Conflict of Law Culture Consequence Law Transplantation in Indonesia Money Laundry Regulation
Keywords:
Conflict of Laws, Legal Transplant, Money LauderingAbstract
Legal Transplantation in eradication criminal law money laundering framework in Indonesia for the first time was did in 2002 with legislated Law No. 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering and Eradication Money Laundering and then in October 2003 amendment with Law No. 25 of 2003 and then regulated in Law No. 8 of 2010 on Prevention and Eradication Money Laundering Crime. Legal transplantation is carried out by incorporating international standards into the national legal system, particularly into Law of Money Laundering and Eradication Money Laundering. In addition, legal transplantation was also carried out under the pressure of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) which resulted from the assumption that Indonesia has not fully obeyed 40 Recommendations and 9 Special Recommendations from FATF. The type of research used is doctrinal legal research or normative legal research, namely legal research using secondary data sources whose emphasis on theoretical and analytical qualitative. Based on the results of research due to legal transplantation resulted in a conflict of legal value in the criminal law system in Indonesia which is oriented to "follow the suspect" rather than "follow the money" especially in law enforcement anti money laundering regime. Likewise has resulted in a legal culture clash which is a reflection of the legal discipline of socio-political aspects.
Downloads
References
Alan Watson, 1974, Legal; Transplants; An Approach to Comparative Law, 2 nd ed. Athens, Georgia. University of Georgia Press.
BA Sidharta, 2011, Ilmu Hukum Indonesia Upaya Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Yang Responsif Terhadap Perubahan Masyarakat, Jakarta, Genta Publishing.
D Mintohardjo 2016, Dilema Transplantasi Internasional Terkait Pencucian Uang Ke Dalam Beberapa Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Medan. Disertasi Program Doktor (S3) Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatra Utara.
E Setiadi, 2004, Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Bandung. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Bandung.
H Hadikusuma, 1986, Antrophologie Hukum Indonesia. Bandung, Alumni.
I Syaukani & A. Thohari A, 2007, Dasar-Dasar Politik Hukum, Jakarta, RajaGrafindo
Juwono. H. 2005. Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Bidang Ekonomi di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 01 No 1 Tahun 2005. 29
L Fuller, 1971, The Morality of Law. New Haven.com.
L. J Van.Apeldoorn, 1983, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka.
L.M Gandhi, 1995, Harmonisasi Hukum Menuju Hukum Responsif. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Pada Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta. 14 Oktober 1995Garner. A.B. (2000)
N Huda, 2012, UUD 1945 dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang, Jakarta, Rajawali Press.
P.M Mahmud , 2017, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Prenada Media
Pratikno, 2005, Rekonsiliasi, Reformasi Indonesia, Kontribusi Studi Poltik dan Pemerintahan Dalam Menopang Demokrasi dan Pemerintahan Efektif. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Jurusan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Gajah Mada, Yokyakarta. 21 Desember 2005.
R Cotterrell, 2006, Law, Culture, and Society, England. Ashgate
Satjipto.Rahardjo, 2004, Reformasi Menuju Hukum Progressif, Yokyakarta, Majalah Unisia. No.53/XXVII/III/2004.
S.Wignjosoebroto, Transplantasi Hukum Ke Negara Negara Yang Tengah Berkembang, Khususnya Indonesia, Dalam, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Masalah, Jakarta.ELSAM dan HUMA.
Sri Mamudji & Soeryono Soekanto, 2006, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta. Rajawali Press.
Sutan Remi Sjahdeni, 2007, Seluk Beluk Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Pembiayaan Terorisme, Cet II. Jakarta, Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
T Budiyono, 2009, Transplantasi Hukum Harmonisasi dan Potensi Benturan.Salatiga. Griya Media
WJS Poerdarminta, 1976, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta, Balai Pustaka.
Y Kristiana, 2015, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Prespektif Hukum Progresif). Bandung, Thafa.
