Implementation of Electronic Government (E-Government) and Bureaucracy Reform to Achieve Good Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.553Keywords:
implementation of e-Government, a case study from Komisaun Funsaun Publica Timor-Leste, Good GovernanceAbstract
In this era of modernization, the dissemination of information and public transparency are crucial, this phenomenon can be seen through the high number of people in the communities responding to information and the efforts to get transparent information. This can be used as a base to keep track of the government’s working progress and to balance public awareness. Therefore, the government is trying to find various ways to enable people to access information easily so the public can track the government’s overall performance. Good governance is a clean government, a process that can guarantee the realization of human rights in a manner essentially free of abuse and corruption and with due regard to the rule of law. The implementation of electronic government (e-Government) in Timor-Leste, as a form of bureaucratic reform to achieve good governance, began in 2011 using the 2011-2030 Planu Estratejia Dezenvolvimentu Nasional as the foundation for achieving reasonable control. In Planu Estratejia Dezenvolvimentu Nasional 2011-2030, declares that one of the challenges faced by the Government of Timor-Leste after gaining independence is the vulnerability of government institutions so that e-Government plays an essential role in connectivity between the community and the government
Downloads
References
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Azfar, O., Kahkonen, S., Lanyi, A., Meagher, P., & Rutherford, D. (2018). Decentralization, governance and public services: The impact of institutional arrangements. In Devolution and development (pp. 45–88). Routledge.
Caiden, G. E. (2014). Administrative reform comes of age. In Administrative Reform Comes of Age. de Gruyter.
Casaes, J. C. C. (2019). Governan?a de dados abertos governamentais: framework conceitual para as universidades federais, baseado em uma vis?o sist?mica.
Chepkirui, A. (2021). Principles of Good Governance. IDOSR Journal of Arts And Humanities, 47.
Christens, B. D. (2012). Targeting empowerment in community development: A community psychology approach to enhancing local power and well-being. Community Development Journal, 47(4), 538–554.
Daley, D. M. (2015). Strategic human resource management. In Public personnel management (pp. 128–142). Routledge.
Fontainha, F. de C., Geraldo, P. H. B., Veronese, A., Alves, C. S., Figueiredo, B. H. F. R. de C., & Waldburger, J. (2014). Processos seletivos para a contrata??o de servidores p?blicos: Brasil, o pa?s dos concursos?
Garcia, R. C. (2001). Subs?dios para organizar avalia??es da a??o governamental. Planejamento e Pol?ticas P?blicas, 23.
Gomes, C. I. de A. (2017). Preserva??o dos vest?gios forenses: conhecimentos e pr?ticas dos Enfermeiros do Servi?o de Urg?ncia e/ou Emerg?ncia. Universidade de Coimbra.
Liu, X., & Dong, K. (2012). Development of the civil servants? performance appraisal system in China: Challenges and improvements. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), 149–168.
Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public values frames in administration and governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59–72.
Penal, C. O. I. (2014). Suplemento. Registro Oficial, 180.
Rigolin, I. B. (2017). Coment?rios ao regime ?nico dos servidores p?blicos civis. Saraiva Educa??o SA.
Vieira, J. B., & Barreto, R. T. de S. (2019). Governan?a, gest?o de riscos e integridade.
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Thomas, M.-J., & M?ller, A. (2017). E-government implementation: Theoretical aspects and empirical evidence. Public Organization Review, 17(1), 101–120.
