2289-1552.
Harfiahani Indah Rakhma, 2019. The Effect of Government Internal Control System and Government Accounting System on Performance Accountability with The Financial Quality Statements as Intervening Variables.
Heffron, FA 2019. Organization Theory and Public Organizations: The political Connection, Prentice Hall (Englewood Cliffs, NJ), New York.
Hurian Kamela and Setyaningrum, 2020. Do Political Factors Affect Financial Performance in Public Sector. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Finance Research Vol. 5 No. September 2, 2020. ISSN: 1411-6510.
Jie-Shin Lin and Po Yu Lee, 2018. Performance Management in Public Organization: A Complexity Perspective. International Public Management Review Vol. 12. Iss. 2. www.ipmr.net.
Laegreid, P., Verhoest, K, (Eds.). 2017. Governance of Public Sector Organizations. Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
Lucica Matei, et al, 2016. Public Service Performance and Good Administration. Socio-Economic Empirical Evaluations. Published by Elsevier BV This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Matei, A., Baiesiu, R. 2020. Good Administration and Performance of Local Public Administration, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109.
Morel, B., and Ramanujam, R. 2019. “Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems.” Organization Science 10(3).
Nimrah Rahmayanti Yusuf, 2021. Impact of Human Resource Development on Public Service Through Employee Performance of the Mamuju Center. Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 12 No. 3. ISSN: 4451-1652.
Pidd Raney, 2017. Performance through the Common Assessment Framework. A Critical Review for Romania, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143.
Simeone, R., Carnevale, J., and Millar, A. 2017. “A Systems Approach to Performance-Based Management: The National Drug Control Strategy,” Public Administration Review 65: 2.
Smith, PC and Goddard, M. 2020. “Performance Management and Operational Research: A Marriage Made in Heaven,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3).
Stacey, R. 2016. Strategic Management and Organization Dynamics. London: Pitman.
Sun. B. 2017. The Theoretic and Practical Analysis of Stimulation Issues in Public Performance Management. Personnel Monthly 45(5): 32.
Talbot, C., 2017. Performance and Public Administration. in Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn Jr., and Christopher Pollitt, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, JD, 2019. Good Local Public Administration and Performance. An Empirical Study, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81.
Ulung Pribadi, 2021. Bureaucratic Reform, Public Service, Performance and Citizens Satisfaction: The Case of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Public Policy Administration Journal Vol. 21 No. 2. ISSN: 1648-2603.
Waldo, D. 2018. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
Wilson, W. 2017. The Study of Administration. In Classics of Public administration, eds. JM Shafritz and AC Hyde. Chicago, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.
