Evaluation of Discretionary Authority on Immigration Supervision
Keywords:
Discretionary, Immigration, Immigration officialAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the scope and executors who have discretionary authority in immigration control and find out what is the legal basis for consideration in using discretionary authority in enforcing immigration law? This writing uses a qualitative empirical normative approach through data collection and analysis techniques. The results of the discussion show that the limits of discretionary authority in immigration, including immigration officials (PPNS) as executors of discretion, the purpose and scope of discretion must be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the exercise of discretion must be carried out in accordance with technical administrative procedures in the Administrative law Government. The implementation of discretionary powers is based on the guidelines of the principle of legality and general principles of good governance as well as the effectiveness and alternatives of immigration administration. It was concluded that immigration law enforcement officers (PPNS) exercise discretionary authority using the principle of legality as a benchmark for implementation and based on juridical and non-juridical considerations. It is recommended to be monitored and implemented strictly to avoid abuse of power.
Downloads
References
Endang, M. I. A. (2018). DISKRESI DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN/DISCRETION AND RESPONSBILITY OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS BASED ON LAW OF STATE ADMINISTRATION. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 223-244.
Kaligis, O. C., & SH, M. (2022). Pencegahan dan pemberantasan korupsi dalam tugas kedinasan. Penerbit Alumni.
Kusuma W, P. H. (2018). Kewenangan Diskresi Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Keimigrasian Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Luar Pengadilan Terkait Penyalahgunaan Izin Tinggal (Studi Di Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Malang) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).
Mustamu, J. (2011). Diskresi dan tanggungjawab administrasi pemerintahan. Sasi, 17(2), 1-9.
Perundang-Undangan UUD 1945
Poedjirahajoe, E. (2018, July). Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam Untuk Kehidupan Yang Lebih Baik (Meminimalisir Dampak Pencemaran Lingkungan). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional.
Raspaty, D., Gosal, R., & Mantiri, M. (2018). KINERJA APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA KANTOR IMIGRASI KELASI I MANADO DALAM PENERBITAN PASPOR. JURNAL EKSEKUTIF, 1(1).
Suryana, N. M. (2018). Pembatasan Terhadap Asas Freies Ermessen. SINTESA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik), 9(2), 105-108.
Suryanto, E. (2010). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Bagi Orang Asing Pelaku Tindak Pidana Keimigrasian (suatu Studi Doktrinal). Wacana Hukum, 9(2).
Susanto, S. N. (2020). Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(3), 430-441.
Tan, D. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463-2478.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian
Yulikhsan, E. (2016). Keputusan Diskresi dalam Dinamika Pemerintahan (Aplikasi dalam PTUN). Deepublish.
